Cargando…

Assessment of post-contamination treatments affecting different bonding stages to dentin

OBJECTIVES: To assess the effect of cleansing treatments following saliva and blood contamination at different bonding stages to dentin. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Labial surfaces of 168 permanent maxillary central incisors were ground flat exposing superficial dentin. Specimens were divided into: uncon...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Elkassas, Dina, Arafa, Abla
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4926583/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27403048
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/1305-7456.184159
_version_ 1782440145124851712
author Elkassas, Dina
Arafa, Abla
author_facet Elkassas, Dina
Arafa, Abla
author_sort Elkassas, Dina
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: To assess the effect of cleansing treatments following saliva and blood contamination at different bonding stages to dentin. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Labial surfaces of 168 permanent maxillary central incisors were ground flat exposing superficial dentin. Specimens were divided into: uncontaminated control (A), contamination after etching (B), contamination after adhesive application (C), contamination after adhesive polymerization (D). Groups were further subdivided according to cleansing treatments into: rinsing (B1, C1, D1), re-etching (B2, D3), sodium hypochlorite application (B3), ethyl alcohol application (C2), acetone application (C3), rinsing and rebonding (D2), re-etching and rebonding (D4). Composite microcylinders were bonded to treated substrates and shear loaded micro-shear bond strength (μSBS) until failure and treated surfaces were examined with scanning electron microscope. Debonded surfaces were classified as adhesive, cohesive or mixed failure. The data were analyzed using one-way ANOVA and Tukey's post hoc test. RESULTS: The μSBS values were ranked as follow; Group B: A > B3 > B2 > B1 > B, Group C: A > C3 > C2 > C1 > C, Group D: A > D4 > D1 = D2 ≥ D3. Debonded surfaces showed adhesive failure in Group B while cohesive failure in Groups C and D. CONCLUSIONS: Cleansing treatments differ according to bonding step; re-etching then rebonding suggested if etched substrate or polymerized adhesive were contaminated while acetone application decontaminated affected unpolymerized adhesive.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4926583
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-49265832016-07-12 Assessment of post-contamination treatments affecting different bonding stages to dentin Elkassas, Dina Arafa, Abla Eur J Dent Original Article OBJECTIVES: To assess the effect of cleansing treatments following saliva and blood contamination at different bonding stages to dentin. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Labial surfaces of 168 permanent maxillary central incisors were ground flat exposing superficial dentin. Specimens were divided into: uncontaminated control (A), contamination after etching (B), contamination after adhesive application (C), contamination after adhesive polymerization (D). Groups were further subdivided according to cleansing treatments into: rinsing (B1, C1, D1), re-etching (B2, D3), sodium hypochlorite application (B3), ethyl alcohol application (C2), acetone application (C3), rinsing and rebonding (D2), re-etching and rebonding (D4). Composite microcylinders were bonded to treated substrates and shear loaded micro-shear bond strength (μSBS) until failure and treated surfaces were examined with scanning electron microscope. Debonded surfaces were classified as adhesive, cohesive or mixed failure. The data were analyzed using one-way ANOVA and Tukey's post hoc test. RESULTS: The μSBS values were ranked as follow; Group B: A > B3 > B2 > B1 > B, Group C: A > C3 > C2 > C1 > C, Group D: A > D4 > D1 = D2 ≥ D3. Debonded surfaces showed adhesive failure in Group B while cohesive failure in Groups C and D. CONCLUSIONS: Cleansing treatments differ according to bonding step; re-etching then rebonding suggested if etched substrate or polymerized adhesive were contaminated while acetone application decontaminated affected unpolymerized adhesive. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2016 /pmc/articles/PMC4926583/ /pubmed/27403048 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/1305-7456.184159 Text en Copyright: © European Journal of Dentistry http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Elkassas, Dina
Arafa, Abla
Assessment of post-contamination treatments affecting different bonding stages to dentin
title Assessment of post-contamination treatments affecting different bonding stages to dentin
title_full Assessment of post-contamination treatments affecting different bonding stages to dentin
title_fullStr Assessment of post-contamination treatments affecting different bonding stages to dentin
title_full_unstemmed Assessment of post-contamination treatments affecting different bonding stages to dentin
title_short Assessment of post-contamination treatments affecting different bonding stages to dentin
title_sort assessment of post-contamination treatments affecting different bonding stages to dentin
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4926583/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27403048
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/1305-7456.184159
work_keys_str_mv AT elkassasdina assessmentofpostcontaminationtreatmentsaffectingdifferentbondingstagestodentin
AT arafaabla assessmentofpostcontaminationtreatmentsaffectingdifferentbondingstagestodentin