Cargando…
Acute Aortic Dissection Biomarkers Identified Using Isobaric Tags for Relative and Absolute Quantitation
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the utility of potential serum biomarkers for acute aortic dissection (AAD) that were identified by isobaric Tags for Relative and Absolute Quantitation (iTRAQ) approaches. Serum samples from 20 AAD patients and 20 healthy volunteers were analyzed using iTRA...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4925974/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27403433 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/6421451 |
_version_ | 1782440020083212288 |
---|---|
author | Xiao, Ziya Xue, Yuan Yao, Chenling Gu, Guorong Zhang, Yaping Zhang, Jin Fan, Fan Luan, Xiao Deng, Zhi Tao, Zhengang Song, Zhen-ju Tong, Chaoyang Wang, Haojun |
author_facet | Xiao, Ziya Xue, Yuan Yao, Chenling Gu, Guorong Zhang, Yaping Zhang, Jin Fan, Fan Luan, Xiao Deng, Zhi Tao, Zhengang Song, Zhen-ju Tong, Chaoyang Wang, Haojun |
author_sort | Xiao, Ziya |
collection | PubMed |
description | The purpose of this study was to evaluate the utility of potential serum biomarkers for acute aortic dissection (AAD) that were identified by isobaric Tags for Relative and Absolute Quantitation (iTRAQ) approaches. Serum samples from 20 AAD patients and 20 healthy volunteers were analyzed using iTRAQ technology. Protein validation was performed using samples from 120 patients with chest pain. A total of 355 proteins were identified with the iTRAQ approach; 164 proteins reached the strict quantitative standard, and 125 proteins were increased or decreased more than 1.2-fold (64 and 61 proteins were up- and downregulated, resp.). Lumican, C-reactive protein (CRP), thrombospondin-1 (TSP-1), and D-dimer were selected as candidate biomarkers for the validation tests. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves show that Lumican and D-dimer have diagnostic value (area under the curves [AUCs] 0.895 and 0.891, P < 0.05). For Lumican, the diagnostic sensitivity and specificity were 73.33% and 98.33%, while the corresponding values for D-dimer were 93.33% and 68.33%. For Lumican and D-dimer AAD combined diagnosis, the sensitivity and specificity were 88.33% and 95%, respectively. In conclusion, Lumican has good specificity and D-dimer has good sensitivity for the diagnosis of AAD, while the combined detection of D-dimer and Lumican has better diagnostic value. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4925974 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Hindawi Publishing Corporation |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-49259742016-07-11 Acute Aortic Dissection Biomarkers Identified Using Isobaric Tags for Relative and Absolute Quantitation Xiao, Ziya Xue, Yuan Yao, Chenling Gu, Guorong Zhang, Yaping Zhang, Jin Fan, Fan Luan, Xiao Deng, Zhi Tao, Zhengang Song, Zhen-ju Tong, Chaoyang Wang, Haojun Biomed Res Int Research Article The purpose of this study was to evaluate the utility of potential serum biomarkers for acute aortic dissection (AAD) that were identified by isobaric Tags for Relative and Absolute Quantitation (iTRAQ) approaches. Serum samples from 20 AAD patients and 20 healthy volunteers were analyzed using iTRAQ technology. Protein validation was performed using samples from 120 patients with chest pain. A total of 355 proteins were identified with the iTRAQ approach; 164 proteins reached the strict quantitative standard, and 125 proteins were increased or decreased more than 1.2-fold (64 and 61 proteins were up- and downregulated, resp.). Lumican, C-reactive protein (CRP), thrombospondin-1 (TSP-1), and D-dimer were selected as candidate biomarkers for the validation tests. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves show that Lumican and D-dimer have diagnostic value (area under the curves [AUCs] 0.895 and 0.891, P < 0.05). For Lumican, the diagnostic sensitivity and specificity were 73.33% and 98.33%, while the corresponding values for D-dimer were 93.33% and 68.33%. For Lumican and D-dimer AAD combined diagnosis, the sensitivity and specificity were 88.33% and 95%, respectively. In conclusion, Lumican has good specificity and D-dimer has good sensitivity for the diagnosis of AAD, while the combined detection of D-dimer and Lumican has better diagnostic value. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2016 2016-06-15 /pmc/articles/PMC4925974/ /pubmed/27403433 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/6421451 Text en Copyright © 2016 Ziya Xiao et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Xiao, Ziya Xue, Yuan Yao, Chenling Gu, Guorong Zhang, Yaping Zhang, Jin Fan, Fan Luan, Xiao Deng, Zhi Tao, Zhengang Song, Zhen-ju Tong, Chaoyang Wang, Haojun Acute Aortic Dissection Biomarkers Identified Using Isobaric Tags for Relative and Absolute Quantitation |
title | Acute Aortic Dissection Biomarkers Identified Using Isobaric Tags for Relative and Absolute Quantitation |
title_full | Acute Aortic Dissection Biomarkers Identified Using Isobaric Tags for Relative and Absolute Quantitation |
title_fullStr | Acute Aortic Dissection Biomarkers Identified Using Isobaric Tags for Relative and Absolute Quantitation |
title_full_unstemmed | Acute Aortic Dissection Biomarkers Identified Using Isobaric Tags for Relative and Absolute Quantitation |
title_short | Acute Aortic Dissection Biomarkers Identified Using Isobaric Tags for Relative and Absolute Quantitation |
title_sort | acute aortic dissection biomarkers identified using isobaric tags for relative and absolute quantitation |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4925974/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27403433 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/6421451 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT xiaoziya acuteaorticdissectionbiomarkersidentifiedusingisobarictagsforrelativeandabsolutequantitation AT xueyuan acuteaorticdissectionbiomarkersidentifiedusingisobarictagsforrelativeandabsolutequantitation AT yaochenling acuteaorticdissectionbiomarkersidentifiedusingisobarictagsforrelativeandabsolutequantitation AT guguorong acuteaorticdissectionbiomarkersidentifiedusingisobarictagsforrelativeandabsolutequantitation AT zhangyaping acuteaorticdissectionbiomarkersidentifiedusingisobarictagsforrelativeandabsolutequantitation AT zhangjin acuteaorticdissectionbiomarkersidentifiedusingisobarictagsforrelativeandabsolutequantitation AT fanfan acuteaorticdissectionbiomarkersidentifiedusingisobarictagsforrelativeandabsolutequantitation AT luanxiao acuteaorticdissectionbiomarkersidentifiedusingisobarictagsforrelativeandabsolutequantitation AT dengzhi acuteaorticdissectionbiomarkersidentifiedusingisobarictagsforrelativeandabsolutequantitation AT taozhengang acuteaorticdissectionbiomarkersidentifiedusingisobarictagsforrelativeandabsolutequantitation AT songzhenju acuteaorticdissectionbiomarkersidentifiedusingisobarictagsforrelativeandabsolutequantitation AT tongchaoyang acuteaorticdissectionbiomarkersidentifiedusingisobarictagsforrelativeandabsolutequantitation AT wanghaojun acuteaorticdissectionbiomarkersidentifiedusingisobarictagsforrelativeandabsolutequantitation |