Cargando…

Breast Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Assessment of Internal Mammary Lymph Node Status in Breast Cancer

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to assess magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) features of malignant internal mammary lymph nodes (IMLNs) and benign IMLNs in breast cancer patients. METHODS: From 2009 to 2014, the records of 85 patients with IMLNs were archived using MRI report data; 26 patients...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lee, Hyung Won, Kim, Sung Hun
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Korean Breast Cancer Society 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4929261/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27382396
http://dx.doi.org/10.4048/jbc.2016.19.2.191
_version_ 1782440580752605184
author Lee, Hyung Won
Kim, Sung Hun
author_facet Lee, Hyung Won
Kim, Sung Hun
author_sort Lee, Hyung Won
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to assess magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) features of malignant internal mammary lymph nodes (IMLNs) and benign IMLNs in breast cancer patients. METHODS: From 2009 to 2014, the records of 85 patients with IMLNs were archived using MRI report data; 26 patients with small size (long axis diameter <5 mm) nodes were subsequently excluded. The current study evaluated internal mammary lymph nodes in 59 patients who underwent breast MRI for breast cancer staging and for posttherapy follow-up. All MRI findings were retrospectively evaluated. Malignancy was determined based on pathologic examination and positron emission tomography computed tomography findings. Independent t-tests, Mann-Whitney U tests, chi-square tests, and receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve analysis were used. RESULTS: Among MRI features, there were statistically significant differences between benign and malignant IMLN groups, in short axis length (3.6±1.3 vs. 8.2±2.9 mm, respectively), long axis length (8.1±2.4 vs. 14.5±4.8 mm, respectively), short/long axis ratio (0.45±0.10 vs. 0.59±0.17, respectively), absent fatty hilum (mean, 0% vs. 95%, respectively), and restricted diffusion (15.8% vs. 85.0%, respectively) (p<0.050). Multiplicity and location of intercostal spaces was not different between the two groups. Short axis length was the most discriminative variable for predicting metastatic nodes (area under the ROC curve, 0.951; threshold, 4 mm; sensitivity, 92.5%; specificity, 84.2%). CONCLUSION: Conventional MRI and diffusion-weighted MRI are helpful to detect metastasis of internal mammary lymph nodes in breast cancer.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4929261
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Korean Breast Cancer Society
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-49292612016-07-05 Breast Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Assessment of Internal Mammary Lymph Node Status in Breast Cancer Lee, Hyung Won Kim, Sung Hun J Breast Cancer Original Article PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to assess magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) features of malignant internal mammary lymph nodes (IMLNs) and benign IMLNs in breast cancer patients. METHODS: From 2009 to 2014, the records of 85 patients with IMLNs were archived using MRI report data; 26 patients with small size (long axis diameter <5 mm) nodes were subsequently excluded. The current study evaluated internal mammary lymph nodes in 59 patients who underwent breast MRI for breast cancer staging and for posttherapy follow-up. All MRI findings were retrospectively evaluated. Malignancy was determined based on pathologic examination and positron emission tomography computed tomography findings. Independent t-tests, Mann-Whitney U tests, chi-square tests, and receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve analysis were used. RESULTS: Among MRI features, there were statistically significant differences between benign and malignant IMLN groups, in short axis length (3.6±1.3 vs. 8.2±2.9 mm, respectively), long axis length (8.1±2.4 vs. 14.5±4.8 mm, respectively), short/long axis ratio (0.45±0.10 vs. 0.59±0.17, respectively), absent fatty hilum (mean, 0% vs. 95%, respectively), and restricted diffusion (15.8% vs. 85.0%, respectively) (p<0.050). Multiplicity and location of intercostal spaces was not different between the two groups. Short axis length was the most discriminative variable for predicting metastatic nodes (area under the ROC curve, 0.951; threshold, 4 mm; sensitivity, 92.5%; specificity, 84.2%). CONCLUSION: Conventional MRI and diffusion-weighted MRI are helpful to detect metastasis of internal mammary lymph nodes in breast cancer. Korean Breast Cancer Society 2016-06 2016-06-24 /pmc/articles/PMC4929261/ /pubmed/27382396 http://dx.doi.org/10.4048/jbc.2016.19.2.191 Text en © 2016 Korean Breast Cancer Society. All rights reserved. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Lee, Hyung Won
Kim, Sung Hun
Breast Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Assessment of Internal Mammary Lymph Node Status in Breast Cancer
title Breast Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Assessment of Internal Mammary Lymph Node Status in Breast Cancer
title_full Breast Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Assessment of Internal Mammary Lymph Node Status in Breast Cancer
title_fullStr Breast Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Assessment of Internal Mammary Lymph Node Status in Breast Cancer
title_full_unstemmed Breast Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Assessment of Internal Mammary Lymph Node Status in Breast Cancer
title_short Breast Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Assessment of Internal Mammary Lymph Node Status in Breast Cancer
title_sort breast magnetic resonance imaging for assessment of internal mammary lymph node status in breast cancer
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4929261/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27382396
http://dx.doi.org/10.4048/jbc.2016.19.2.191
work_keys_str_mv AT leehyungwon breastmagneticresonanceimagingforassessmentofinternalmammarylymphnodestatusinbreastcancer
AT kimsunghun breastmagneticresonanceimagingforassessmentofinternalmammarylymphnodestatusinbreastcancer