Cargando…

Sellar reconstruction without intrasellar packing after endoscopic surgery of pituitary macroadenomas is better than its reputation

Objectives: Sellar reconstruction with intrasellar packing following endoscopic resection of pituitary macroadenomas remains a subject of clinical and radiological discussion particularly, when an intraoperative cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leakage is absent. This study was conducted to contribute our...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ismail, Mostafa, Fares, Abd Alla, Abdelhak, Balegh, D’Haens, Jean, Michel, Olaf
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: German Medical Science GMS Publishing House 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4928027/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27408609
http://dx.doi.org/10.3205/000234
_version_ 1782440361171353600
author Ismail, Mostafa
Fares, Abd Alla
Abdelhak, Balegh
D’Haens, Jean
Michel, Olaf
author_facet Ismail, Mostafa
Fares, Abd Alla
Abdelhak, Balegh
D’Haens, Jean
Michel, Olaf
author_sort Ismail, Mostafa
collection PubMed
description Objectives: Sellar reconstruction with intrasellar packing following endoscopic resection of pituitary macroadenomas remains a subject of clinical and radiological discussion particularly, when an intraoperative cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leakage is absent. This study was conducted to contribute our experience with sellar reconstruction after a standard endoscopic surgery of pituitary macroadenomas without intraoperative CSF leakage to the ongoing discussion between techniques with and without intrasellar packing. Methods: A consecutive series of 47 pituitary macroadenomas undergoing excision via a standard endoscopic endonasal transsphenoidal surgery (EETS) without evident intraoperative CSF leakage were retrospectively evaluated over a 10-months mean follow-up period. According to the sellar reconstruction technique, three groups could be identified: Group A – with no intrasellar packing, Group B – with haemostatic materials packing, and Group C – with abdominal fat packing. Postoperative clinical and radiological assessments of the three groups were documented and analyzed for differences in outcome. Results: Postoperative clinical assessment did not differ significantly between the three groups. In group A, postoperative CSF leakage, sphenoid sinusitis and empty sella syndrome were not observed. However, a significant difference in radiological assessment could be identified; the interpretation of sellar contents in postoperative MRI of group A succeeded earlier and more reliably than in other groups with intrasellar packing. Conclusions: There is no difference in the incidence of postoperative CSF leakage and empty sella syndrome among the various reconstructive techniques with and without intrasellar packing, irrespective of size and extension of the pituitary adenoma. Sellar reconstruction without intrasellar packing following a standard EETS is not inferior to other techniques with packing and even shows more radiological advantages, which made it our preferred technique, at least if no intraoperative CSF leakage is evident.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4928027
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher German Medical Science GMS Publishing House
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-49280272016-07-12 Sellar reconstruction without intrasellar packing after endoscopic surgery of pituitary macroadenomas is better than its reputation Ismail, Mostafa Fares, Abd Alla Abdelhak, Balegh D’Haens, Jean Michel, Olaf Ger Med Sci Article Objectives: Sellar reconstruction with intrasellar packing following endoscopic resection of pituitary macroadenomas remains a subject of clinical and radiological discussion particularly, when an intraoperative cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leakage is absent. This study was conducted to contribute our experience with sellar reconstruction after a standard endoscopic surgery of pituitary macroadenomas without intraoperative CSF leakage to the ongoing discussion between techniques with and without intrasellar packing. Methods: A consecutive series of 47 pituitary macroadenomas undergoing excision via a standard endoscopic endonasal transsphenoidal surgery (EETS) without evident intraoperative CSF leakage were retrospectively evaluated over a 10-months mean follow-up period. According to the sellar reconstruction technique, three groups could be identified: Group A – with no intrasellar packing, Group B – with haemostatic materials packing, and Group C – with abdominal fat packing. Postoperative clinical and radiological assessments of the three groups were documented and analyzed for differences in outcome. Results: Postoperative clinical assessment did not differ significantly between the three groups. In group A, postoperative CSF leakage, sphenoid sinusitis and empty sella syndrome were not observed. However, a significant difference in radiological assessment could be identified; the interpretation of sellar contents in postoperative MRI of group A succeeded earlier and more reliably than in other groups with intrasellar packing. Conclusions: There is no difference in the incidence of postoperative CSF leakage and empty sella syndrome among the various reconstructive techniques with and without intrasellar packing, irrespective of size and extension of the pituitary adenoma. Sellar reconstruction without intrasellar packing following a standard EETS is not inferior to other techniques with packing and even shows more radiological advantages, which made it our preferred technique, at least if no intraoperative CSF leakage is evident. German Medical Science GMS Publishing House 2016-06-23 /pmc/articles/PMC4928027/ /pubmed/27408609 http://dx.doi.org/10.3205/000234 Text en Copyright © 2016 Ismail et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
spellingShingle Article
Ismail, Mostafa
Fares, Abd Alla
Abdelhak, Balegh
D’Haens, Jean
Michel, Olaf
Sellar reconstruction without intrasellar packing after endoscopic surgery of pituitary macroadenomas is better than its reputation
title Sellar reconstruction without intrasellar packing after endoscopic surgery of pituitary macroadenomas is better than its reputation
title_full Sellar reconstruction without intrasellar packing after endoscopic surgery of pituitary macroadenomas is better than its reputation
title_fullStr Sellar reconstruction without intrasellar packing after endoscopic surgery of pituitary macroadenomas is better than its reputation
title_full_unstemmed Sellar reconstruction without intrasellar packing after endoscopic surgery of pituitary macroadenomas is better than its reputation
title_short Sellar reconstruction without intrasellar packing after endoscopic surgery of pituitary macroadenomas is better than its reputation
title_sort sellar reconstruction without intrasellar packing after endoscopic surgery of pituitary macroadenomas is better than its reputation
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4928027/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27408609
http://dx.doi.org/10.3205/000234
work_keys_str_mv AT ismailmostafa sellarreconstructionwithoutintrasellarpackingafterendoscopicsurgeryofpituitarymacroadenomasisbetterthanitsreputation
AT faresabdalla sellarreconstructionwithoutintrasellarpackingafterendoscopicsurgeryofpituitarymacroadenomasisbetterthanitsreputation
AT abdelhakbalegh sellarreconstructionwithoutintrasellarpackingafterendoscopicsurgeryofpituitarymacroadenomasisbetterthanitsreputation
AT dhaensjean sellarreconstructionwithoutintrasellarpackingafterendoscopicsurgeryofpituitarymacroadenomasisbetterthanitsreputation
AT michelolaf sellarreconstructionwithoutintrasellarpackingafterendoscopicsurgeryofpituitarymacroadenomasisbetterthanitsreputation