Cargando…
Variation in Recent Onset Parkinson’s Disease: Implications for Prodromal Detection
Background: The detection of prodromal Parkinson’s disease (PD) is desirable to test drugs with neuroprotective potential, but will be affected by known disease variations. Objective: To assess the prevalence of four key non-motor prodromal PD markers, and evaluate the sensitivity of case detection...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
IOS Press
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4927926/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27003780 http://dx.doi.org/10.3233/JPD-150741 |
_version_ | 1782440339173277696 |
---|---|
author | Swallow, Diane M.A. Lawton, Michael A. Grosset, Katherine A. Malek, Naveed Smith, Callum R. Bajaj, Nin P. Barker, Roger A. Ben-Shlomo, Yoav Burn, David J. Foltynie, Thomas Hardy, John Morris, Huw R. Williams, Nigel Wood, Nicholas W. Grosset, Donald G. |
author_facet | Swallow, Diane M.A. Lawton, Michael A. Grosset, Katherine A. Malek, Naveed Smith, Callum R. Bajaj, Nin P. Barker, Roger A. Ben-Shlomo, Yoav Burn, David J. Foltynie, Thomas Hardy, John Morris, Huw R. Williams, Nigel Wood, Nicholas W. Grosset, Donald G. |
author_sort | Swallow, Diane M.A. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background: The detection of prodromal Parkinson’s disease (PD) is desirable to test drugs with neuroprotective potential, but will be affected by known disease variations. Objective: To assess the prevalence of four key non-motor prodromal PD markers, and evaluate the sensitivity of case detection when non-motor screening tools for prodromal PD are implemented in an early clinical PD cohort. Methods: Hyposmia (University of Pennsylvania smell identification test ≤15th centile or Sniffin’ Sticks at or ≤10th centile corrected for age and sex), rapid-eye movement sleep behaviour disorder (RBD questionnaire >4), constipation (<1 daily spontaneous bowel motion) and depression (Leeds >6) were recorded in recent onset PD cases, and proposed non-motor screening criteria applied. Results: In 1,719 PD cases, mean age 68.6 years (SD 8.1), 65.5% male, mean disease duration 1.3 years (SD 0.9), 72.2% were hyposmic, 43.3% had RBD, 22.1% depression, and 21.5% constipation. 11.6% of cases had no key non-motor features, 38.8% one, 32.1% two, 15.5% three, and 2.0% all four. Increasing numbers of non-motor features were associated with younger age (p = 0.019), higher motor scores (p < 0.001), more postural instability gait difficulty (PIGD) (p < 0.001), greater cognitive impairment (p < 0.001) and higher total non-motor burden (p < 0.001). Cases with hyposmia alone were younger (p < 0.001), had less severe cognitive (p = 0.006) and other non-motor features (p < 0.001). All screening criteria selected younger patients (p = 0.001, p < 0.001), three of four greater overall non-motor burden (p = 0.005, p < 0.001), and inclusion of RBD more cognitive impairment (p = 0.003, p = 0.001) and PIGD (p = 0.004, p = 0.001). Conclusions: Varying sensitivity levels, and age and phenotype selectivity, are found when different non-motor screening methods to detect prodromal PD are applied to an early clinical PD cohort. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4927926 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | IOS Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-49279262016-06-30 Variation in Recent Onset Parkinson’s Disease: Implications for Prodromal Detection Swallow, Diane M.A. Lawton, Michael A. Grosset, Katherine A. Malek, Naveed Smith, Callum R. Bajaj, Nin P. Barker, Roger A. Ben-Shlomo, Yoav Burn, David J. Foltynie, Thomas Hardy, John Morris, Huw R. Williams, Nigel Wood, Nicholas W. Grosset, Donald G. J Parkinsons Dis Review Background: The detection of prodromal Parkinson’s disease (PD) is desirable to test drugs with neuroprotective potential, but will be affected by known disease variations. Objective: To assess the prevalence of four key non-motor prodromal PD markers, and evaluate the sensitivity of case detection when non-motor screening tools for prodromal PD are implemented in an early clinical PD cohort. Methods: Hyposmia (University of Pennsylvania smell identification test ≤15th centile or Sniffin’ Sticks at or ≤10th centile corrected for age and sex), rapid-eye movement sleep behaviour disorder (RBD questionnaire >4), constipation (<1 daily spontaneous bowel motion) and depression (Leeds >6) were recorded in recent onset PD cases, and proposed non-motor screening criteria applied. Results: In 1,719 PD cases, mean age 68.6 years (SD 8.1), 65.5% male, mean disease duration 1.3 years (SD 0.9), 72.2% were hyposmic, 43.3% had RBD, 22.1% depression, and 21.5% constipation. 11.6% of cases had no key non-motor features, 38.8% one, 32.1% two, 15.5% three, and 2.0% all four. Increasing numbers of non-motor features were associated with younger age (p = 0.019), higher motor scores (p < 0.001), more postural instability gait difficulty (PIGD) (p < 0.001), greater cognitive impairment (p < 0.001) and higher total non-motor burden (p < 0.001). Cases with hyposmia alone were younger (p < 0.001), had less severe cognitive (p = 0.006) and other non-motor features (p < 0.001). All screening criteria selected younger patients (p = 0.001, p < 0.001), three of four greater overall non-motor burden (p = 0.005, p < 0.001), and inclusion of RBD more cognitive impairment (p = 0.003, p = 0.001) and PIGD (p = 0.004, p = 0.001). Conclusions: Varying sensitivity levels, and age and phenotype selectivity, are found when different non-motor screening methods to detect prodromal PD are applied to an early clinical PD cohort. IOS Press 2016-05-26 /pmc/articles/PMC4927926/ /pubmed/27003780 http://dx.doi.org/10.3233/JPD-150741 Text en IOS Press and the authors. All rights reserved https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Review Swallow, Diane M.A. Lawton, Michael A. Grosset, Katherine A. Malek, Naveed Smith, Callum R. Bajaj, Nin P. Barker, Roger A. Ben-Shlomo, Yoav Burn, David J. Foltynie, Thomas Hardy, John Morris, Huw R. Williams, Nigel Wood, Nicholas W. Grosset, Donald G. Variation in Recent Onset Parkinson’s Disease: Implications for Prodromal Detection |
title | Variation in Recent Onset Parkinson’s Disease: Implications for Prodromal Detection |
title_full | Variation in Recent Onset Parkinson’s Disease: Implications for Prodromal Detection |
title_fullStr | Variation in Recent Onset Parkinson’s Disease: Implications for Prodromal Detection |
title_full_unstemmed | Variation in Recent Onset Parkinson’s Disease: Implications for Prodromal Detection |
title_short | Variation in Recent Onset Parkinson’s Disease: Implications for Prodromal Detection |
title_sort | variation in recent onset parkinson’s disease: implications for prodromal detection |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4927926/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27003780 http://dx.doi.org/10.3233/JPD-150741 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT swallowdianema variationinrecentonsetparkinsonsdiseaseimplicationsforprodromaldetection AT lawtonmichaela variationinrecentonsetparkinsonsdiseaseimplicationsforprodromaldetection AT grossetkatherinea variationinrecentonsetparkinsonsdiseaseimplicationsforprodromaldetection AT maleknaveed variationinrecentonsetparkinsonsdiseaseimplicationsforprodromaldetection AT smithcallumr variationinrecentonsetparkinsonsdiseaseimplicationsforprodromaldetection AT bajajninp variationinrecentonsetparkinsonsdiseaseimplicationsforprodromaldetection AT barkerrogera variationinrecentonsetparkinsonsdiseaseimplicationsforprodromaldetection AT benshlomoyoav variationinrecentonsetparkinsonsdiseaseimplicationsforprodromaldetection AT burndavidj variationinrecentonsetparkinsonsdiseaseimplicationsforprodromaldetection AT foltyniethomas variationinrecentonsetparkinsonsdiseaseimplicationsforprodromaldetection AT hardyjohn variationinrecentonsetparkinsonsdiseaseimplicationsforprodromaldetection AT morrishuwr variationinrecentonsetparkinsonsdiseaseimplicationsforprodromaldetection AT williamsnigel variationinrecentonsetparkinsonsdiseaseimplicationsforprodromaldetection AT woodnicholasw variationinrecentonsetparkinsonsdiseaseimplicationsforprodromaldetection AT grossetdonaldg variationinrecentonsetparkinsonsdiseaseimplicationsforprodromaldetection AT variationinrecentonsetparkinsonsdiseaseimplicationsforprodromaldetection |