Cargando…

How Accurately Can Parents Judge Their Children’s Boredom in School?

The purpose of the present study was to explore what parents know about their Children’s boredom in school; specifically, the frequency, intensity, and antecedents of their Children’s boredom, as well as how they cope with boredom. A questionnaire was administered to 437 grade 9 students (54% female...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nett, Ulrike E., Daschmann, Elena C., Goetz, Thomas, Stupnisky, Robert H.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4927813/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27445876
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00770
_version_ 1782440315031912448
author Nett, Ulrike E.
Daschmann, Elena C.
Goetz, Thomas
Stupnisky, Robert H.
author_facet Nett, Ulrike E.
Daschmann, Elena C.
Goetz, Thomas
Stupnisky, Robert H.
author_sort Nett, Ulrike E.
collection PubMed
description The purpose of the present study was to explore what parents know about their Children’s boredom in school; specifically, the frequency, intensity, and antecedents of their Children’s boredom, as well as how they cope with boredom. A questionnaire was administered to 437 grade 9 students (54% female, M(age) = 14.82) and their parents (72% mothers, 14% fathers, 12% both parents, M(age) = 45.26) measuring variables related to students boredom in mathematics class. Three different measurements were used to evaluate the accuracy of parents’ judgments: (1) the correlation between parents’ and students’ answers, (2) the mean differences between parents’ and students’ answers, and (3) the mean values of absolute differences of parents’ and students’ answers. The results suggest that parents generally have an informed knowledge about their child’s boredom and related facets. This is reflected by a mean correlation of medium size ([Image: see text] = 0.34) and a small mean effect size of the difference between parents’ and students’ judgments over all items ([Image: see text] = 0.20). Parents are also substantially better in judging their Children’s boredom compared to guessing for all variables (mean effect size of [Image: see text] = 0.65). They had the most precise judgments for the frequency and intensity of boredom. The antecedents of boredom (e.g., characteristics of instruction) were also well estimated by parents; specifically, parents tend to have a bias in favor for their children evidenced by overestimating antecedents that cannot be influenced by the students and underestimating those that can be influenced by the students. The least concordance was found between parents’ and Children’s perception of boredom coping strategies (e.g., accepting boredom), implying that parents lack information about how their children intentionally cope with boredom. Implications for research on student boredom are discussed as well as practical applications involving parents in boredom prevention.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4927813
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-49278132016-07-21 How Accurately Can Parents Judge Their Children’s Boredom in School? Nett, Ulrike E. Daschmann, Elena C. Goetz, Thomas Stupnisky, Robert H. Front Psychol Psychology The purpose of the present study was to explore what parents know about their Children’s boredom in school; specifically, the frequency, intensity, and antecedents of their Children’s boredom, as well as how they cope with boredom. A questionnaire was administered to 437 grade 9 students (54% female, M(age) = 14.82) and their parents (72% mothers, 14% fathers, 12% both parents, M(age) = 45.26) measuring variables related to students boredom in mathematics class. Three different measurements were used to evaluate the accuracy of parents’ judgments: (1) the correlation between parents’ and students’ answers, (2) the mean differences between parents’ and students’ answers, and (3) the mean values of absolute differences of parents’ and students’ answers. The results suggest that parents generally have an informed knowledge about their child’s boredom and related facets. This is reflected by a mean correlation of medium size ([Image: see text] = 0.34) and a small mean effect size of the difference between parents’ and students’ judgments over all items ([Image: see text] = 0.20). Parents are also substantially better in judging their Children’s boredom compared to guessing for all variables (mean effect size of [Image: see text] = 0.65). They had the most precise judgments for the frequency and intensity of boredom. The antecedents of boredom (e.g., characteristics of instruction) were also well estimated by parents; specifically, parents tend to have a bias in favor for their children evidenced by overestimating antecedents that cannot be influenced by the students and underestimating those that can be influenced by the students. The least concordance was found between parents’ and Children’s perception of boredom coping strategies (e.g., accepting boredom), implying that parents lack information about how their children intentionally cope with boredom. Implications for research on student boredom are discussed as well as practical applications involving parents in boredom prevention. Frontiers Media S.A. 2016-06-30 /pmc/articles/PMC4927813/ /pubmed/27445876 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00770 Text en Copyright © 2016 Nett, Daschmann, Goetz and Stupnisky. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Psychology
Nett, Ulrike E.
Daschmann, Elena C.
Goetz, Thomas
Stupnisky, Robert H.
How Accurately Can Parents Judge Their Children’s Boredom in School?
title How Accurately Can Parents Judge Their Children’s Boredom in School?
title_full How Accurately Can Parents Judge Their Children’s Boredom in School?
title_fullStr How Accurately Can Parents Judge Their Children’s Boredom in School?
title_full_unstemmed How Accurately Can Parents Judge Their Children’s Boredom in School?
title_short How Accurately Can Parents Judge Their Children’s Boredom in School?
title_sort how accurately can parents judge their children’s boredom in school?
topic Psychology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4927813/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27445876
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00770
work_keys_str_mv AT nettulrikee howaccuratelycanparentsjudgetheirchildrensboredominschool
AT daschmannelenac howaccuratelycanparentsjudgetheirchildrensboredominschool
AT goetzthomas howaccuratelycanparentsjudgetheirchildrensboredominschool
AT stupniskyroberth howaccuratelycanparentsjudgetheirchildrensboredominschool