Cargando…

The Combined Impact of Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio and Type 2 Diabetic Mellitus on Significant Coronary Artery Disease and Carotid Artery Atherosclerosis

BACKGROUND: Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) has recently emerged as a new important inflammatory marker for predicting cardiovascular events. This study aimed to evaluate the combined impact of NLR and type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) on significant coronary artery disease (CAD) and carotid arte...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kim, Bong-Joon, Cho, Sang-Hoon, Cho, Kyoung-Im, Kim, Hyun-Su, Heo, Jung-Ho, Cha, Tae-Joon
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Korean Society of Echocardiography 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4925388/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27358703
http://dx.doi.org/10.4250/jcu.2016.24.2.115
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) has recently emerged as a new important inflammatory marker for predicting cardiovascular events. This study aimed to evaluate the combined impact of NLR and type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) on significant coronary artery disease (CAD) and carotid artery atherosclerosis. METHODS: This study includes a total of 828 patients evaluated by coronary angiography and carotid ultrasonography. Significant CAD was defined as at least one vessel with stenosis greater than 50%. We employed logistic regression models to investigate the association of NLR and T2DM with significant CAD. The goodness-of-fit and discriminability of the models were assessed by the loglikelihood ratio test and C-index, respectively. Also, we investigated the clinical relevance of the categorized NLR that classifies patients into three risk groups (low, intermediate, high). RESULTS: According to logistic regression analysis, both NLR {adjusted odds ratio (OR) 1.31, p < 0.001} and T2DM (adjusted OR 2.46, p = 0.006) were independent risk factors of significant CAD. The addition of NLR and T2DM into a logistic regression model including conventional cardiovascular risk factors significantly improved the goodness-of-fit (p < 0.001) and the discriminability of the model (p = 0.004). Also, T2DM patients assigned into the high risk group (NLR > 2) showed the greater prevalence of significant CAD and carotid artery atherosclerosis compared with patients without T2DM or type 2 diabetic patients assigned into the low risk group (NLR ≤ 1). CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that type 2 diabetic patients with high inflammatory state would be more vulnerable to significant CAD and carotid artery atherosclerosis.