Cargando…

Time Savings with Rituximab Subcutaneous Injection versus Rituximab Intravenous Infusion: A Time and Motion Study in Eight Countries

BACKGROUND: Rituximab is a standard treatment for non-Hodgkin lymphoma. The SABRINA trial (NCT01200758) showed that a subcutaneous (SC) rituximab formulation did not compromise efficacy or safety compared with intravenous (IV) infusion. We aimed to quantify active healthcare professional (HCP) time...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: De Cock, Erwin, Kritikou, Persefoni, Sandoval, Mariana, Tao, Sunning, Wiesner, Christof, Carella, Angelo Michele, Ngoh, Charles, Waterboer, Tim
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4928781/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27362533
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0157957
_version_ 1782440492406931456
author De Cock, Erwin
Kritikou, Persefoni
Sandoval, Mariana
Tao, Sunning
Wiesner, Christof
Carella, Angelo Michele
Ngoh, Charles
Waterboer, Tim
author_facet De Cock, Erwin
Kritikou, Persefoni
Sandoval, Mariana
Tao, Sunning
Wiesner, Christof
Carella, Angelo Michele
Ngoh, Charles
Waterboer, Tim
author_sort De Cock, Erwin
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Rituximab is a standard treatment for non-Hodgkin lymphoma. The SABRINA trial (NCT01200758) showed that a subcutaneous (SC) rituximab formulation did not compromise efficacy or safety compared with intravenous (IV) infusion. We aimed to quantify active healthcare professional (HCP) time and patient chair time for rituximab SC and IV, including potential time savings. METHODS: This non-interventional time and motion study was run in eight countries and 30 day oncology units. Rituximab SC data were collected alongside the MabCute trial (NCT01461928); IV data were collected per routine real-world practice. Trained observers recorded active HCP time for pre-specified tasks (stopwatch) and chair time (time of day). A random intercept model was used to analyze active HCP time (by task and for all tasks combined) in the treatment room and drug preparation area, drug administration duration, chair time and patient treatment room time by country and/or across countries. Active HCP and chair time were extrapolated to a patient’s first year of treatment (11 rituximab sessions). RESULTS: Mean active HCP time was 35.0 and 23.7 minutes for IV and SC process, respectively (-32%, p <0.0001). By country, relative reduction in time was 27–58%. Absolute reduction in extrapolated active HCP time (first year of treatment) was 1.1–5.2 hours. Mean chair time was 262.1 minutes for IV, including 180.9 minutes infusion duration, vs. 67.3 minutes for SC, including 8.3 minutes SC injection administration (-74%, p <0.0001). By country, relative reduction was 53–91%. Absolute reduction in extrapolated chair time for the first year of treatment was 3.1–5.5 eight-hour days. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with rituximab IV, rituximab SC was associated with reduced chair time and active HCP time. The latter could be invested in other activities, whereas the former may lead to more available appointments, reducing waiting lists and increasing the efficiency of day oncology units. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01200758
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4928781
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-49287812016-07-18 Time Savings with Rituximab Subcutaneous Injection versus Rituximab Intravenous Infusion: A Time and Motion Study in Eight Countries De Cock, Erwin Kritikou, Persefoni Sandoval, Mariana Tao, Sunning Wiesner, Christof Carella, Angelo Michele Ngoh, Charles Waterboer, Tim PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Rituximab is a standard treatment for non-Hodgkin lymphoma. The SABRINA trial (NCT01200758) showed that a subcutaneous (SC) rituximab formulation did not compromise efficacy or safety compared with intravenous (IV) infusion. We aimed to quantify active healthcare professional (HCP) time and patient chair time for rituximab SC and IV, including potential time savings. METHODS: This non-interventional time and motion study was run in eight countries and 30 day oncology units. Rituximab SC data were collected alongside the MabCute trial (NCT01461928); IV data were collected per routine real-world practice. Trained observers recorded active HCP time for pre-specified tasks (stopwatch) and chair time (time of day). A random intercept model was used to analyze active HCP time (by task and for all tasks combined) in the treatment room and drug preparation area, drug administration duration, chair time and patient treatment room time by country and/or across countries. Active HCP and chair time were extrapolated to a patient’s first year of treatment (11 rituximab sessions). RESULTS: Mean active HCP time was 35.0 and 23.7 minutes for IV and SC process, respectively (-32%, p <0.0001). By country, relative reduction in time was 27–58%. Absolute reduction in extrapolated active HCP time (first year of treatment) was 1.1–5.2 hours. Mean chair time was 262.1 minutes for IV, including 180.9 minutes infusion duration, vs. 67.3 minutes for SC, including 8.3 minutes SC injection administration (-74%, p <0.0001). By country, relative reduction was 53–91%. Absolute reduction in extrapolated chair time for the first year of treatment was 3.1–5.5 eight-hour days. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with rituximab IV, rituximab SC was associated with reduced chair time and active HCP time. The latter could be invested in other activities, whereas the former may lead to more available appointments, reducing waiting lists and increasing the efficiency of day oncology units. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01200758 Public Library of Science 2016-06-30 /pmc/articles/PMC4928781/ /pubmed/27362533 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0157957 Text en © 2016 De Cock et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
De Cock, Erwin
Kritikou, Persefoni
Sandoval, Mariana
Tao, Sunning
Wiesner, Christof
Carella, Angelo Michele
Ngoh, Charles
Waterboer, Tim
Time Savings with Rituximab Subcutaneous Injection versus Rituximab Intravenous Infusion: A Time and Motion Study in Eight Countries
title Time Savings with Rituximab Subcutaneous Injection versus Rituximab Intravenous Infusion: A Time and Motion Study in Eight Countries
title_full Time Savings with Rituximab Subcutaneous Injection versus Rituximab Intravenous Infusion: A Time and Motion Study in Eight Countries
title_fullStr Time Savings with Rituximab Subcutaneous Injection versus Rituximab Intravenous Infusion: A Time and Motion Study in Eight Countries
title_full_unstemmed Time Savings with Rituximab Subcutaneous Injection versus Rituximab Intravenous Infusion: A Time and Motion Study in Eight Countries
title_short Time Savings with Rituximab Subcutaneous Injection versus Rituximab Intravenous Infusion: A Time and Motion Study in Eight Countries
title_sort time savings with rituximab subcutaneous injection versus rituximab intravenous infusion: a time and motion study in eight countries
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4928781/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27362533
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0157957
work_keys_str_mv AT decockerwin timesavingswithrituximabsubcutaneousinjectionversusrituximabintravenousinfusionatimeandmotionstudyineightcountries
AT kritikoupersefoni timesavingswithrituximabsubcutaneousinjectionversusrituximabintravenousinfusionatimeandmotionstudyineightcountries
AT sandovalmariana timesavingswithrituximabsubcutaneousinjectionversusrituximabintravenousinfusionatimeandmotionstudyineightcountries
AT taosunning timesavingswithrituximabsubcutaneousinjectionversusrituximabintravenousinfusionatimeandmotionstudyineightcountries
AT wiesnerchristof timesavingswithrituximabsubcutaneousinjectionversusrituximabintravenousinfusionatimeandmotionstudyineightcountries
AT carellaangelomichele timesavingswithrituximabsubcutaneousinjectionversusrituximabintravenousinfusionatimeandmotionstudyineightcountries
AT ngohcharles timesavingswithrituximabsubcutaneousinjectionversusrituximabintravenousinfusionatimeandmotionstudyineightcountries
AT waterboertim timesavingswithrituximabsubcutaneousinjectionversusrituximabintravenousinfusionatimeandmotionstudyineightcountries