Cargando…
In vitro antimicrobial activity of five essential oils on multidrug resistant Gram-negative clinical isolates
AIM/BACKGROUND: The emergence of drug-resistant pathogens has drawn attention on medicinal plants for potential antimicrobial properties. The objective of the present study was the investigation of the antimicrobial activity of five plant essential oils on multidrug resistant Gram-negative bacteria....
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
SAGEYA
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4927124/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27366345 http://dx.doi.org/10.5455/jice.20160331064446 |
_version_ | 1782440221607985152 |
---|---|
author | Sakkas, Hercules Gousia, Panagiota Economou, Vangelis Sakkas, Vassilios Petsios, Stefanos Papadopoulou, Chrissanthy |
author_facet | Sakkas, Hercules Gousia, Panagiota Economou, Vangelis Sakkas, Vassilios Petsios, Stefanos Papadopoulou, Chrissanthy |
author_sort | Sakkas, Hercules |
collection | PubMed |
description | AIM/BACKGROUND: The emergence of drug-resistant pathogens has drawn attention on medicinal plants for potential antimicrobial properties. The objective of the present study was the investigation of the antimicrobial activity of five plant essential oils on multidrug resistant Gram-negative bacteria. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Basil, chamomile blue, origanum, thyme, and tea tree oil were tested against clinical isolates of Acinetobacter baumannii (n = 6), Escherichia coli (n = 4), Klebsiella pneumoniae (n = 7), and Pseudomonas aeruginosa (n = 5) using the broth macrodilution method. RESULTS: The tested essential oils produced variable antibacterial effect, while Chamomile blue oil demonstrated no antibacterial activity. Origanum, Thyme, and Basil oils were ineffective on P. aeruginosa isolates. The minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) and minimum bactericidal concentration values ranged from 0.12% to 1.50% (v/v) for tea tree oil, 0.25-4% (v/v) for origanum and thyme oil, 0.50% to >4% for basil oil and >4% for chamomile blue oil. Compared to literature data on reference strains, the reported MIC values were different by 2SD, denoting less successful antimicrobial activity against multidrug resistant isolates. CONCLUSIONS: The antimicrobial activities of the essential oils are influenced by the strain origin (wild, reference, drug sensitive, or resistant) and it should be taken into consideration whenever investigating the plants’ potential for developing new antimicrobials. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4927124 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | SAGEYA |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-49271242016-06-30 In vitro antimicrobial activity of five essential oils on multidrug resistant Gram-negative clinical isolates Sakkas, Hercules Gousia, Panagiota Economou, Vangelis Sakkas, Vassilios Petsios, Stefanos Papadopoulou, Chrissanthy J Intercult Ethnopharmacol Original Research AIM/BACKGROUND: The emergence of drug-resistant pathogens has drawn attention on medicinal plants for potential antimicrobial properties. The objective of the present study was the investigation of the antimicrobial activity of five plant essential oils on multidrug resistant Gram-negative bacteria. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Basil, chamomile blue, origanum, thyme, and tea tree oil were tested against clinical isolates of Acinetobacter baumannii (n = 6), Escherichia coli (n = 4), Klebsiella pneumoniae (n = 7), and Pseudomonas aeruginosa (n = 5) using the broth macrodilution method. RESULTS: The tested essential oils produced variable antibacterial effect, while Chamomile blue oil demonstrated no antibacterial activity. Origanum, Thyme, and Basil oils were ineffective on P. aeruginosa isolates. The minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) and minimum bactericidal concentration values ranged from 0.12% to 1.50% (v/v) for tea tree oil, 0.25-4% (v/v) for origanum and thyme oil, 0.50% to >4% for basil oil and >4% for chamomile blue oil. Compared to literature data on reference strains, the reported MIC values were different by 2SD, denoting less successful antimicrobial activity against multidrug resistant isolates. CONCLUSIONS: The antimicrobial activities of the essential oils are influenced by the strain origin (wild, reference, drug sensitive, or resistant) and it should be taken into consideration whenever investigating the plants’ potential for developing new antimicrobials. SAGEYA 2016-05-30 /pmc/articles/PMC4927124/ /pubmed/27366345 http://dx.doi.org/10.5455/jice.20160331064446 Text en Copyright: © SAGEYA http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an open access article licensed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted, noncommercial use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Sakkas, Hercules Gousia, Panagiota Economou, Vangelis Sakkas, Vassilios Petsios, Stefanos Papadopoulou, Chrissanthy In vitro antimicrobial activity of five essential oils on multidrug resistant Gram-negative clinical isolates |
title | In vitro antimicrobial activity of five essential oils on multidrug resistant Gram-negative clinical isolates |
title_full | In vitro antimicrobial activity of five essential oils on multidrug resistant Gram-negative clinical isolates |
title_fullStr | In vitro antimicrobial activity of five essential oils on multidrug resistant Gram-negative clinical isolates |
title_full_unstemmed | In vitro antimicrobial activity of five essential oils on multidrug resistant Gram-negative clinical isolates |
title_short | In vitro antimicrobial activity of five essential oils on multidrug resistant Gram-negative clinical isolates |
title_sort | in vitro antimicrobial activity of five essential oils on multidrug resistant gram-negative clinical isolates |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4927124/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27366345 http://dx.doi.org/10.5455/jice.20160331064446 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sakkashercules invitroantimicrobialactivityoffiveessentialoilsonmultidrugresistantgramnegativeclinicalisolates AT gousiapanagiota invitroantimicrobialactivityoffiveessentialoilsonmultidrugresistantgramnegativeclinicalisolates AT economouvangelis invitroantimicrobialactivityoffiveessentialoilsonmultidrugresistantgramnegativeclinicalisolates AT sakkasvassilios invitroantimicrobialactivityoffiveessentialoilsonmultidrugresistantgramnegativeclinicalisolates AT petsiosstefanos invitroantimicrobialactivityoffiveessentialoilsonmultidrugresistantgramnegativeclinicalisolates AT papadopoulouchrissanthy invitroantimicrobialactivityoffiveessentialoilsonmultidrugresistantgramnegativeclinicalisolates |