Cargando…

Implications of a clinical medication review and a pharmaceutical care plan of polypharmacy patients with a cardiovascular disorder

Background A clinical medication review, including patient involvement, is expected to improve pharmaceutical care. Objective To determine whether a clinical medication review followed by a pharmaceutical care plan decreases the number of potential drug-related problems (DRPs) and pharmaceutical car...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Geurts, Marlies M. E., Stewart, Roy E., Brouwers, Jacobus R. B. J., de Graeff, Pieter A., de Gier, Johan J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4929171/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27052212
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11096-016-0281-x
_version_ 1782440567429398528
author Geurts, Marlies M. E.
Stewart, Roy E.
Brouwers, Jacobus R. B. J.
de Graeff, Pieter A.
de Gier, Johan J.
author_facet Geurts, Marlies M. E.
Stewart, Roy E.
Brouwers, Jacobus R. B. J.
de Graeff, Pieter A.
de Gier, Johan J.
author_sort Geurts, Marlies M. E.
collection PubMed
description Background A clinical medication review, including patient involvement, is expected to improve pharmaceutical care. Objective To determine whether a clinical medication review followed by a pharmaceutical care plan decreases the number of potential drug-related problems (DRPs) and pharmaceutical care issues (PCIs) and leads to a positive effect on relevant clinical and laboratory parameters for elderly cardiovascular patients with multiple drug use. Setting Randomized controlled trial in eight primary care settings in the Netherlands. Method Elderly polypharmacy patients with a cardiovascular disorder were randomized into two groups. Intervention patients received a clinical medication review, followed by a pharmaceutical care plan developed in cooperation between these patients’ pharmacists and general practitioners (GPs), and agreed to by the patients. Control patients received care as usual. Patient data were collected at the start of the study (t = 0) and after 1-year follow-up (t = 1). Main outcome measure Decrease in potential DRPs and pharmaceutical PCIs, improvement of clinical and laboratory parameters. Results 512 patients were included. An average of 2.2 potential DRPs and pharmaceutical PCIs were defined per patient in the intervention group. After 1-year follow-up, 47.2 % of potential DRPs and PCIs were resolved. In total, 156 care interventions were proposed (0.9/patient), 108 of which were implemented after 1 year (69.2 %). For control-group patients, a total of 47 proposed care interventions were documented for 255 patients (0.2/patient); after 1 year, 43 had been implemented (91.5 %). The study intervention (p < 0.001) and the number of medicines used (p = 0.030) had a significant effect on the number of interventions proposed. Small biochemical changes in cardiovascular risk factors did occur, but the differences were small and not considered clinically relevant. Conclusion The integrated use of a clinical medication review with a pharmaceutical care plan in a primary care setting supports the detection of and decrease in DRPs and pharmaceutical PCIs in almost half of the patients. Its benefit in terms of control of cardiovascular risk factors and safety parameters was relatively low. Risk stratification might be necessary to decide which patients might benefit most from this type of intervention.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4929171
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-49291712016-07-13 Implications of a clinical medication review and a pharmaceutical care plan of polypharmacy patients with a cardiovascular disorder Geurts, Marlies M. E. Stewart, Roy E. Brouwers, Jacobus R. B. J. de Graeff, Pieter A. de Gier, Johan J. Int J Clin Pharm Research Article Background A clinical medication review, including patient involvement, is expected to improve pharmaceutical care. Objective To determine whether a clinical medication review followed by a pharmaceutical care plan decreases the number of potential drug-related problems (DRPs) and pharmaceutical care issues (PCIs) and leads to a positive effect on relevant clinical and laboratory parameters for elderly cardiovascular patients with multiple drug use. Setting Randomized controlled trial in eight primary care settings in the Netherlands. Method Elderly polypharmacy patients with a cardiovascular disorder were randomized into two groups. Intervention patients received a clinical medication review, followed by a pharmaceutical care plan developed in cooperation between these patients’ pharmacists and general practitioners (GPs), and agreed to by the patients. Control patients received care as usual. Patient data were collected at the start of the study (t = 0) and after 1-year follow-up (t = 1). Main outcome measure Decrease in potential DRPs and pharmaceutical PCIs, improvement of clinical and laboratory parameters. Results 512 patients were included. An average of 2.2 potential DRPs and pharmaceutical PCIs were defined per patient in the intervention group. After 1-year follow-up, 47.2 % of potential DRPs and PCIs were resolved. In total, 156 care interventions were proposed (0.9/patient), 108 of which were implemented after 1 year (69.2 %). For control-group patients, a total of 47 proposed care interventions were documented for 255 patients (0.2/patient); after 1 year, 43 had been implemented (91.5 %). The study intervention (p < 0.001) and the number of medicines used (p = 0.030) had a significant effect on the number of interventions proposed. Small biochemical changes in cardiovascular risk factors did occur, but the differences were small and not considered clinically relevant. Conclusion The integrated use of a clinical medication review with a pharmaceutical care plan in a primary care setting supports the detection of and decrease in DRPs and pharmaceutical PCIs in almost half of the patients. Its benefit in terms of control of cardiovascular risk factors and safety parameters was relatively low. Risk stratification might be necessary to decide which patients might benefit most from this type of intervention. Springer International Publishing 2016-04-06 2016 /pmc/articles/PMC4929171/ /pubmed/27052212 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11096-016-0281-x Text en © The Author(s) 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Research Article
Geurts, Marlies M. E.
Stewart, Roy E.
Brouwers, Jacobus R. B. J.
de Graeff, Pieter A.
de Gier, Johan J.
Implications of a clinical medication review and a pharmaceutical care plan of polypharmacy patients with a cardiovascular disorder
title Implications of a clinical medication review and a pharmaceutical care plan of polypharmacy patients with a cardiovascular disorder
title_full Implications of a clinical medication review and a pharmaceutical care plan of polypharmacy patients with a cardiovascular disorder
title_fullStr Implications of a clinical medication review and a pharmaceutical care plan of polypharmacy patients with a cardiovascular disorder
title_full_unstemmed Implications of a clinical medication review and a pharmaceutical care plan of polypharmacy patients with a cardiovascular disorder
title_short Implications of a clinical medication review and a pharmaceutical care plan of polypharmacy patients with a cardiovascular disorder
title_sort implications of a clinical medication review and a pharmaceutical care plan of polypharmacy patients with a cardiovascular disorder
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4929171/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27052212
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11096-016-0281-x
work_keys_str_mv AT geurtsmarliesme implicationsofaclinicalmedicationreviewandapharmaceuticalcareplanofpolypharmacypatientswithacardiovasculardisorder
AT stewartroye implicationsofaclinicalmedicationreviewandapharmaceuticalcareplanofpolypharmacypatientswithacardiovasculardisorder
AT brouwersjacobusrbj implicationsofaclinicalmedicationreviewandapharmaceuticalcareplanofpolypharmacypatientswithacardiovasculardisorder
AT degraeffpietera implicationsofaclinicalmedicationreviewandapharmaceuticalcareplanofpolypharmacypatientswithacardiovasculardisorder
AT degierjohanj implicationsofaclinicalmedicationreviewandapharmaceuticalcareplanofpolypharmacypatientswithacardiovasculardisorder