Cargando…

Acute Aortic Dissection Biomarkers Identified Using Isobaric Tags for Relative and Absolute Quantitation

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the utility of potential serum biomarkers for acute aortic dissection (AAD) that were identified by isobaric Tags for Relative and Absolute Quantitation (iTRAQ) approaches. Serum samples from 20 AAD patients and 20 healthy volunteers were analyzed using iTRA...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Xiao, Ziya, Xue, Yuan, Yao, Chenling, Gu, Guorong, Zhang, Yaping, Zhang, Jin, Fan, Fan, Luan, Xiao, Deng, Zhi, Tao, Zhengang, Song, Zhen-ju, Tong, Chaoyang, Wang, Haojun
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4925974/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27403433
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/6421451
_version_ 1782440020083212288
author Xiao, Ziya
Xue, Yuan
Yao, Chenling
Gu, Guorong
Zhang, Yaping
Zhang, Jin
Fan, Fan
Luan, Xiao
Deng, Zhi
Tao, Zhengang
Song, Zhen-ju
Tong, Chaoyang
Wang, Haojun
author_facet Xiao, Ziya
Xue, Yuan
Yao, Chenling
Gu, Guorong
Zhang, Yaping
Zhang, Jin
Fan, Fan
Luan, Xiao
Deng, Zhi
Tao, Zhengang
Song, Zhen-ju
Tong, Chaoyang
Wang, Haojun
author_sort Xiao, Ziya
collection PubMed
description The purpose of this study was to evaluate the utility of potential serum biomarkers for acute aortic dissection (AAD) that were identified by isobaric Tags for Relative and Absolute Quantitation (iTRAQ) approaches. Serum samples from 20 AAD patients and 20 healthy volunteers were analyzed using iTRAQ technology. Protein validation was performed using samples from 120 patients with chest pain. A total of 355 proteins were identified with the iTRAQ approach; 164 proteins reached the strict quantitative standard, and 125 proteins were increased or decreased more than 1.2-fold (64 and 61 proteins were up- and downregulated, resp.). Lumican, C-reactive protein (CRP), thrombospondin-1 (TSP-1), and D-dimer were selected as candidate biomarkers for the validation tests. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves show that Lumican and D-dimer have diagnostic value (area under the curves [AUCs] 0.895 and 0.891, P < 0.05). For Lumican, the diagnostic sensitivity and specificity were 73.33% and 98.33%, while the corresponding values for D-dimer were 93.33% and 68.33%. For Lumican and D-dimer AAD combined diagnosis, the sensitivity and specificity were 88.33% and 95%, respectively. In conclusion, Lumican has good specificity and D-dimer has good sensitivity for the diagnosis of AAD, while the combined detection of D-dimer and Lumican has better diagnostic value.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4925974
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Hindawi Publishing Corporation
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-49259742016-07-11 Acute Aortic Dissection Biomarkers Identified Using Isobaric Tags for Relative and Absolute Quantitation Xiao, Ziya Xue, Yuan Yao, Chenling Gu, Guorong Zhang, Yaping Zhang, Jin Fan, Fan Luan, Xiao Deng, Zhi Tao, Zhengang Song, Zhen-ju Tong, Chaoyang Wang, Haojun Biomed Res Int Research Article The purpose of this study was to evaluate the utility of potential serum biomarkers for acute aortic dissection (AAD) that were identified by isobaric Tags for Relative and Absolute Quantitation (iTRAQ) approaches. Serum samples from 20 AAD patients and 20 healthy volunteers were analyzed using iTRAQ technology. Protein validation was performed using samples from 120 patients with chest pain. A total of 355 proteins were identified with the iTRAQ approach; 164 proteins reached the strict quantitative standard, and 125 proteins were increased or decreased more than 1.2-fold (64 and 61 proteins were up- and downregulated, resp.). Lumican, C-reactive protein (CRP), thrombospondin-1 (TSP-1), and D-dimer were selected as candidate biomarkers for the validation tests. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves show that Lumican and D-dimer have diagnostic value (area under the curves [AUCs] 0.895 and 0.891, P < 0.05). For Lumican, the diagnostic sensitivity and specificity were 73.33% and 98.33%, while the corresponding values for D-dimer were 93.33% and 68.33%. For Lumican and D-dimer AAD combined diagnosis, the sensitivity and specificity were 88.33% and 95%, respectively. In conclusion, Lumican has good specificity and D-dimer has good sensitivity for the diagnosis of AAD, while the combined detection of D-dimer and Lumican has better diagnostic value. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2016 2016-06-15 /pmc/articles/PMC4925974/ /pubmed/27403433 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/6421451 Text en Copyright © 2016 Ziya Xiao et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Xiao, Ziya
Xue, Yuan
Yao, Chenling
Gu, Guorong
Zhang, Yaping
Zhang, Jin
Fan, Fan
Luan, Xiao
Deng, Zhi
Tao, Zhengang
Song, Zhen-ju
Tong, Chaoyang
Wang, Haojun
Acute Aortic Dissection Biomarkers Identified Using Isobaric Tags for Relative and Absolute Quantitation
title Acute Aortic Dissection Biomarkers Identified Using Isobaric Tags for Relative and Absolute Quantitation
title_full Acute Aortic Dissection Biomarkers Identified Using Isobaric Tags for Relative and Absolute Quantitation
title_fullStr Acute Aortic Dissection Biomarkers Identified Using Isobaric Tags for Relative and Absolute Quantitation
title_full_unstemmed Acute Aortic Dissection Biomarkers Identified Using Isobaric Tags for Relative and Absolute Quantitation
title_short Acute Aortic Dissection Biomarkers Identified Using Isobaric Tags for Relative and Absolute Quantitation
title_sort acute aortic dissection biomarkers identified using isobaric tags for relative and absolute quantitation
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4925974/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27403433
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/6421451
work_keys_str_mv AT xiaoziya acuteaorticdissectionbiomarkersidentifiedusingisobarictagsforrelativeandabsolutequantitation
AT xueyuan acuteaorticdissectionbiomarkersidentifiedusingisobarictagsforrelativeandabsolutequantitation
AT yaochenling acuteaorticdissectionbiomarkersidentifiedusingisobarictagsforrelativeandabsolutequantitation
AT guguorong acuteaorticdissectionbiomarkersidentifiedusingisobarictagsforrelativeandabsolutequantitation
AT zhangyaping acuteaorticdissectionbiomarkersidentifiedusingisobarictagsforrelativeandabsolutequantitation
AT zhangjin acuteaorticdissectionbiomarkersidentifiedusingisobarictagsforrelativeandabsolutequantitation
AT fanfan acuteaorticdissectionbiomarkersidentifiedusingisobarictagsforrelativeandabsolutequantitation
AT luanxiao acuteaorticdissectionbiomarkersidentifiedusingisobarictagsforrelativeandabsolutequantitation
AT dengzhi acuteaorticdissectionbiomarkersidentifiedusingisobarictagsforrelativeandabsolutequantitation
AT taozhengang acuteaorticdissectionbiomarkersidentifiedusingisobarictagsforrelativeandabsolutequantitation
AT songzhenju acuteaorticdissectionbiomarkersidentifiedusingisobarictagsforrelativeandabsolutequantitation
AT tongchaoyang acuteaorticdissectionbiomarkersidentifiedusingisobarictagsforrelativeandabsolutequantitation
AT wanghaojun acuteaorticdissectionbiomarkersidentifiedusingisobarictagsforrelativeandabsolutequantitation