Cargando…

Geographical variation in the heterogeneity of mutualistic networks

Plant–animal mutualistic networks are characterized by highly heterogeneous degree distributions. The majority of species interact with few partner species, while a small number are highly connected to form network hubs that are proposed to play an important role in community stability. It has not b...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sakai, Shoko, Metelmann, Soeren, Toquenaga, Yukihiko, Telschow, Arndt
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Royal Society 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4929896/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27429761
http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsos.150630
_version_ 1782440670681628672
author Sakai, Shoko
Metelmann, Soeren
Toquenaga, Yukihiko
Telschow, Arndt
author_facet Sakai, Shoko
Metelmann, Soeren
Toquenaga, Yukihiko
Telschow, Arndt
author_sort Sakai, Shoko
collection PubMed
description Plant–animal mutualistic networks are characterized by highly heterogeneous degree distributions. The majority of species interact with few partner species, while a small number are highly connected to form network hubs that are proposed to play an important role in community stability. It has not been investigated, however, if or how the degree distributions vary among types of mutualisms or communities, or between plants and animals in the same network. Here, we evaluate the degree distributions of pollination and seed-dispersal networks, which are two major types of mutualistic networks that have often been discussed in parallel, using an index based on Pielou's evenness. Among 56 pollination networks we found strong negative correlation of the heterogeneity between plants and animals, and geographical shifts of network hubs from plants in temperate regions to animals in the tropics. For 28 seed-dispersal networks, by contrast, the correlation was positive, and there is no comparable geographical pattern. These results may be explained by evolution towards specialization in the presence of context-dependent costs that occur if plants share the animal species as interaction partner. How the identity of network hubs affects the stability and resilience of the community is an important question for future studies.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4929896
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher The Royal Society
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-49298962016-07-15 Geographical variation in the heterogeneity of mutualistic networks Sakai, Shoko Metelmann, Soeren Toquenaga, Yukihiko Telschow, Arndt R Soc Open Sci Biology (Whole Organism) Plant–animal mutualistic networks are characterized by highly heterogeneous degree distributions. The majority of species interact with few partner species, while a small number are highly connected to form network hubs that are proposed to play an important role in community stability. It has not been investigated, however, if or how the degree distributions vary among types of mutualisms or communities, or between plants and animals in the same network. Here, we evaluate the degree distributions of pollination and seed-dispersal networks, which are two major types of mutualistic networks that have often been discussed in parallel, using an index based on Pielou's evenness. Among 56 pollination networks we found strong negative correlation of the heterogeneity between plants and animals, and geographical shifts of network hubs from plants in temperate regions to animals in the tropics. For 28 seed-dispersal networks, by contrast, the correlation was positive, and there is no comparable geographical pattern. These results may be explained by evolution towards specialization in the presence of context-dependent costs that occur if plants share the animal species as interaction partner. How the identity of network hubs affects the stability and resilience of the community is an important question for future studies. The Royal Society 2016-06-08 /pmc/articles/PMC4929896/ /pubmed/27429761 http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsos.150630 Text en http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ © 2016 The Authors. Published by the Royal Society under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/, which permits unrestricted use, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Biology (Whole Organism)
Sakai, Shoko
Metelmann, Soeren
Toquenaga, Yukihiko
Telschow, Arndt
Geographical variation in the heterogeneity of mutualistic networks
title Geographical variation in the heterogeneity of mutualistic networks
title_full Geographical variation in the heterogeneity of mutualistic networks
title_fullStr Geographical variation in the heterogeneity of mutualistic networks
title_full_unstemmed Geographical variation in the heterogeneity of mutualistic networks
title_short Geographical variation in the heterogeneity of mutualistic networks
title_sort geographical variation in the heterogeneity of mutualistic networks
topic Biology (Whole Organism)
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4929896/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27429761
http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsos.150630
work_keys_str_mv AT sakaishoko geographicalvariationintheheterogeneityofmutualisticnetworks
AT metelmannsoeren geographicalvariationintheheterogeneityofmutualisticnetworks
AT toquenagayukihiko geographicalvariationintheheterogeneityofmutualisticnetworks
AT telschowarndt geographicalvariationintheheterogeneityofmutualisticnetworks