Cargando…

Contradiction and Complacency Shape Attitudes towards the Toll of Roads on Wildlife

SIMPLE SUMMARY: Mitigating the toll of roads on wildlife can become difficult when awareness and exposure does not result in willingness to change driving behaviour. Using a self-reporting questionnaire, we found that while most drivers view wildlife vehicle collisions as a serious issue, increasing...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ramp, Daniel, Wilson, Vanessa K., Croft, David B.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4929420/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27322335
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ani6060040
_version_ 1782440604316205056
author Ramp, Daniel
Wilson, Vanessa K.
Croft, David B.
author_facet Ramp, Daniel
Wilson, Vanessa K.
Croft, David B.
author_sort Ramp, Daniel
collection PubMed
description SIMPLE SUMMARY: Mitigating the toll of roads on wildlife can become difficult when awareness and exposure does not result in willingness to change driving behaviour. Using a self-reporting questionnaire, we found that while most drivers view wildlife vehicle collisions as a serious issue, increasing exposure to collisions decreased this attitude and it did not translate into willingness to adopt additional mitigation strategies. In addition, despite most respondents stating they routinely drive slower when collision risk is high (at dusk and dawn), our assessment of driving trends via traffic speeds suggested this sentiment was not generally adhered to. We suggest that competing priorities and complacency when risk to people is low may adversely affect willingness to prevent collisions. ABSTRACT: Most people in the world now live in cities. Urbanisation simultaneously isolates people from nature and contributes to biodiversity decline. As cities expand, suburban development and the road infrastructure to support them widens their impact on wildlife. Even so, urban communities, especially those on the peri-urban fringe, endeavour to support biodiversity through wildlife friendly gardens, green spaces and corridors, and conservation estates. On one hand, many who live on city fringes do so because they enjoy proximity to nature, however, the ever increasing intrusion of roads leads to conflict with wildlife. Trauma (usually fatal) to wildlife and (usually emotional and financial) to people ensues. Exposure to this trauma, therefore, should inform attitudes towards wildlife vehicle collisions (WVC) and be linked to willingness to reduce risk of further WVC. While there is good anecdotal evidence for this response, competing priorities and better understanding of the likelihood of human injury or fatalities, as opposed to wildlife fatalities, may confound this trend. In this paper we sought to explore this relationship with a quantitative study of driver behaviour and attitudes to WVC from a cohort of residents and visitors who drive through a peri-urban reserve (Royal National Park) on the outskirts of Sydney, Australia. We distributed a self-reporting questionnaire and received responses from 105 local residents and 51 visitors to small townships accessed by roads through the national park. We sought the respondents’ exposure to WVC, their evasive actions in an impending WVC, their attitudes to wildlife fatalities, their strategies to reduce the risk of WVC, and their willingness to adopt new ameliorative measures. The results were partitioned by driver demographics and residency. Residents were generally well informed about mitigation strategies but exposure led to a decrease in viewing WVC as very serious. In addition, despite most respondents stating they routinely drive slower when collision risk is high (at dusk and dawn), our assessment of driving trends via traffic speeds suggested this sentiment was not generally adhered to. Thus we unveil some of the complexities in tackling driver’s willingness to act on reducing risk of WVC, particularly when risk of human trauma is low.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4929420
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-49294202016-07-07 Contradiction and Complacency Shape Attitudes towards the Toll of Roads on Wildlife Ramp, Daniel Wilson, Vanessa K. Croft, David B. Animals (Basel) Article SIMPLE SUMMARY: Mitigating the toll of roads on wildlife can become difficult when awareness and exposure does not result in willingness to change driving behaviour. Using a self-reporting questionnaire, we found that while most drivers view wildlife vehicle collisions as a serious issue, increasing exposure to collisions decreased this attitude and it did not translate into willingness to adopt additional mitigation strategies. In addition, despite most respondents stating they routinely drive slower when collision risk is high (at dusk and dawn), our assessment of driving trends via traffic speeds suggested this sentiment was not generally adhered to. We suggest that competing priorities and complacency when risk to people is low may adversely affect willingness to prevent collisions. ABSTRACT: Most people in the world now live in cities. Urbanisation simultaneously isolates people from nature and contributes to biodiversity decline. As cities expand, suburban development and the road infrastructure to support them widens their impact on wildlife. Even so, urban communities, especially those on the peri-urban fringe, endeavour to support biodiversity through wildlife friendly gardens, green spaces and corridors, and conservation estates. On one hand, many who live on city fringes do so because they enjoy proximity to nature, however, the ever increasing intrusion of roads leads to conflict with wildlife. Trauma (usually fatal) to wildlife and (usually emotional and financial) to people ensues. Exposure to this trauma, therefore, should inform attitudes towards wildlife vehicle collisions (WVC) and be linked to willingness to reduce risk of further WVC. While there is good anecdotal evidence for this response, competing priorities and better understanding of the likelihood of human injury or fatalities, as opposed to wildlife fatalities, may confound this trend. In this paper we sought to explore this relationship with a quantitative study of driver behaviour and attitudes to WVC from a cohort of residents and visitors who drive through a peri-urban reserve (Royal National Park) on the outskirts of Sydney, Australia. We distributed a self-reporting questionnaire and received responses from 105 local residents and 51 visitors to small townships accessed by roads through the national park. We sought the respondents’ exposure to WVC, their evasive actions in an impending WVC, their attitudes to wildlife fatalities, their strategies to reduce the risk of WVC, and their willingness to adopt new ameliorative measures. The results were partitioned by driver demographics and residency. Residents were generally well informed about mitigation strategies but exposure led to a decrease in viewing WVC as very serious. In addition, despite most respondents stating they routinely drive slower when collision risk is high (at dusk and dawn), our assessment of driving trends via traffic speeds suggested this sentiment was not generally adhered to. Thus we unveil some of the complexities in tackling driver’s willingness to act on reducing risk of WVC, particularly when risk of human trauma is low. MDPI 2016-06-17 /pmc/articles/PMC4929420/ /pubmed/27322335 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ani6060040 Text en © 2016 by the authors; licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Ramp, Daniel
Wilson, Vanessa K.
Croft, David B.
Contradiction and Complacency Shape Attitudes towards the Toll of Roads on Wildlife
title Contradiction and Complacency Shape Attitudes towards the Toll of Roads on Wildlife
title_full Contradiction and Complacency Shape Attitudes towards the Toll of Roads on Wildlife
title_fullStr Contradiction and Complacency Shape Attitudes towards the Toll of Roads on Wildlife
title_full_unstemmed Contradiction and Complacency Shape Attitudes towards the Toll of Roads on Wildlife
title_short Contradiction and Complacency Shape Attitudes towards the Toll of Roads on Wildlife
title_sort contradiction and complacency shape attitudes towards the toll of roads on wildlife
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4929420/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27322335
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ani6060040
work_keys_str_mv AT rampdaniel contradictionandcomplacencyshapeattitudestowardsthetollofroadsonwildlife
AT wilsonvanessak contradictionandcomplacencyshapeattitudestowardsthetollofroadsonwildlife
AT croftdavidb contradictionandcomplacencyshapeattitudestowardsthetollofroadsonwildlife