Cargando…

Variation in Recent Onset Parkinson’s Disease: Implications for Prodromal Detection

Background: The detection of prodromal Parkinson’s disease (PD) is desirable to test drugs with neuroprotective potential, but will be affected by known disease variations. Objective: To assess the prevalence of four key non-motor prodromal PD markers, and evaluate the sensitivity of case detection...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Swallow, Diane M.A., Lawton, Michael A., Grosset, Katherine A., Malek, Naveed, Smith, Callum R., Bajaj, Nin P., Barker, Roger A., Ben-Shlomo, Yoav, Burn, David J., Foltynie, Thomas, Hardy, John, Morris, Huw R., Williams, Nigel, Wood, Nicholas W., Grosset, Donald G.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: IOS Press 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4927926/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27003780
http://dx.doi.org/10.3233/JPD-150741
_version_ 1782440339173277696
author Swallow, Diane M.A.
Lawton, Michael A.
Grosset, Katherine A.
Malek, Naveed
Smith, Callum R.
Bajaj, Nin P.
Barker, Roger A.
Ben-Shlomo, Yoav
Burn, David J.
Foltynie, Thomas
Hardy, John
Morris, Huw R.
Williams, Nigel
Wood, Nicholas W.
Grosset, Donald G.
author_facet Swallow, Diane M.A.
Lawton, Michael A.
Grosset, Katherine A.
Malek, Naveed
Smith, Callum R.
Bajaj, Nin P.
Barker, Roger A.
Ben-Shlomo, Yoav
Burn, David J.
Foltynie, Thomas
Hardy, John
Morris, Huw R.
Williams, Nigel
Wood, Nicholas W.
Grosset, Donald G.
author_sort Swallow, Diane M.A.
collection PubMed
description Background: The detection of prodromal Parkinson’s disease (PD) is desirable to test drugs with neuroprotective potential, but will be affected by known disease variations. Objective: To assess the prevalence of four key non-motor prodromal PD markers, and evaluate the sensitivity of case detection when non-motor screening tools for prodromal PD are implemented in an early clinical PD cohort. Methods: Hyposmia (University of Pennsylvania smell identification test ≤15th centile or Sniffin’ Sticks at or ≤10th centile corrected for age and sex), rapid-eye movement sleep behaviour disorder (RBD questionnaire >4), constipation (<1 daily spontaneous bowel motion) and depression (Leeds >6) were recorded in recent onset PD cases, and proposed non-motor screening criteria applied. Results: In 1,719 PD cases, mean age 68.6 years (SD 8.1), 65.5% male, mean disease duration 1.3 years (SD 0.9), 72.2% were hyposmic, 43.3% had RBD, 22.1% depression, and 21.5% constipation. 11.6% of cases had no key non-motor features, 38.8% one, 32.1% two, 15.5% three, and 2.0% all four. Increasing numbers of non-motor features were associated with younger age (p = 0.019), higher motor scores (p < 0.001), more postural instability gait difficulty (PIGD) (p < 0.001), greater cognitive impairment (p < 0.001) and higher total non-motor burden (p < 0.001). Cases with hyposmia alone were younger (p < 0.001), had less severe cognitive (p = 0.006) and other non-motor features (p < 0.001). All screening criteria selected younger patients (p = 0.001, p < 0.001), three of four greater overall non-motor burden (p = 0.005, p < 0.001), and inclusion of RBD more cognitive impairment (p = 0.003, p = 0.001) and PIGD (p = 0.004, p = 0.001). Conclusions: Varying sensitivity levels, and age and phenotype selectivity, are found when different non-motor screening methods to detect prodromal PD are applied to an early clinical PD cohort.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4927926
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher IOS Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-49279262016-06-30 Variation in Recent Onset Parkinson’s Disease: Implications for Prodromal Detection Swallow, Diane M.A. Lawton, Michael A. Grosset, Katherine A. Malek, Naveed Smith, Callum R. Bajaj, Nin P. Barker, Roger A. Ben-Shlomo, Yoav Burn, David J. Foltynie, Thomas Hardy, John Morris, Huw R. Williams, Nigel Wood, Nicholas W. Grosset, Donald G. J Parkinsons Dis Review Background: The detection of prodromal Parkinson’s disease (PD) is desirable to test drugs with neuroprotective potential, but will be affected by known disease variations. Objective: To assess the prevalence of four key non-motor prodromal PD markers, and evaluate the sensitivity of case detection when non-motor screening tools for prodromal PD are implemented in an early clinical PD cohort. Methods: Hyposmia (University of Pennsylvania smell identification test ≤15th centile or Sniffin’ Sticks at or ≤10th centile corrected for age and sex), rapid-eye movement sleep behaviour disorder (RBD questionnaire >4), constipation (<1 daily spontaneous bowel motion) and depression (Leeds >6) were recorded in recent onset PD cases, and proposed non-motor screening criteria applied. Results: In 1,719 PD cases, mean age 68.6 years (SD 8.1), 65.5% male, mean disease duration 1.3 years (SD 0.9), 72.2% were hyposmic, 43.3% had RBD, 22.1% depression, and 21.5% constipation. 11.6% of cases had no key non-motor features, 38.8% one, 32.1% two, 15.5% three, and 2.0% all four. Increasing numbers of non-motor features were associated with younger age (p = 0.019), higher motor scores (p < 0.001), more postural instability gait difficulty (PIGD) (p < 0.001), greater cognitive impairment (p < 0.001) and higher total non-motor burden (p < 0.001). Cases with hyposmia alone were younger (p < 0.001), had less severe cognitive (p = 0.006) and other non-motor features (p < 0.001). All screening criteria selected younger patients (p = 0.001, p < 0.001), three of four greater overall non-motor burden (p = 0.005, p < 0.001), and inclusion of RBD more cognitive impairment (p = 0.003, p = 0.001) and PIGD (p = 0.004, p = 0.001). Conclusions: Varying sensitivity levels, and age and phenotype selectivity, are found when different non-motor screening methods to detect prodromal PD are applied to an early clinical PD cohort. IOS Press 2016-05-26 /pmc/articles/PMC4927926/ /pubmed/27003780 http://dx.doi.org/10.3233/JPD-150741 Text en IOS Press and the authors. All rights reserved https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Review
Swallow, Diane M.A.
Lawton, Michael A.
Grosset, Katherine A.
Malek, Naveed
Smith, Callum R.
Bajaj, Nin P.
Barker, Roger A.
Ben-Shlomo, Yoav
Burn, David J.
Foltynie, Thomas
Hardy, John
Morris, Huw R.
Williams, Nigel
Wood, Nicholas W.
Grosset, Donald G.
Variation in Recent Onset Parkinson’s Disease: Implications for Prodromal Detection
title Variation in Recent Onset Parkinson’s Disease: Implications for Prodromal Detection
title_full Variation in Recent Onset Parkinson’s Disease: Implications for Prodromal Detection
title_fullStr Variation in Recent Onset Parkinson’s Disease: Implications for Prodromal Detection
title_full_unstemmed Variation in Recent Onset Parkinson’s Disease: Implications for Prodromal Detection
title_short Variation in Recent Onset Parkinson’s Disease: Implications for Prodromal Detection
title_sort variation in recent onset parkinson’s disease: implications for prodromal detection
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4927926/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27003780
http://dx.doi.org/10.3233/JPD-150741
work_keys_str_mv AT swallowdianema variationinrecentonsetparkinsonsdiseaseimplicationsforprodromaldetection
AT lawtonmichaela variationinrecentonsetparkinsonsdiseaseimplicationsforprodromaldetection
AT grossetkatherinea variationinrecentonsetparkinsonsdiseaseimplicationsforprodromaldetection
AT maleknaveed variationinrecentonsetparkinsonsdiseaseimplicationsforprodromaldetection
AT smithcallumr variationinrecentonsetparkinsonsdiseaseimplicationsforprodromaldetection
AT bajajninp variationinrecentonsetparkinsonsdiseaseimplicationsforprodromaldetection
AT barkerrogera variationinrecentonsetparkinsonsdiseaseimplicationsforprodromaldetection
AT benshlomoyoav variationinrecentonsetparkinsonsdiseaseimplicationsforprodromaldetection
AT burndavidj variationinrecentonsetparkinsonsdiseaseimplicationsforprodromaldetection
AT foltyniethomas variationinrecentonsetparkinsonsdiseaseimplicationsforprodromaldetection
AT hardyjohn variationinrecentonsetparkinsonsdiseaseimplicationsforprodromaldetection
AT morrishuwr variationinrecentonsetparkinsonsdiseaseimplicationsforprodromaldetection
AT williamsnigel variationinrecentonsetparkinsonsdiseaseimplicationsforprodromaldetection
AT woodnicholasw variationinrecentonsetparkinsonsdiseaseimplicationsforprodromaldetection
AT grossetdonaldg variationinrecentonsetparkinsonsdiseaseimplicationsforprodromaldetection
AT variationinrecentonsetparkinsonsdiseaseimplicationsforprodromaldetection