Cargando…

Evidence for obtaining a second successive semen sample for intrauterine insemination in selected patients: results from 32 consecutive cases

OBJECTIVE: The goal of this study was to compare the semen parameters of two successive samples obtained within an interval of less than 60 minutes from patients planning to undergo intrauterine insemination (IUI) whose first samples exhibited low semen quality. METHODS: Thirty-two consecutive patie...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ortiz, Alejandra, Ortiz, Rita, Soto, Evelyn, Hartmann, Jonathan, Manzur, Alejandro, Marconi, Marcelo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Korean Society for Reproductive Medicine 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4925864/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27358828
http://dx.doi.org/10.5653/cerm.2016.43.2.102
_version_ 1782439999390613504
author Ortiz, Alejandra
Ortiz, Rita
Soto, Evelyn
Hartmann, Jonathan
Manzur, Alejandro
Marconi, Marcelo
author_facet Ortiz, Alejandra
Ortiz, Rita
Soto, Evelyn
Hartmann, Jonathan
Manzur, Alejandro
Marconi, Marcelo
author_sort Ortiz, Alejandra
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: The goal of this study was to compare the semen parameters of two successive samples obtained within an interval of less than 60 minutes from patients planning to undergo intrauterine insemination (IUI) whose first samples exhibited low semen quality. METHODS: Thirty-two consecutive patients were enrolled in the study. On the day of IUI, the semen analysis of the samples initially presented by all patients met at least two of the following criteria: sperm concentration <5×10(6)/mL, total sperm count <10×10(6), progressive sperm motility (a+b) in the native sample <30%, and total motile sperm count (TMSC) <4×10(6). A successive semen sample was obtained no more than 60 minutes after the first sample. RESULTS: Compared to the first sample, the second exhibited significantly (p<0.05) improved sperm concentration, TMSC, progressive motility, and vitality. Regarding TMSC, the most critical parameter on the day of IUI, 23 patients (71.8%) improved it, while nine (28.2%) displayed poorer outcomes. CONCLUSION: In defined cases, requesting a second successive ejaculate on the day of insemination may result in a high percentage of cases in an improvement of the quality of the sample.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4925864
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher The Korean Society for Reproductive Medicine
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-49258642016-06-29 Evidence for obtaining a second successive semen sample for intrauterine insemination in selected patients: results from 32 consecutive cases Ortiz, Alejandra Ortiz, Rita Soto, Evelyn Hartmann, Jonathan Manzur, Alejandro Marconi, Marcelo Clin Exp Reprod Med Original Article OBJECTIVE: The goal of this study was to compare the semen parameters of two successive samples obtained within an interval of less than 60 minutes from patients planning to undergo intrauterine insemination (IUI) whose first samples exhibited low semen quality. METHODS: Thirty-two consecutive patients were enrolled in the study. On the day of IUI, the semen analysis of the samples initially presented by all patients met at least two of the following criteria: sperm concentration <5×10(6)/mL, total sperm count <10×10(6), progressive sperm motility (a+b) in the native sample <30%, and total motile sperm count (TMSC) <4×10(6). A successive semen sample was obtained no more than 60 minutes after the first sample. RESULTS: Compared to the first sample, the second exhibited significantly (p<0.05) improved sperm concentration, TMSC, progressive motility, and vitality. Regarding TMSC, the most critical parameter on the day of IUI, 23 patients (71.8%) improved it, while nine (28.2%) displayed poorer outcomes. CONCLUSION: In defined cases, requesting a second successive ejaculate on the day of insemination may result in a high percentage of cases in an improvement of the quality of the sample. The Korean Society for Reproductive Medicine 2016-06 2016-06-23 /pmc/articles/PMC4925864/ /pubmed/27358828 http://dx.doi.org/10.5653/cerm.2016.43.2.102 Text en Copyright © 2016. The Korean Society for Reproductive Medicine http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Ortiz, Alejandra
Ortiz, Rita
Soto, Evelyn
Hartmann, Jonathan
Manzur, Alejandro
Marconi, Marcelo
Evidence for obtaining a second successive semen sample for intrauterine insemination in selected patients: results from 32 consecutive cases
title Evidence for obtaining a second successive semen sample for intrauterine insemination in selected patients: results from 32 consecutive cases
title_full Evidence for obtaining a second successive semen sample for intrauterine insemination in selected patients: results from 32 consecutive cases
title_fullStr Evidence for obtaining a second successive semen sample for intrauterine insemination in selected patients: results from 32 consecutive cases
title_full_unstemmed Evidence for obtaining a second successive semen sample for intrauterine insemination in selected patients: results from 32 consecutive cases
title_short Evidence for obtaining a second successive semen sample for intrauterine insemination in selected patients: results from 32 consecutive cases
title_sort evidence for obtaining a second successive semen sample for intrauterine insemination in selected patients: results from 32 consecutive cases
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4925864/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27358828
http://dx.doi.org/10.5653/cerm.2016.43.2.102
work_keys_str_mv AT ortizalejandra evidenceforobtainingasecondsuccessivesemensampleforintrauterineinseminationinselectedpatientsresultsfrom32consecutivecases
AT ortizrita evidenceforobtainingasecondsuccessivesemensampleforintrauterineinseminationinselectedpatientsresultsfrom32consecutivecases
AT sotoevelyn evidenceforobtainingasecondsuccessivesemensampleforintrauterineinseminationinselectedpatientsresultsfrom32consecutivecases
AT hartmannjonathan evidenceforobtainingasecondsuccessivesemensampleforintrauterineinseminationinselectedpatientsresultsfrom32consecutivecases
AT manzuralejandro evidenceforobtainingasecondsuccessivesemensampleforintrauterineinseminationinselectedpatientsresultsfrom32consecutivecases
AT marconimarcelo evidenceforobtainingasecondsuccessivesemensampleforintrauterineinseminationinselectedpatientsresultsfrom32consecutivecases