Cargando…
Multiple Citation Indicators and Their Composite across Scientific Disciplines
Many fields face an increasing prevalence of multi-authorship, and this poses challenges in assessing citation metrics. Here, we explore multiple citation indicators that address total impact (number of citations, Hirsch H index [H]), co-authorship adjustment (Schreiber Hm index [Hm]), and author or...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4930269/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27367269 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1002501 |
_version_ | 1782440726583312384 |
---|---|
author | Ioannidis, John P.A. Klavans, Richard Boyack, Kevin W. |
author_facet | Ioannidis, John P.A. Klavans, Richard Boyack, Kevin W. |
author_sort | Ioannidis, John P.A. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Many fields face an increasing prevalence of multi-authorship, and this poses challenges in assessing citation metrics. Here, we explore multiple citation indicators that address total impact (number of citations, Hirsch H index [H]), co-authorship adjustment (Schreiber Hm index [Hm]), and author order (total citations to papers as single; single or first; or single, first, or last author). We demonstrate the correlation patterns between these indicators across 84,116 scientists (those among the top 30,000 for impact in a single year [2013] in at least one of these indicators) and separately across 12 scientific fields. Correlation patterns vary across these 12 fields. In physics, total citations are highly negatively correlated with indicators of co-authorship adjustment and of author order, while in other sciences the negative correlation is seen only for total citation impact and citations to papers as single author. We propose a composite score that sums standardized values of these six log-transformed indicators. Of the 1,000 top-ranked scientists with the composite score, only 322 are in the top 1,000 based on total citations. Many Nobel laureates and other extremely influential scientists rank among the top-1,000 with the composite indicator, but would rank much lower based on total citations. Conversely, many of the top 1,000 authors on total citations have had no single/first/last-authored cited paper. More Nobel laureates of 2011–2015 are among the top authors when authors are ranked by the composite score than by total citations, H index, or Hm index; 40/47 of these laureates are among the top 30,000 by at least one of the six indicators. We also explore the sensitivity of indicators to self-citation and alphabetic ordering of authors in papers across different scientific fields. Multiple indicators and their composite may give a more comprehensive picture of impact, although no citation indicator, single or composite, can be expected to select all the best scientists. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4930269 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-49302692016-07-18 Multiple Citation Indicators and Their Composite across Scientific Disciplines Ioannidis, John P.A. Klavans, Richard Boyack, Kevin W. PLoS Biol Meta-Research Article Many fields face an increasing prevalence of multi-authorship, and this poses challenges in assessing citation metrics. Here, we explore multiple citation indicators that address total impact (number of citations, Hirsch H index [H]), co-authorship adjustment (Schreiber Hm index [Hm]), and author order (total citations to papers as single; single or first; or single, first, or last author). We demonstrate the correlation patterns between these indicators across 84,116 scientists (those among the top 30,000 for impact in a single year [2013] in at least one of these indicators) and separately across 12 scientific fields. Correlation patterns vary across these 12 fields. In physics, total citations are highly negatively correlated with indicators of co-authorship adjustment and of author order, while in other sciences the negative correlation is seen only for total citation impact and citations to papers as single author. We propose a composite score that sums standardized values of these six log-transformed indicators. Of the 1,000 top-ranked scientists with the composite score, only 322 are in the top 1,000 based on total citations. Many Nobel laureates and other extremely influential scientists rank among the top-1,000 with the composite indicator, but would rank much lower based on total citations. Conversely, many of the top 1,000 authors on total citations have had no single/first/last-authored cited paper. More Nobel laureates of 2011–2015 are among the top authors when authors are ranked by the composite score than by total citations, H index, or Hm index; 40/47 of these laureates are among the top 30,000 by at least one of the six indicators. We also explore the sensitivity of indicators to self-citation and alphabetic ordering of authors in papers across different scientific fields. Multiple indicators and their composite may give a more comprehensive picture of impact, although no citation indicator, single or composite, can be expected to select all the best scientists. Public Library of Science 2016-07-01 /pmc/articles/PMC4930269/ /pubmed/27367269 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1002501 Text en © 2016 Ioannidis et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Meta-Research Article Ioannidis, John P.A. Klavans, Richard Boyack, Kevin W. Multiple Citation Indicators and Their Composite across Scientific Disciplines |
title | Multiple Citation Indicators and Their Composite across Scientific Disciplines |
title_full | Multiple Citation Indicators and Their Composite across Scientific Disciplines |
title_fullStr | Multiple Citation Indicators and Their Composite across Scientific Disciplines |
title_full_unstemmed | Multiple Citation Indicators and Their Composite across Scientific Disciplines |
title_short | Multiple Citation Indicators and Their Composite across Scientific Disciplines |
title_sort | multiple citation indicators and their composite across scientific disciplines |
topic | Meta-Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4930269/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27367269 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1002501 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ioannidisjohnpa multiplecitationindicatorsandtheircompositeacrossscientificdisciplines AT klavansrichard multiplecitationindicatorsandtheircompositeacrossscientificdisciplines AT boyackkevinw multiplecitationindicatorsandtheircompositeacrossscientificdisciplines |