Cargando…

Comparative genomics analysis of the companion mechanisms of Bacillus thuringiensis Bc601 and Bacillus endophyticus Hbe603 in bacterial consortium

Bacillus thuringiensis and Bacillus endophyticus both act as the companion bacteria, which cooperate with Ketogulonigenium vulgare in vitamin C two-step fermentation. Two Bacillus species have different morphologies, swarming motility and 2-keto-L-gulonic acid productivities when they co-culture wit...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jia, Nan, Ding, Ming-Zhu, Gao, Feng, Yuan, Ying-Jin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4926094/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27353048
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep28794
_version_ 1782440043620597760
author Jia, Nan
Ding, Ming-Zhu
Gao, Feng
Yuan, Ying-Jin
author_facet Jia, Nan
Ding, Ming-Zhu
Gao, Feng
Yuan, Ying-Jin
author_sort Jia, Nan
collection PubMed
description Bacillus thuringiensis and Bacillus endophyticus both act as the companion bacteria, which cooperate with Ketogulonigenium vulgare in vitamin C two-step fermentation. Two Bacillus species have different morphologies, swarming motility and 2-keto-L-gulonic acid productivities when they co-culture with K. vulgare. Here, we report the complete genome sequencing of B. thuringiensis Bc601 and eight plasmids of B. endophyticus Hbe603, and carry out the comparative genomics analysis. Consequently, B. thuringiensis Bc601, with greater ability of response to the external environment, has been found more two-component system, sporulation coat and peptidoglycan biosynthesis related proteins than B. endophyticus Hbe603, and B. endophyticus Hbe603, with greater ability of nutrients biosynthesis, has been found more alpha-galactosidase, propanoate, glutathione and inositol phosphate metabolism, and amino acid degradation related proteins than B. thuringiensis Bc601. Different ability of swarming motility, response to the external environment and nutrients biosynthesis may reflect different companion mechanisms of two Bacillus species. Comparative genomic analysis of B. endophyticus and B. thuringiensis enables us to further understand the cooperative mechanism with K. vulgare, and facilitate the optimization of bacterial consortium.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4926094
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Nature Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-49260942016-06-29 Comparative genomics analysis of the companion mechanisms of Bacillus thuringiensis Bc601 and Bacillus endophyticus Hbe603 in bacterial consortium Jia, Nan Ding, Ming-Zhu Gao, Feng Yuan, Ying-Jin Sci Rep Article Bacillus thuringiensis and Bacillus endophyticus both act as the companion bacteria, which cooperate with Ketogulonigenium vulgare in vitamin C two-step fermentation. Two Bacillus species have different morphologies, swarming motility and 2-keto-L-gulonic acid productivities when they co-culture with K. vulgare. Here, we report the complete genome sequencing of B. thuringiensis Bc601 and eight plasmids of B. endophyticus Hbe603, and carry out the comparative genomics analysis. Consequently, B. thuringiensis Bc601, with greater ability of response to the external environment, has been found more two-component system, sporulation coat and peptidoglycan biosynthesis related proteins than B. endophyticus Hbe603, and B. endophyticus Hbe603, with greater ability of nutrients biosynthesis, has been found more alpha-galactosidase, propanoate, glutathione and inositol phosphate metabolism, and amino acid degradation related proteins than B. thuringiensis Bc601. Different ability of swarming motility, response to the external environment and nutrients biosynthesis may reflect different companion mechanisms of two Bacillus species. Comparative genomic analysis of B. endophyticus and B. thuringiensis enables us to further understand the cooperative mechanism with K. vulgare, and facilitate the optimization of bacterial consortium. Nature Publishing Group 2016-06-29 /pmc/articles/PMC4926094/ /pubmed/27353048 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep28794 Text en Copyright © 2016, Macmillan Publishers Limited http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
spellingShingle Article
Jia, Nan
Ding, Ming-Zhu
Gao, Feng
Yuan, Ying-Jin
Comparative genomics analysis of the companion mechanisms of Bacillus thuringiensis Bc601 and Bacillus endophyticus Hbe603 in bacterial consortium
title Comparative genomics analysis of the companion mechanisms of Bacillus thuringiensis Bc601 and Bacillus endophyticus Hbe603 in bacterial consortium
title_full Comparative genomics analysis of the companion mechanisms of Bacillus thuringiensis Bc601 and Bacillus endophyticus Hbe603 in bacterial consortium
title_fullStr Comparative genomics analysis of the companion mechanisms of Bacillus thuringiensis Bc601 and Bacillus endophyticus Hbe603 in bacterial consortium
title_full_unstemmed Comparative genomics analysis of the companion mechanisms of Bacillus thuringiensis Bc601 and Bacillus endophyticus Hbe603 in bacterial consortium
title_short Comparative genomics analysis of the companion mechanisms of Bacillus thuringiensis Bc601 and Bacillus endophyticus Hbe603 in bacterial consortium
title_sort comparative genomics analysis of the companion mechanisms of bacillus thuringiensis bc601 and bacillus endophyticus hbe603 in bacterial consortium
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4926094/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27353048
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep28794
work_keys_str_mv AT jianan comparativegenomicsanalysisofthecompanionmechanismsofbacillusthuringiensisbc601andbacillusendophyticushbe603inbacterialconsortium
AT dingmingzhu comparativegenomicsanalysisofthecompanionmechanismsofbacillusthuringiensisbc601andbacillusendophyticushbe603inbacterialconsortium
AT gaofeng comparativegenomicsanalysisofthecompanionmechanismsofbacillusthuringiensisbc601andbacillusendophyticushbe603inbacterialconsortium
AT yuanyingjin comparativegenomicsanalysisofthecompanionmechanismsofbacillusthuringiensisbc601andbacillusendophyticushbe603inbacterialconsortium