Cargando…

DNA Damage Reduces the Quality, but Not the Quantity of Human Papillomavirus 16 E1 and E2 DNA Replication

Human papillomaviruses (HPVs) are causative agents in almost all cervical carcinomas. HPVs are also causative agents in head and neck cancer, the cases of which are increasing rapidly. Viral replication activates the DNA damage response (DDR) pathway; associated proteins are recruited to replication...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bristol, Molly L., Wang, Xu, Smith, Nathan W., Son, Minkyeong P., Evans, Michael R., Morgan, Iain M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4926195/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27338449
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/v8060175
_version_ 1782440065662713856
author Bristol, Molly L.
Wang, Xu
Smith, Nathan W.
Son, Minkyeong P.
Evans, Michael R.
Morgan, Iain M.
author_facet Bristol, Molly L.
Wang, Xu
Smith, Nathan W.
Son, Minkyeong P.
Evans, Michael R.
Morgan, Iain M.
author_sort Bristol, Molly L.
collection PubMed
description Human papillomaviruses (HPVs) are causative agents in almost all cervical carcinomas. HPVs are also causative agents in head and neck cancer, the cases of which are increasing rapidly. Viral replication activates the DNA damage response (DDR) pathway; associated proteins are recruited to replication foci, and this pathway may serve to allow for viral genome amplification. Likewise, HPV genome double-strand breaks (DSBs) could be produced during replication and could lead to linearization and viral integration. Many studies have shown that viral integration into the host genome results in unregulated expression of the viral oncogenes, E6 and E7, promoting HPV-induced carcinogenesis. Previously, we have demonstrated that DNA-damaging agents, such as etoposide, or knocking down viral replication partner proteins, such as topoisomerase II β binding protein I (TopBP1), does not reduce the level of DNA replication. Here, we investigated whether these treatments alter the quality of DNA replication by HPV16 E1 and E2. We confirm that knockdown of TopBP1 or treatment with etoposide does not reduce total levels of E1/E2-mediated DNA replication; however, the quality of replication is significantly reduced. The results demonstrate that E1 and E2 continue to replicate under genomically-stressed conditions and that this replication is mutagenic. This mutagenesis would promote the formation of substrates for integration of the viral genome into that of the host, a hallmark of cervical cancer.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4926195
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-49261952016-07-06 DNA Damage Reduces the Quality, but Not the Quantity of Human Papillomavirus 16 E1 and E2 DNA Replication Bristol, Molly L. Wang, Xu Smith, Nathan W. Son, Minkyeong P. Evans, Michael R. Morgan, Iain M. Viruses Article Human papillomaviruses (HPVs) are causative agents in almost all cervical carcinomas. HPVs are also causative agents in head and neck cancer, the cases of which are increasing rapidly. Viral replication activates the DNA damage response (DDR) pathway; associated proteins are recruited to replication foci, and this pathway may serve to allow for viral genome amplification. Likewise, HPV genome double-strand breaks (DSBs) could be produced during replication and could lead to linearization and viral integration. Many studies have shown that viral integration into the host genome results in unregulated expression of the viral oncogenes, E6 and E7, promoting HPV-induced carcinogenesis. Previously, we have demonstrated that DNA-damaging agents, such as etoposide, or knocking down viral replication partner proteins, such as topoisomerase II β binding protein I (TopBP1), does not reduce the level of DNA replication. Here, we investigated whether these treatments alter the quality of DNA replication by HPV16 E1 and E2. We confirm that knockdown of TopBP1 or treatment with etoposide does not reduce total levels of E1/E2-mediated DNA replication; however, the quality of replication is significantly reduced. The results demonstrate that E1 and E2 continue to replicate under genomically-stressed conditions and that this replication is mutagenic. This mutagenesis would promote the formation of substrates for integration of the viral genome into that of the host, a hallmark of cervical cancer. MDPI 2016-06-22 /pmc/articles/PMC4926195/ /pubmed/27338449 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/v8060175 Text en © 2016 by the authors; licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Bristol, Molly L.
Wang, Xu
Smith, Nathan W.
Son, Minkyeong P.
Evans, Michael R.
Morgan, Iain M.
DNA Damage Reduces the Quality, but Not the Quantity of Human Papillomavirus 16 E1 and E2 DNA Replication
title DNA Damage Reduces the Quality, but Not the Quantity of Human Papillomavirus 16 E1 and E2 DNA Replication
title_full DNA Damage Reduces the Quality, but Not the Quantity of Human Papillomavirus 16 E1 and E2 DNA Replication
title_fullStr DNA Damage Reduces the Quality, but Not the Quantity of Human Papillomavirus 16 E1 and E2 DNA Replication
title_full_unstemmed DNA Damage Reduces the Quality, but Not the Quantity of Human Papillomavirus 16 E1 and E2 DNA Replication
title_short DNA Damage Reduces the Quality, but Not the Quantity of Human Papillomavirus 16 E1 and E2 DNA Replication
title_sort dna damage reduces the quality, but not the quantity of human papillomavirus 16 e1 and e2 dna replication
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4926195/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27338449
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/v8060175
work_keys_str_mv AT bristolmollyl dnadamagereducesthequalitybutnotthequantityofhumanpapillomavirus16e1ande2dnareplication
AT wangxu dnadamagereducesthequalitybutnotthequantityofhumanpapillomavirus16e1ande2dnareplication
AT smithnathanw dnadamagereducesthequalitybutnotthequantityofhumanpapillomavirus16e1ande2dnareplication
AT sonminkyeongp dnadamagereducesthequalitybutnotthequantityofhumanpapillomavirus16e1ande2dnareplication
AT evansmichaelr dnadamagereducesthequalitybutnotthequantityofhumanpapillomavirus16e1ande2dnareplication
AT morganiainm dnadamagereducesthequalitybutnotthequantityofhumanpapillomavirus16e1ande2dnareplication