Cargando…

Will they participate? Predicting patients’ response to clinical trial invitations in a pediatric emergency department

Objective (1) To develop an automated algorithm to predict a patient’s response (ie, if the patient agrees or declines) before he/she is approached for a clinical trial invitation; (2) to assess the algorithm performance and the predictors on real-world patient recruitment data for a diverse set of...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ni, Yizhao, Beck, Andrew F, Taylor, Regina, Dyas, Jenna, Solti, Imre, Grupp-Phelan, Jacqueline, Dexheimer, Judith W
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4926740/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27121609
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jamia/ocv216
_version_ 1782440176968007680
author Ni, Yizhao
Beck, Andrew F
Taylor, Regina
Dyas, Jenna
Solti, Imre
Grupp-Phelan, Jacqueline
Dexheimer, Judith W
author_facet Ni, Yizhao
Beck, Andrew F
Taylor, Regina
Dyas, Jenna
Solti, Imre
Grupp-Phelan, Jacqueline
Dexheimer, Judith W
author_sort Ni, Yizhao
collection PubMed
description Objective (1) To develop an automated algorithm to predict a patient’s response (ie, if the patient agrees or declines) before he/she is approached for a clinical trial invitation; (2) to assess the algorithm performance and the predictors on real-world patient recruitment data for a diverse set of clinical trials in a pediatric emergency department; and (3) to identify directions for future studies in predicting patients’ participation response. Materials and Methods We collected 3345 patients’ response to trial invitations on 18 clinical trials at one center that were actively enrolling patients between January 1, 2010 and December 31, 2012. In parallel, we retrospectively extracted demographic, socioeconomic, and clinical predictors from multiple sources to represent the patients’ profiles. Leveraging machine learning methodology, the automated algorithms predicted participation response for individual patients and identified influential features associated with their decision-making. The performance was validated on the collection of actual patient response, where precision, recall, F-measure, and area under the ROC curve were assessed. Results Compared to the random response predictor that simulated the current practice, the machine learning algorithms achieved significantly better performance (Precision/Recall/F-measure/area under the ROC curve: 70.82%/92.02%/80.04%/72.78% on 10-fold cross validation and 71.52%/92.68%/80.74%/75.74% on the test set). By analyzing the significant features output by the algorithms, the study confirmed several literature findings and identified challenges that could be mitigated to optimize recruitment. Conclusion By exploiting predictive variables from multiple sources, we demonstrated that machine learning algorithms have great potential in improving the effectiveness of the recruitment process by automatically predicting patients’ participation response to trial invitations.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4926740
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-49267402017-07-01 Will they participate? Predicting patients’ response to clinical trial invitations in a pediatric emergency department Ni, Yizhao Beck, Andrew F Taylor, Regina Dyas, Jenna Solti, Imre Grupp-Phelan, Jacqueline Dexheimer, Judith W J Am Med Inform Assoc Precision Medicine Informatics Objective (1) To develop an automated algorithm to predict a patient’s response (ie, if the patient agrees or declines) before he/she is approached for a clinical trial invitation; (2) to assess the algorithm performance and the predictors on real-world patient recruitment data for a diverse set of clinical trials in a pediatric emergency department; and (3) to identify directions for future studies in predicting patients’ participation response. Materials and Methods We collected 3345 patients’ response to trial invitations on 18 clinical trials at one center that were actively enrolling patients between January 1, 2010 and December 31, 2012. In parallel, we retrospectively extracted demographic, socioeconomic, and clinical predictors from multiple sources to represent the patients’ profiles. Leveraging machine learning methodology, the automated algorithms predicted participation response for individual patients and identified influential features associated with their decision-making. The performance was validated on the collection of actual patient response, where precision, recall, F-measure, and area under the ROC curve were assessed. Results Compared to the random response predictor that simulated the current practice, the machine learning algorithms achieved significantly better performance (Precision/Recall/F-measure/area under the ROC curve: 70.82%/92.02%/80.04%/72.78% on 10-fold cross validation and 71.52%/92.68%/80.74%/75.74% on the test set). By analyzing the significant features output by the algorithms, the study confirmed several literature findings and identified challenges that could be mitigated to optimize recruitment. Conclusion By exploiting predictive variables from multiple sources, we demonstrated that machine learning algorithms have great potential in improving the effectiveness of the recruitment process by automatically predicting patients’ participation response to trial invitations. Oxford University Press 2016-07 2016-04-27 /pmc/articles/PMC4926740/ /pubmed/27121609 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jamia/ocv216 Text en © The Author 2016. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Medical Informatics Association. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) ), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Precision Medicine Informatics
Ni, Yizhao
Beck, Andrew F
Taylor, Regina
Dyas, Jenna
Solti, Imre
Grupp-Phelan, Jacqueline
Dexheimer, Judith W
Will they participate? Predicting patients’ response to clinical trial invitations in a pediatric emergency department
title Will they participate? Predicting patients’ response to clinical trial invitations in a pediatric emergency department
title_full Will they participate? Predicting patients’ response to clinical trial invitations in a pediatric emergency department
title_fullStr Will they participate? Predicting patients’ response to clinical trial invitations in a pediatric emergency department
title_full_unstemmed Will they participate? Predicting patients’ response to clinical trial invitations in a pediatric emergency department
title_short Will they participate? Predicting patients’ response to clinical trial invitations in a pediatric emergency department
title_sort will they participate? predicting patients’ response to clinical trial invitations in a pediatric emergency department
topic Precision Medicine Informatics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4926740/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27121609
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jamia/ocv216
work_keys_str_mv AT niyizhao willtheyparticipatepredictingpatientsresponsetoclinicaltrialinvitationsinapediatricemergencydepartment
AT beckandrewf willtheyparticipatepredictingpatientsresponsetoclinicaltrialinvitationsinapediatricemergencydepartment
AT taylorregina willtheyparticipatepredictingpatientsresponsetoclinicaltrialinvitationsinapediatricemergencydepartment
AT dyasjenna willtheyparticipatepredictingpatientsresponsetoclinicaltrialinvitationsinapediatricemergencydepartment
AT soltiimre willtheyparticipatepredictingpatientsresponsetoclinicaltrialinvitationsinapediatricemergencydepartment
AT gruppphelanjacqueline willtheyparticipatepredictingpatientsresponsetoclinicaltrialinvitationsinapediatricemergencydepartment
AT dexheimerjudithw willtheyparticipatepredictingpatientsresponsetoclinicaltrialinvitationsinapediatricemergencydepartment