Cargando…

Individuality in nutritional preferences: a multi-level approach in field crickets

Selection may favour individuals of the same population to differ consistently in nutritional preference, for example, because optimal diets covary with morphology or personality. We provided Southern field crickets (Gryllus bimaculatus) with two synthetic food sources (carbohydrates and proteins) a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Han, Chang S., Jäger, Heidi Y., Dingemanse, Niels J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4928176/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27356870
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep29071
_version_ 1782440394811768832
author Han, Chang S.
Jäger, Heidi Y.
Dingemanse, Niels J.
author_facet Han, Chang S.
Jäger, Heidi Y.
Dingemanse, Niels J.
author_sort Han, Chang S.
collection PubMed
description Selection may favour individuals of the same population to differ consistently in nutritional preference, for example, because optimal diets covary with morphology or personality. We provided Southern field crickets (Gryllus bimaculatus) with two synthetic food sources (carbohydrates and proteins) and quantified repeatedly how much of each macronutrient was consumed by each individual. We then quantified (i) whether individuals were repeatable in carbohydrate and protein intake rate, (ii) whether an individual’s average daily intake of carbohydrates was correlated with its average daily intake of protein, and (iii) whether short-term changes in intake of carbohydrates coincided with changes in intake of protein within individuals. Intake rates were individually repeatable for both macronutrients. However, individuals differed in their relative daily intake of carbohydrates versus proteins (i.e., ‘nutritional preference’). By contrast, total consumption varied plastically as a function of body weight within individuals. Body weight—but not personality (i.e., aggression, exploration behaviour)—positively predicted nutritional preference at the individual level as large crickets repeatedly consumed a higher carbohydrate to protein ratio compared to small ones. Our finding of level-specific associations between the consumption of distinct nutritional components demonstrates the merit of applying multivariate and multi-level viewpoints to the study of nutritional preference.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4928176
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Nature Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-49281762016-07-06 Individuality in nutritional preferences: a multi-level approach in field crickets Han, Chang S. Jäger, Heidi Y. Dingemanse, Niels J. Sci Rep Article Selection may favour individuals of the same population to differ consistently in nutritional preference, for example, because optimal diets covary with morphology or personality. We provided Southern field crickets (Gryllus bimaculatus) with two synthetic food sources (carbohydrates and proteins) and quantified repeatedly how much of each macronutrient was consumed by each individual. We then quantified (i) whether individuals were repeatable in carbohydrate and protein intake rate, (ii) whether an individual’s average daily intake of carbohydrates was correlated with its average daily intake of protein, and (iii) whether short-term changes in intake of carbohydrates coincided with changes in intake of protein within individuals. Intake rates were individually repeatable for both macronutrients. However, individuals differed in their relative daily intake of carbohydrates versus proteins (i.e., ‘nutritional preference’). By contrast, total consumption varied plastically as a function of body weight within individuals. Body weight—but not personality (i.e., aggression, exploration behaviour)—positively predicted nutritional preference at the individual level as large crickets repeatedly consumed a higher carbohydrate to protein ratio compared to small ones. Our finding of level-specific associations between the consumption of distinct nutritional components demonstrates the merit of applying multivariate and multi-level viewpoints to the study of nutritional preference. Nature Publishing Group 2016-06-30 /pmc/articles/PMC4928176/ /pubmed/27356870 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep29071 Text en Copyright © 2016, Macmillan Publishers Limited http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
spellingShingle Article
Han, Chang S.
Jäger, Heidi Y.
Dingemanse, Niels J.
Individuality in nutritional preferences: a multi-level approach in field crickets
title Individuality in nutritional preferences: a multi-level approach in field crickets
title_full Individuality in nutritional preferences: a multi-level approach in field crickets
title_fullStr Individuality in nutritional preferences: a multi-level approach in field crickets
title_full_unstemmed Individuality in nutritional preferences: a multi-level approach in field crickets
title_short Individuality in nutritional preferences: a multi-level approach in field crickets
title_sort individuality in nutritional preferences: a multi-level approach in field crickets
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4928176/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27356870
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep29071
work_keys_str_mv AT hanchangs individualityinnutritionalpreferencesamultilevelapproachinfieldcrickets
AT jagerheidiy individualityinnutritionalpreferencesamultilevelapproachinfieldcrickets
AT dingemansenielsj individualityinnutritionalpreferencesamultilevelapproachinfieldcrickets