Cargando…
Insights of private general practitioners in group practice on the introduction of National Health Insurance in South Africa
BACKGROUND: The South African government intends to contract with ‘accredited provider groups’ for capitated primary care under National Health Insurance (NHI). South African solo general practitioners (GPs) are unhappy with group practice. There is no clarity on the views of GPs in group practice o...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
AOSIS
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4926723/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27380785 http://dx.doi.org/10.4102/phcfm.v8i1.1025 |
_version_ | 1782440173152239616 |
---|---|
author | Moosa, Shabir Luiz, John Carmichael, Teresa Peersman, Wim Derese, Anselme |
author_facet | Moosa, Shabir Luiz, John Carmichael, Teresa Peersman, Wim Derese, Anselme |
author_sort | Moosa, Shabir |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The South African government intends to contract with ‘accredited provider groups’ for capitated primary care under National Health Insurance (NHI). South African solo general practitioners (GPs) are unhappy with group practice. There is no clarity on the views of GPs in group practice on contracting to the NHI. OBJECTIVES: To describe the demographic and practice profile of GPs in group practice in South Africa, and evaluate their views on NHI, compared to solo GPs. METHODS: This was a descriptive survey. The population of 8721 private GPs in South Africa with emails available were emailed an online questionnaire. Descriptive statistical analyses and thematic content analysis were conducted. RESULTS: In all, 819 GPs responded (568 solo GPs and 251 GPs in groups). The results are focused on group GPs. GPs in groups have a different demographic practice profile compared to solo GPs. GPs in groups expected R4.86 million ($0.41 million) for a hypothetical NHI proposal of comprehensive primary healthcare (excluding medicines and investigations) to a practice population of 10 000 people. GPs planned a clinical team of 8 to 12 (including nurses) and 4 to 6 administrative staff. GPs in group practices saw three major risks: patient, organisational and government, with three related risk management strategies. CONCLUSIONS: GPs can competitively contract with NHI, although there are concerns. NHI contracting should not be limited to groups. All GPs embraced strong teamwork, including using nurses more effectively. This aligns well with the emergence of family medicine in Africa. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4926723 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | AOSIS |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-49267232016-07-06 Insights of private general practitioners in group practice on the introduction of National Health Insurance in South Africa Moosa, Shabir Luiz, John Carmichael, Teresa Peersman, Wim Derese, Anselme Afr J Prim Health Care Fam Med Original Research BACKGROUND: The South African government intends to contract with ‘accredited provider groups’ for capitated primary care under National Health Insurance (NHI). South African solo general practitioners (GPs) are unhappy with group practice. There is no clarity on the views of GPs in group practice on contracting to the NHI. OBJECTIVES: To describe the demographic and practice profile of GPs in group practice in South Africa, and evaluate their views on NHI, compared to solo GPs. METHODS: This was a descriptive survey. The population of 8721 private GPs in South Africa with emails available were emailed an online questionnaire. Descriptive statistical analyses and thematic content analysis were conducted. RESULTS: In all, 819 GPs responded (568 solo GPs and 251 GPs in groups). The results are focused on group GPs. GPs in groups have a different demographic practice profile compared to solo GPs. GPs in groups expected R4.86 million ($0.41 million) for a hypothetical NHI proposal of comprehensive primary healthcare (excluding medicines and investigations) to a practice population of 10 000 people. GPs planned a clinical team of 8 to 12 (including nurses) and 4 to 6 administrative staff. GPs in group practices saw three major risks: patient, organisational and government, with three related risk management strategies. CONCLUSIONS: GPs can competitively contract with NHI, although there are concerns. NHI contracting should not be limited to groups. All GPs embraced strong teamwork, including using nurses more effectively. This aligns well with the emergence of family medicine in Africa. AOSIS 2016-06-15 /pmc/articles/PMC4926723/ /pubmed/27380785 http://dx.doi.org/10.4102/phcfm.v8i1.1025 Text en © 2016. The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/ AOSIS. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution License. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Moosa, Shabir Luiz, John Carmichael, Teresa Peersman, Wim Derese, Anselme Insights of private general practitioners in group practice on the introduction of National Health Insurance in South Africa |
title | Insights of private general practitioners in group practice on the introduction of National Health Insurance in South Africa |
title_full | Insights of private general practitioners in group practice on the introduction of National Health Insurance in South Africa |
title_fullStr | Insights of private general practitioners in group practice on the introduction of National Health Insurance in South Africa |
title_full_unstemmed | Insights of private general practitioners in group practice on the introduction of National Health Insurance in South Africa |
title_short | Insights of private general practitioners in group practice on the introduction of National Health Insurance in South Africa |
title_sort | insights of private general practitioners in group practice on the introduction of national health insurance in south africa |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4926723/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27380785 http://dx.doi.org/10.4102/phcfm.v8i1.1025 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT moosashabir insightsofprivategeneralpractitionersingrouppracticeontheintroductionofnationalhealthinsuranceinsouthafrica AT luizjohn insightsofprivategeneralpractitionersingrouppracticeontheintroductionofnationalhealthinsuranceinsouthafrica AT carmichaelteresa insightsofprivategeneralpractitionersingrouppracticeontheintroductionofnationalhealthinsuranceinsouthafrica AT peersmanwim insightsofprivategeneralpractitionersingrouppracticeontheintroductionofnationalhealthinsuranceinsouthafrica AT dereseanselme insightsofprivategeneralpractitionersingrouppracticeontheintroductionofnationalhealthinsuranceinsouthafrica |