Cargando…

Barriers to Effective Postmenopausal Osteoporosis Treatment: A Qualitative Study of Patients’ and Practitioners’ Views

BACKGROUND: Only a minority of patients at high risk for osteoporotic fracture receive treatment. OBJECTIVE: Study patients’ and physicians’ views regarding postmenopausal osteoporosis (PMO) to identify impediments to good care. METHODS: A qualitative study involving 18 physicians and 37 women (age...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Alami, Sophie, Hervouet, Lucile, Poiraudeau, Serge, Briot, Karine, Roux, Christian
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4927112/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27355576
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0158365
_version_ 1782440218893221888
author Alami, Sophie
Hervouet, Lucile
Poiraudeau, Serge
Briot, Karine
Roux, Christian
author_facet Alami, Sophie
Hervouet, Lucile
Poiraudeau, Serge
Briot, Karine
Roux, Christian
author_sort Alami, Sophie
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Only a minority of patients at high risk for osteoporotic fracture receive treatment. OBJECTIVE: Study patients’ and physicians’ views regarding postmenopausal osteoporosis (PMO) to identify impediments to good care. METHODS: A qualitative study involving 18 physicians and 37 women (age 57–87) with PMO. RESULTS: All women interviewed considered PMO to be somewhat normal wear-and-tear associated with old age. The women identified a large number of "causes" for osteoporosis but finally viewed it as chance. They all described its progression as slow. Three representations of PMO severity were identified: some women tended to interpreted it as benign (21), others tended to dramatize it (11), and the rest were uncertain (5). These representations did not appear linked to age or fracture. Even the women who associated fracture and PMO were uncertain of the link between them. Fractures were considered to be random events, independent of osteoporosis. Women received general life-style recommendations from their physicians positively, but did not connect them specifically to osteoporosis. Indeed, these recommendations, along with the fear of side effects, the absence of tangible results of treatments, the view of PMO as a natural process, and the representations of PMO severity are factors that may deter treatments and impact compliance. As for the physicians, they identified eight risk factors, recognizing menopause as central to PMO and recognized the link between risk of fracture and PMO. However, some considered the impact of fractures to be limited in time, and viewed PMO as a "benign" disease. Seeing the progression of PMO as slow and inevitable reduced their urgency to diagnose and treat it as compared to other diseases. Some physicians acknowledged limited mastery of the existing therapeutic arsenal and unsuccessful handling of patient compliance. CONCLUSION: Women’s and physicians’ perspectives on PMO converged to trivialize postmenopausal osteoporosis and thus disqualify it as a legitimate disease. A better understanding of women’s and physicians’ views, practices, and concerns related to PMO can improve osteoporosis management.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4927112
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-49271122016-07-18 Barriers to Effective Postmenopausal Osteoporosis Treatment: A Qualitative Study of Patients’ and Practitioners’ Views Alami, Sophie Hervouet, Lucile Poiraudeau, Serge Briot, Karine Roux, Christian PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Only a minority of patients at high risk for osteoporotic fracture receive treatment. OBJECTIVE: Study patients’ and physicians’ views regarding postmenopausal osteoporosis (PMO) to identify impediments to good care. METHODS: A qualitative study involving 18 physicians and 37 women (age 57–87) with PMO. RESULTS: All women interviewed considered PMO to be somewhat normal wear-and-tear associated with old age. The women identified a large number of "causes" for osteoporosis but finally viewed it as chance. They all described its progression as slow. Three representations of PMO severity were identified: some women tended to interpreted it as benign (21), others tended to dramatize it (11), and the rest were uncertain (5). These representations did not appear linked to age or fracture. Even the women who associated fracture and PMO were uncertain of the link between them. Fractures were considered to be random events, independent of osteoporosis. Women received general life-style recommendations from their physicians positively, but did not connect them specifically to osteoporosis. Indeed, these recommendations, along with the fear of side effects, the absence of tangible results of treatments, the view of PMO as a natural process, and the representations of PMO severity are factors that may deter treatments and impact compliance. As for the physicians, they identified eight risk factors, recognizing menopause as central to PMO and recognized the link between risk of fracture and PMO. However, some considered the impact of fractures to be limited in time, and viewed PMO as a "benign" disease. Seeing the progression of PMO as slow and inevitable reduced their urgency to diagnose and treat it as compared to other diseases. Some physicians acknowledged limited mastery of the existing therapeutic arsenal and unsuccessful handling of patient compliance. CONCLUSION: Women’s and physicians’ perspectives on PMO converged to trivialize postmenopausal osteoporosis and thus disqualify it as a legitimate disease. A better understanding of women’s and physicians’ views, practices, and concerns related to PMO can improve osteoporosis management. Public Library of Science 2016-06-29 /pmc/articles/PMC4927112/ /pubmed/27355576 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0158365 Text en © 2016 Alami et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Alami, Sophie
Hervouet, Lucile
Poiraudeau, Serge
Briot, Karine
Roux, Christian
Barriers to Effective Postmenopausal Osteoporosis Treatment: A Qualitative Study of Patients’ and Practitioners’ Views
title Barriers to Effective Postmenopausal Osteoporosis Treatment: A Qualitative Study of Patients’ and Practitioners’ Views
title_full Barriers to Effective Postmenopausal Osteoporosis Treatment: A Qualitative Study of Patients’ and Practitioners’ Views
title_fullStr Barriers to Effective Postmenopausal Osteoporosis Treatment: A Qualitative Study of Patients’ and Practitioners’ Views
title_full_unstemmed Barriers to Effective Postmenopausal Osteoporosis Treatment: A Qualitative Study of Patients’ and Practitioners’ Views
title_short Barriers to Effective Postmenopausal Osteoporosis Treatment: A Qualitative Study of Patients’ and Practitioners’ Views
title_sort barriers to effective postmenopausal osteoporosis treatment: a qualitative study of patients’ and practitioners’ views
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4927112/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27355576
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0158365
work_keys_str_mv AT alamisophie barrierstoeffectivepostmenopausalosteoporosistreatmentaqualitativestudyofpatientsandpractitionersviews
AT hervouetlucile barrierstoeffectivepostmenopausalosteoporosistreatmentaqualitativestudyofpatientsandpractitionersviews
AT poiraudeauserge barrierstoeffectivepostmenopausalosteoporosistreatmentaqualitativestudyofpatientsandpractitionersviews
AT briotkarine barrierstoeffectivepostmenopausalosteoporosistreatmentaqualitativestudyofpatientsandpractitionersviews
AT rouxchristian barrierstoeffectivepostmenopausalosteoporosistreatmentaqualitativestudyofpatientsandpractitionersviews