Cargando…
Prevention of clinically important deteriorations in COPD with umeclidinium/vilanterol
BACKGROUND: Minimizing the risk of disease progression and exacerbations is the key goal of COPD management, as these are well-established indicators of poor COPD prognosis. We developed a novel composite end point assessing three important aspects (lung function, health status, and exacerbations) o...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Dove Medical Press
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4928660/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27445468 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/COPD.S101612 |
_version_ | 1782440474086211584 |
---|---|
author | Singh, Dave Maleki-Yazdi, M Reza Tombs, Lee Iqbal, Ahmar Fahy, William A Naya, Ian |
author_facet | Singh, Dave Maleki-Yazdi, M Reza Tombs, Lee Iqbal, Ahmar Fahy, William A Naya, Ian |
author_sort | Singh, Dave |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Minimizing the risk of disease progression and exacerbations is the key goal of COPD management, as these are well-established indicators of poor COPD prognosis. We developed a novel composite end point assessing three important aspects (lung function, health status, and exacerbations) of worsening in COPD. The objective was to determine whether dual bronchodilation with umeclidinium/vilanterol (UMEC/VI) reduces clinically important deteriorations (CIDs) in COPD versus placebo or bronchodilator monotherapy. METHODS: This study is a post hoc analysis of two 24-week trials comparing UMEC/VI 62.5/25 µg with UMEC 62.5 µg, VI 25 µg, or placebo (Study A; NCT01313650), or UMEC/VI 62.5/25 µg with tiotropium (TIO) 18 µg (Study B; NCT01777334) in patients with symptomatic COPD, without a history of frequent exacerbations. Deterioration was assessed as the time to a first CID, a composite measure defined as a decrease of ≥100 mL in trough forced expiratory volume in 1 second or ≥4-unit increase in St George’s Respiratory Questionnaire total score or an on-treatment moderate-to-severe COPD exacerbation. RESULTS: In Study A, fewer patients experienced a first CID with UMEC/VI (44%) versus UMEC (50%), VI (56%), and placebo (75%). The risk of a first CID was reduced with UMEC/VI (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.37 [95% confidence interval, CI: 0.30, 0.45]), UMEC (HR: 0.46 [95% CI: 0.38, 0.56]), and VI (HR: 0.55 [95% CI: 0.45, 0.66]; all P<0.001) versus placebo, and with UMEC/VI versus UMEC (HR: 0.80 [95% CI: 0.65, 0.97]; P<0.05) and versus VI (HR: 0.67 [95% CI: 0.55, 0.81]; P<0.001). In Study B, fewer patients experienced a first CID with UMEC/VI (41%) versus TIO (59%). UMEC/VI reduced the risk of a first composite CID by 43% versus TIO (HR: 0.57 [95% CI: 0.47, 0.69]; P<0.001). CONCLUSION: This exploratory analysis, using a new assessment of clinical deterioration in COPD, revealed that a majority of symptomatic patients with low exacerbation risk experienced a deterioration during the 24-week study periods. UMEC/VI reduces the risk of a first CID versus placebo or bronchodilator monotherapy. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4928660 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Dove Medical Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-49286602016-07-21 Prevention of clinically important deteriorations in COPD with umeclidinium/vilanterol Singh, Dave Maleki-Yazdi, M Reza Tombs, Lee Iqbal, Ahmar Fahy, William A Naya, Ian Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis Original Research BACKGROUND: Minimizing the risk of disease progression and exacerbations is the key goal of COPD management, as these are well-established indicators of poor COPD prognosis. We developed a novel composite end point assessing three important aspects (lung function, health status, and exacerbations) of worsening in COPD. The objective was to determine whether dual bronchodilation with umeclidinium/vilanterol (UMEC/VI) reduces clinically important deteriorations (CIDs) in COPD versus placebo or bronchodilator monotherapy. METHODS: This study is a post hoc analysis of two 24-week trials comparing UMEC/VI 62.5/25 µg with UMEC 62.5 µg, VI 25 µg, or placebo (Study A; NCT01313650), or UMEC/VI 62.5/25 µg with tiotropium (TIO) 18 µg (Study B; NCT01777334) in patients with symptomatic COPD, without a history of frequent exacerbations. Deterioration was assessed as the time to a first CID, a composite measure defined as a decrease of ≥100 mL in trough forced expiratory volume in 1 second or ≥4-unit increase in St George’s Respiratory Questionnaire total score or an on-treatment moderate-to-severe COPD exacerbation. RESULTS: In Study A, fewer patients experienced a first CID with UMEC/VI (44%) versus UMEC (50%), VI (56%), and placebo (75%). The risk of a first CID was reduced with UMEC/VI (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.37 [95% confidence interval, CI: 0.30, 0.45]), UMEC (HR: 0.46 [95% CI: 0.38, 0.56]), and VI (HR: 0.55 [95% CI: 0.45, 0.66]; all P<0.001) versus placebo, and with UMEC/VI versus UMEC (HR: 0.80 [95% CI: 0.65, 0.97]; P<0.05) and versus VI (HR: 0.67 [95% CI: 0.55, 0.81]; P<0.001). In Study B, fewer patients experienced a first CID with UMEC/VI (41%) versus TIO (59%). UMEC/VI reduced the risk of a first composite CID by 43% versus TIO (HR: 0.57 [95% CI: 0.47, 0.69]; P<0.001). CONCLUSION: This exploratory analysis, using a new assessment of clinical deterioration in COPD, revealed that a majority of symptomatic patients with low exacerbation risk experienced a deterioration during the 24-week study periods. UMEC/VI reduces the risk of a first CID versus placebo or bronchodilator monotherapy. Dove Medical Press 2016-06-24 /pmc/articles/PMC4928660/ /pubmed/27445468 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/COPD.S101612 Text en © 2016 Singh et al. This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Singh, Dave Maleki-Yazdi, M Reza Tombs, Lee Iqbal, Ahmar Fahy, William A Naya, Ian Prevention of clinically important deteriorations in COPD with umeclidinium/vilanterol |
title | Prevention of clinically important deteriorations in COPD with umeclidinium/vilanterol |
title_full | Prevention of clinically important deteriorations in COPD with umeclidinium/vilanterol |
title_fullStr | Prevention of clinically important deteriorations in COPD with umeclidinium/vilanterol |
title_full_unstemmed | Prevention of clinically important deteriorations in COPD with umeclidinium/vilanterol |
title_short | Prevention of clinically important deteriorations in COPD with umeclidinium/vilanterol |
title_sort | prevention of clinically important deteriorations in copd with umeclidinium/vilanterol |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4928660/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27445468 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/COPD.S101612 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT singhdave preventionofclinicallyimportantdeteriorationsincopdwithumeclidiniumvilanterol AT malekiyazdimreza preventionofclinicallyimportantdeteriorationsincopdwithumeclidiniumvilanterol AT tombslee preventionofclinicallyimportantdeteriorationsincopdwithumeclidiniumvilanterol AT iqbalahmar preventionofclinicallyimportantdeteriorationsincopdwithumeclidiniumvilanterol AT fahywilliama preventionofclinicallyimportantdeteriorationsincopdwithumeclidiniumvilanterol AT nayaian preventionofclinicallyimportantdeteriorationsincopdwithumeclidiniumvilanterol |