Cargando…

Moles and Mole Control on British Farms, Amenities and Gardens after Strychnine Withdrawal

SIMPLE SUMMARY: Moles are burrowing mammals that are regarded as pests in Britain, and until 2006 they could legally be killed using strychnine poison. When strychnine was withdrawn there were fears that mole populations would increase. We surveyed farmers, amenity managers and householders about mo...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Baker, Sandra E., Ellwood, Stephen A., Johnson, Paul J., Macdonald, David W.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4929419/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27338484
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ani6060039
_version_ 1782440604089712640
author Baker, Sandra E.
Ellwood, Stephen A.
Johnson, Paul J.
Macdonald, David W.
author_facet Baker, Sandra E.
Ellwood, Stephen A.
Johnson, Paul J.
Macdonald, David W.
author_sort Baker, Sandra E.
collection PubMed
description SIMPLE SUMMARY: Moles are burrowing mammals that are regarded as pests in Britain, and until 2006 they could legally be killed using strychnine poison. When strychnine was withdrawn there were fears that mole populations would increase. We surveyed farmers, amenity managers and householders about moles and mole control on their land in 2007, post strychnine withdrawal. Kill-trapping was by far the preferred control method used and control may be used more than can be justified by damage levels or the effect of control on damage. Mole traps are unregulated, unlike most other spring traps, and some might not meet current welfare standards. We found no evidence that mole activity had increased since a 1992 survey of farms. ABSTRACT: Moles are considered pests in Britain, but this issue has been little studied. Lower welfare standards have been tolerated for moles than for most other managed wild mammal species, as use of both the controversial poison, strychnine, and unregulated traps have been permitted. Strychnine was withdrawn in 2006 and there were fears that mole populations would increase as a result. In 2007, we conducted a comprehensive, nationwide survey of land manager perceptions, opinions and behaviour regarding moles and mole control on farms, amenities and domestic gardens in Britain. We surveyed 2150 land managers (achieving a 59% response rate) and ground-truthed 29 responses. Moles were reported to be present on most farms and amenities, and 13% of gardens, and were more common in lighter soils. Where present, moles were usually considered pests, this being more likely in Wales, Scotland and northern England, on livestock and mixed farms, and on large, high-value amenities, e.g., racecourses and golf courses. Mole control followed similar patterns to mole presence. More control may occur than is economically, and therefore potentially ethically, justified. Control should be more carefully considered and, where necessary, more effectively targeted. Kill-trapping was the favoured recent and future method on farms and amenities, even if strychnine was to be reintroduced; however, because mole traps are currently unregulated, some might not meet current welfare standards if tested. We found no evidence for an increase in moles since a farm questionnaire survey conducted in 1992; this could have wider implications for future wildlife management policy changes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4929419
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-49294192016-07-07 Moles and Mole Control on British Farms, Amenities and Gardens after Strychnine Withdrawal Baker, Sandra E. Ellwood, Stephen A. Johnson, Paul J. Macdonald, David W. Animals (Basel) Article SIMPLE SUMMARY: Moles are burrowing mammals that are regarded as pests in Britain, and until 2006 they could legally be killed using strychnine poison. When strychnine was withdrawn there were fears that mole populations would increase. We surveyed farmers, amenity managers and householders about moles and mole control on their land in 2007, post strychnine withdrawal. Kill-trapping was by far the preferred control method used and control may be used more than can be justified by damage levels or the effect of control on damage. Mole traps are unregulated, unlike most other spring traps, and some might not meet current welfare standards. We found no evidence that mole activity had increased since a 1992 survey of farms. ABSTRACT: Moles are considered pests in Britain, but this issue has been little studied. Lower welfare standards have been tolerated for moles than for most other managed wild mammal species, as use of both the controversial poison, strychnine, and unregulated traps have been permitted. Strychnine was withdrawn in 2006 and there were fears that mole populations would increase as a result. In 2007, we conducted a comprehensive, nationwide survey of land manager perceptions, opinions and behaviour regarding moles and mole control on farms, amenities and domestic gardens in Britain. We surveyed 2150 land managers (achieving a 59% response rate) and ground-truthed 29 responses. Moles were reported to be present on most farms and amenities, and 13% of gardens, and were more common in lighter soils. Where present, moles were usually considered pests, this being more likely in Wales, Scotland and northern England, on livestock and mixed farms, and on large, high-value amenities, e.g., racecourses and golf courses. Mole control followed similar patterns to mole presence. More control may occur than is economically, and therefore potentially ethically, justified. Control should be more carefully considered and, where necessary, more effectively targeted. Kill-trapping was the favoured recent and future method on farms and amenities, even if strychnine was to be reintroduced; however, because mole traps are currently unregulated, some might not meet current welfare standards if tested. We found no evidence for an increase in moles since a farm questionnaire survey conducted in 1992; this could have wider implications for future wildlife management policy changes. MDPI 2016-06-08 /pmc/articles/PMC4929419/ /pubmed/27338484 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ani6060039 Text en © 2016 by the authors; licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Baker, Sandra E.
Ellwood, Stephen A.
Johnson, Paul J.
Macdonald, David W.
Moles and Mole Control on British Farms, Amenities and Gardens after Strychnine Withdrawal
title Moles and Mole Control on British Farms, Amenities and Gardens after Strychnine Withdrawal
title_full Moles and Mole Control on British Farms, Amenities and Gardens after Strychnine Withdrawal
title_fullStr Moles and Mole Control on British Farms, Amenities and Gardens after Strychnine Withdrawal
title_full_unstemmed Moles and Mole Control on British Farms, Amenities and Gardens after Strychnine Withdrawal
title_short Moles and Mole Control on British Farms, Amenities and Gardens after Strychnine Withdrawal
title_sort moles and mole control on british farms, amenities and gardens after strychnine withdrawal
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4929419/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27338484
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ani6060039
work_keys_str_mv AT bakersandrae molesandmolecontrolonbritishfarmsamenitiesandgardensafterstrychninewithdrawal
AT ellwoodstephena molesandmolecontrolonbritishfarmsamenitiesandgardensafterstrychninewithdrawal
AT johnsonpaulj molesandmolecontrolonbritishfarmsamenitiesandgardensafterstrychninewithdrawal
AT macdonalddavidw molesandmolecontrolonbritishfarmsamenitiesandgardensafterstrychninewithdrawal