Cargando…

Evaluation of bone substitutes for treatment of peri-implant bone defects: biomechanical, histological, and immunohistochemical analyses in the rabbit tibia

PURPOSE: We sought to evaluate the effectiveness of bone substitutes in circumferential peri-implant defects created in the rabbit tibia. METHODS: Thirty rabbits received 45 implants in their left and right tibia. A circumferential bone defect (6.1 mm in diameter/4 mm depth) was created in each rabb...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: dos Santos, Pâmela Letícia, de Molon, Rafael Scaf, Queiroz, Thallita Pereira, Okamoto, Roberta, de Souza Faloni, Ana Paula, Gulinelli, Jéssica Lemos, Luvizuto, Eloá Rodrigues, Garcia, Idelmo Rangel
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Korean Academy of Periodontology 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4928206/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27382506
http://dx.doi.org/10.5051/jpis.2016.46.3.176
_version_ 1782440398667382784
author dos Santos, Pâmela Letícia
de Molon, Rafael Scaf
Queiroz, Thallita Pereira
Okamoto, Roberta
de Souza Faloni, Ana Paula
Gulinelli, Jéssica Lemos
Luvizuto, Eloá Rodrigues
Garcia, Idelmo Rangel
author_facet dos Santos, Pâmela Letícia
de Molon, Rafael Scaf
Queiroz, Thallita Pereira
Okamoto, Roberta
de Souza Faloni, Ana Paula
Gulinelli, Jéssica Lemos
Luvizuto, Eloá Rodrigues
Garcia, Idelmo Rangel
author_sort dos Santos, Pâmela Letícia
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: We sought to evaluate the effectiveness of bone substitutes in circumferential peri-implant defects created in the rabbit tibia. METHODS: Thirty rabbits received 45 implants in their left and right tibia. A circumferential bone defect (6.1 mm in diameter/4 mm depth) was created in each rabbit tibia using a trephine bur. A dental implant (4.1 mm × 8.5 mm) was installed after the creation of the defect, providing a 2-mm gap. The bone defect gaps between the implant and the bone were randomly filled according to the following groups: blood clot (CO), particulate Bio-Oss(®) (BI), and Bio-Oss(®) Collagen (BC). Ten animals were euthanized after periods of 15, 30, and 60 days. Biomechanical analysis by means of the removal torque of the implants, as well as histologic and immunohistochemical analyses for protein expression of osteocalcin (OC), Runx2, OPG, RANKL, and TRAP were evaluated. RESULTS: For biomechanics, BC showed a better biological response (61.00±15.28 Ncm) than CO (31.60±14.38 Ncm) at 30 days. Immunohistochemical analysis showed significantly different OC expression in CO and BC at 15 days, and also between the CO and BI groups, and between the CO and BC groups at 60 days. After 15 days, Runx2 expression was significantly different in the BI group compared to the CO and BC groups. RANKL expression was significantly different in the BI and CO groups and between the BI and BC groups at 15 days, and also between the BI and CO groups at 60 days. OPG expression was significantly higher at 60 days postoperatively in the BI group than the CO group. CONCLUSIONS: Collectively, our data indicate that, compared to CO and BI, BC offered better bone healing, which was characterized by greater RUNX2, OC, and OPG immunolabeling, and required greater reversal torque for implant removal. Indeed, along with BI, BC presents promising biomechanical and biological properties supporting its possible use in osteoconductive grafts for filling peri-implant gaps.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4928206
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Korean Academy of Periodontology
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-49282062016-07-05 Evaluation of bone substitutes for treatment of peri-implant bone defects: biomechanical, histological, and immunohistochemical analyses in the rabbit tibia dos Santos, Pâmela Letícia de Molon, Rafael Scaf Queiroz, Thallita Pereira Okamoto, Roberta de Souza Faloni, Ana Paula Gulinelli, Jéssica Lemos Luvizuto, Eloá Rodrigues Garcia, Idelmo Rangel J Periodontal Implant Sci Research Article PURPOSE: We sought to evaluate the effectiveness of bone substitutes in circumferential peri-implant defects created in the rabbit tibia. METHODS: Thirty rabbits received 45 implants in their left and right tibia. A circumferential bone defect (6.1 mm in diameter/4 mm depth) was created in each rabbit tibia using a trephine bur. A dental implant (4.1 mm × 8.5 mm) was installed after the creation of the defect, providing a 2-mm gap. The bone defect gaps between the implant and the bone were randomly filled according to the following groups: blood clot (CO), particulate Bio-Oss(®) (BI), and Bio-Oss(®) Collagen (BC). Ten animals were euthanized after periods of 15, 30, and 60 days. Biomechanical analysis by means of the removal torque of the implants, as well as histologic and immunohistochemical analyses for protein expression of osteocalcin (OC), Runx2, OPG, RANKL, and TRAP were evaluated. RESULTS: For biomechanics, BC showed a better biological response (61.00±15.28 Ncm) than CO (31.60±14.38 Ncm) at 30 days. Immunohistochemical analysis showed significantly different OC expression in CO and BC at 15 days, and also between the CO and BI groups, and between the CO and BC groups at 60 days. After 15 days, Runx2 expression was significantly different in the BI group compared to the CO and BC groups. RANKL expression was significantly different in the BI and CO groups and between the BI and BC groups at 15 days, and also between the BI and CO groups at 60 days. OPG expression was significantly higher at 60 days postoperatively in the BI group than the CO group. CONCLUSIONS: Collectively, our data indicate that, compared to CO and BI, BC offered better bone healing, which was characterized by greater RUNX2, OC, and OPG immunolabeling, and required greater reversal torque for implant removal. Indeed, along with BI, BC presents promising biomechanical and biological properties supporting its possible use in osteoconductive grafts for filling peri-implant gaps. Korean Academy of Periodontology 2016-06 2016-06-28 /pmc/articles/PMC4928206/ /pubmed/27382506 http://dx.doi.org/10.5051/jpis.2016.46.3.176 Text en Copyright © 2016 Korean Academy of Periodontology http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/).
spellingShingle Research Article
dos Santos, Pâmela Letícia
de Molon, Rafael Scaf
Queiroz, Thallita Pereira
Okamoto, Roberta
de Souza Faloni, Ana Paula
Gulinelli, Jéssica Lemos
Luvizuto, Eloá Rodrigues
Garcia, Idelmo Rangel
Evaluation of bone substitutes for treatment of peri-implant bone defects: biomechanical, histological, and immunohistochemical analyses in the rabbit tibia
title Evaluation of bone substitutes for treatment of peri-implant bone defects: biomechanical, histological, and immunohistochemical analyses in the rabbit tibia
title_full Evaluation of bone substitutes for treatment of peri-implant bone defects: biomechanical, histological, and immunohistochemical analyses in the rabbit tibia
title_fullStr Evaluation of bone substitutes for treatment of peri-implant bone defects: biomechanical, histological, and immunohistochemical analyses in the rabbit tibia
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of bone substitutes for treatment of peri-implant bone defects: biomechanical, histological, and immunohistochemical analyses in the rabbit tibia
title_short Evaluation of bone substitutes for treatment of peri-implant bone defects: biomechanical, histological, and immunohistochemical analyses in the rabbit tibia
title_sort evaluation of bone substitutes for treatment of peri-implant bone defects: biomechanical, histological, and immunohistochemical analyses in the rabbit tibia
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4928206/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27382506
http://dx.doi.org/10.5051/jpis.2016.46.3.176
work_keys_str_mv AT dossantospamelaleticia evaluationofbonesubstitutesfortreatmentofperiimplantbonedefectsbiomechanicalhistologicalandimmunohistochemicalanalysesintherabbittibia
AT demolonrafaelscaf evaluationofbonesubstitutesfortreatmentofperiimplantbonedefectsbiomechanicalhistologicalandimmunohistochemicalanalysesintherabbittibia
AT queirozthallitapereira evaluationofbonesubstitutesfortreatmentofperiimplantbonedefectsbiomechanicalhistologicalandimmunohistochemicalanalysesintherabbittibia
AT okamotoroberta evaluationofbonesubstitutesfortreatmentofperiimplantbonedefectsbiomechanicalhistologicalandimmunohistochemicalanalysesintherabbittibia
AT desouzafalonianapaula evaluationofbonesubstitutesfortreatmentofperiimplantbonedefectsbiomechanicalhistologicalandimmunohistochemicalanalysesintherabbittibia
AT gulinellijessicalemos evaluationofbonesubstitutesfortreatmentofperiimplantbonedefectsbiomechanicalhistologicalandimmunohistochemicalanalysesintherabbittibia
AT luvizutoeloarodrigues evaluationofbonesubstitutesfortreatmentofperiimplantbonedefectsbiomechanicalhistologicalandimmunohistochemicalanalysesintherabbittibia
AT garciaidelmorangel evaluationofbonesubstitutesfortreatmentofperiimplantbonedefectsbiomechanicalhistologicalandimmunohistochemicalanalysesintherabbittibia