Cargando…
Detecting Deception within Small Groups: A Literature Review
Investigators often have multiple suspects to interview in order to determine whether they are guilty or innocent of a crime. Nevertheless, co-offending has been significantly neglected within the deception detection literature. The current review is the first of its kind to discuss co-offending and...
Autores principales: | Vernham, Zarah, Granhag, Pär-Anders, Mac Giolla, Erik |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4927566/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27445957 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01012 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Corrigendum: Detecting Deception within Small Groups: A Literature Review
por: Vernham, Zarah, et al.
Publicado: (2016) -
Do True and False Intentions Differ in Level of Abstraction? A Test of Construal Level Theory in Deception Contexts
por: Calderon, Sofia, et al.
Publicado: (2017) -
The mental representation of true and false intentions: a comparison of schema-consistent and schema-inconsistent tasks
por: Calderon, Sofia, et al.
Publicado: (2019) -
Drawing what lies ahead: False intentions are more abstractly depicted than true intentions
por: Calderon, Sofia, et al.
Publicado: (2018) -
Interviewing Suspects in Denial: On How Different Evidence Disclosure Modes Affect the Elicitation of New Critical Information
por: May, Lennart, et al.
Publicado: (2017)