Cargando…

Sequential Processing and the Matching-Stimulus Interval Effect in ERP Components: An Exploration of the Mechanism Using Multiple Regression

In oddball tasks, increasing the time between stimuli within a particular condition (target-to-target interval, TTI; nontarget-to-nontarget interval, NNI) systematically enhances N1, P2, and P300 event-related potential (ERP) component amplitudes. This study examined the mechanism underpinning these...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Steiner, Genevieve Z., Barry, Robert J., Gonsalvez, Craig J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4928448/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27445774
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2016.00339
_version_ 1782440443512881152
author Steiner, Genevieve Z.
Barry, Robert J.
Gonsalvez, Craig J.
author_facet Steiner, Genevieve Z.
Barry, Robert J.
Gonsalvez, Craig J.
author_sort Steiner, Genevieve Z.
collection PubMed
description In oddball tasks, increasing the time between stimuli within a particular condition (target-to-target interval, TTI; nontarget-to-nontarget interval, NNI) systematically enhances N1, P2, and P300 event-related potential (ERP) component amplitudes. This study examined the mechanism underpinning these effects in ERP components recorded from 28 adults who completed a conventional three-tone oddball task. Bivariate correlations, partial correlations and multiple regression explored component changes due to preceding ERP component amplitudes and intervals found within the stimulus series, rather than constraining the task with experimentally constructed intervals, which has been adequately explored in prior studies. Multiple regression showed that for targets, N1 and TTI predicted N2, TTI predicted P3a and P3b, and Processing Negativity (PN), P3b, and TTI predicted reaction time. For rare nontargets, P1 predicted N1, NNI predicted N2, and N1 predicted Slow Wave (SW). Findings show that the mechanism is operating on separate stages of stimulus-processing, suggestive of either increased activation within a number of stimulus-specific pathways, or very long component generator recovery cycles. These results demonstrate the extent to which matching-stimulus intervals influence ERP component amplitudes and behavior in a three-tone oddball task, and should be taken into account when designing similar studies.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4928448
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-49284482016-07-21 Sequential Processing and the Matching-Stimulus Interval Effect in ERP Components: An Exploration of the Mechanism Using Multiple Regression Steiner, Genevieve Z. Barry, Robert J. Gonsalvez, Craig J. Front Hum Neurosci Neuroscience In oddball tasks, increasing the time between stimuli within a particular condition (target-to-target interval, TTI; nontarget-to-nontarget interval, NNI) systematically enhances N1, P2, and P300 event-related potential (ERP) component amplitudes. This study examined the mechanism underpinning these effects in ERP components recorded from 28 adults who completed a conventional three-tone oddball task. Bivariate correlations, partial correlations and multiple regression explored component changes due to preceding ERP component amplitudes and intervals found within the stimulus series, rather than constraining the task with experimentally constructed intervals, which has been adequately explored in prior studies. Multiple regression showed that for targets, N1 and TTI predicted N2, TTI predicted P3a and P3b, and Processing Negativity (PN), P3b, and TTI predicted reaction time. For rare nontargets, P1 predicted N1, NNI predicted N2, and N1 predicted Slow Wave (SW). Findings show that the mechanism is operating on separate stages of stimulus-processing, suggestive of either increased activation within a number of stimulus-specific pathways, or very long component generator recovery cycles. These results demonstrate the extent to which matching-stimulus intervals influence ERP component amplitudes and behavior in a three-tone oddball task, and should be taken into account when designing similar studies. Frontiers Media S.A. 2016-06-30 /pmc/articles/PMC4928448/ /pubmed/27445774 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2016.00339 Text en Copyright © 2016 Steiner, Barry and Gonsalvez. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Neuroscience
Steiner, Genevieve Z.
Barry, Robert J.
Gonsalvez, Craig J.
Sequential Processing and the Matching-Stimulus Interval Effect in ERP Components: An Exploration of the Mechanism Using Multiple Regression
title Sequential Processing and the Matching-Stimulus Interval Effect in ERP Components: An Exploration of the Mechanism Using Multiple Regression
title_full Sequential Processing and the Matching-Stimulus Interval Effect in ERP Components: An Exploration of the Mechanism Using Multiple Regression
title_fullStr Sequential Processing and the Matching-Stimulus Interval Effect in ERP Components: An Exploration of the Mechanism Using Multiple Regression
title_full_unstemmed Sequential Processing and the Matching-Stimulus Interval Effect in ERP Components: An Exploration of the Mechanism Using Multiple Regression
title_short Sequential Processing and the Matching-Stimulus Interval Effect in ERP Components: An Exploration of the Mechanism Using Multiple Regression
title_sort sequential processing and the matching-stimulus interval effect in erp components: an exploration of the mechanism using multiple regression
topic Neuroscience
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4928448/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27445774
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2016.00339
work_keys_str_mv AT steinergenevievez sequentialprocessingandthematchingstimulusintervaleffectinerpcomponentsanexplorationofthemechanismusingmultipleregression
AT barryrobertj sequentialprocessingandthematchingstimulusintervaleffectinerpcomponentsanexplorationofthemechanismusingmultipleregression
AT gonsalvezcraigj sequentialprocessingandthematchingstimulusintervaleffectinerpcomponentsanexplorationofthemechanismusingmultipleregression