Cargando…

Cost Utility of Omalizumab Compared with Standard of Care for the Treatment of Chronic Spontaneous Urticaria

BACKGROUND: Chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU) negatively impacts patient quality of life and productivity and is associated with considerable indirect costs to society. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to assess the cost utility of add-on omalizumab treatment compared with standard of care (SO...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Graham, Jonathan, McBride, Doreen, Stull, Donald, Halliday, Anna, Alexopoulos, Stamatia Theodora, Balp, Maria-Magdalena, Griffiths, Matthew, Agirrezabal, Ion, Zuberbier, Torsten, Brennan, Alan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4929169/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27209583
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40273-016-0412-1
_version_ 1782440566975365120
author Graham, Jonathan
McBride, Doreen
Stull, Donald
Halliday, Anna
Alexopoulos, Stamatia Theodora
Balp, Maria-Magdalena
Griffiths, Matthew
Agirrezabal, Ion
Zuberbier, Torsten
Brennan, Alan
author_facet Graham, Jonathan
McBride, Doreen
Stull, Donald
Halliday, Anna
Alexopoulos, Stamatia Theodora
Balp, Maria-Magdalena
Griffiths, Matthew
Agirrezabal, Ion
Zuberbier, Torsten
Brennan, Alan
author_sort Graham, Jonathan
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU) negatively impacts patient quality of life and productivity and is associated with considerable indirect costs to society. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to assess the cost utility of add-on omalizumab treatment compared with standard of care (SOC) in moderate or severe CSU patients with inadequate response to SOC, from the UK societal perspective. METHODS: A Markov model was developed, consisting of health states based on Urticaria Activity Score over 7 days (UAS7) and additional states for relapse, spontaneous remission and death. Model cycle length was 4 weeks, and total model time horizon was 20 years in the base case. The model considered early discontinuation of non-responders (response: UAS7 ≤6) and retreatment upon relapse (relapse: UAS7 ≥16) for responders. Clinical and cost inputs were derived from omalizumab trials and published sources, and cost utility was expressed as incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs). Scenario analyses included no early discontinuation of non-responders and an altered definition of response (UAS7 <16). RESULTS: With a deterministic ICER of £3183 in the base case, omalizumab was associated with increased costs and benefits relative to SOC. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis supported this result. Productivity inputs were key model drivers, and individual scenarios without early discontinuation of non-responders and adjusted response definitions had little impact on results. ICERs were generally robust to changes in key model parameters and inputs. CONCLUSIONS: In this, the first economic evaluation of omalizumab in CSU from a UK societal perspective, omalizumab consistently represented a treatment option with societal benefit for CSU in the UK across a range of scenarios. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s40273-016-0412-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4929169
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-49291692016-07-13 Cost Utility of Omalizumab Compared with Standard of Care for the Treatment of Chronic Spontaneous Urticaria Graham, Jonathan McBride, Doreen Stull, Donald Halliday, Anna Alexopoulos, Stamatia Theodora Balp, Maria-Magdalena Griffiths, Matthew Agirrezabal, Ion Zuberbier, Torsten Brennan, Alan Pharmacoeconomics Original Research Article BACKGROUND: Chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU) negatively impacts patient quality of life and productivity and is associated with considerable indirect costs to society. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to assess the cost utility of add-on omalizumab treatment compared with standard of care (SOC) in moderate or severe CSU patients with inadequate response to SOC, from the UK societal perspective. METHODS: A Markov model was developed, consisting of health states based on Urticaria Activity Score over 7 days (UAS7) and additional states for relapse, spontaneous remission and death. Model cycle length was 4 weeks, and total model time horizon was 20 years in the base case. The model considered early discontinuation of non-responders (response: UAS7 ≤6) and retreatment upon relapse (relapse: UAS7 ≥16) for responders. Clinical and cost inputs were derived from omalizumab trials and published sources, and cost utility was expressed as incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs). Scenario analyses included no early discontinuation of non-responders and an altered definition of response (UAS7 <16). RESULTS: With a deterministic ICER of £3183 in the base case, omalizumab was associated with increased costs and benefits relative to SOC. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis supported this result. Productivity inputs were key model drivers, and individual scenarios without early discontinuation of non-responders and adjusted response definitions had little impact on results. ICERs were generally robust to changes in key model parameters and inputs. CONCLUSIONS: In this, the first economic evaluation of omalizumab in CSU from a UK societal perspective, omalizumab consistently represented a treatment option with societal benefit for CSU in the UK across a range of scenarios. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s40273-016-0412-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer International Publishing 2016-05-21 2016 /pmc/articles/PMC4929169/ /pubmed/27209583 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40273-016-0412-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Original Research Article
Graham, Jonathan
McBride, Doreen
Stull, Donald
Halliday, Anna
Alexopoulos, Stamatia Theodora
Balp, Maria-Magdalena
Griffiths, Matthew
Agirrezabal, Ion
Zuberbier, Torsten
Brennan, Alan
Cost Utility of Omalizumab Compared with Standard of Care for the Treatment of Chronic Spontaneous Urticaria
title Cost Utility of Omalizumab Compared with Standard of Care for the Treatment of Chronic Spontaneous Urticaria
title_full Cost Utility of Omalizumab Compared with Standard of Care for the Treatment of Chronic Spontaneous Urticaria
title_fullStr Cost Utility of Omalizumab Compared with Standard of Care for the Treatment of Chronic Spontaneous Urticaria
title_full_unstemmed Cost Utility of Omalizumab Compared with Standard of Care for the Treatment of Chronic Spontaneous Urticaria
title_short Cost Utility of Omalizumab Compared with Standard of Care for the Treatment of Chronic Spontaneous Urticaria
title_sort cost utility of omalizumab compared with standard of care for the treatment of chronic spontaneous urticaria
topic Original Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4929169/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27209583
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40273-016-0412-1
work_keys_str_mv AT grahamjonathan costutilityofomalizumabcomparedwithstandardofcareforthetreatmentofchronicspontaneousurticaria
AT mcbridedoreen costutilityofomalizumabcomparedwithstandardofcareforthetreatmentofchronicspontaneousurticaria
AT stulldonald costutilityofomalizumabcomparedwithstandardofcareforthetreatmentofchronicspontaneousurticaria
AT hallidayanna costutilityofomalizumabcomparedwithstandardofcareforthetreatmentofchronicspontaneousurticaria
AT alexopoulosstamatiatheodora costutilityofomalizumabcomparedwithstandardofcareforthetreatmentofchronicspontaneousurticaria
AT balpmariamagdalena costutilityofomalizumabcomparedwithstandardofcareforthetreatmentofchronicspontaneousurticaria
AT griffithsmatthew costutilityofomalizumabcomparedwithstandardofcareforthetreatmentofchronicspontaneousurticaria
AT agirrezabalion costutilityofomalizumabcomparedwithstandardofcareforthetreatmentofchronicspontaneousurticaria
AT zuberbiertorsten costutilityofomalizumabcomparedwithstandardofcareforthetreatmentofchronicspontaneousurticaria
AT brennanalan costutilityofomalizumabcomparedwithstandardofcareforthetreatmentofchronicspontaneousurticaria