Cargando…

Accuracy of currently available neonatal respiratory function monitors for neonatal resuscitation

This study aimed to test the accuracy in volume measurements of three available respiratory function monitors (RFMs) for neonatal resuscitation and the effect of changing gas conditions. The Florian, New Life Box Neo-RSD (NLB Neo-RSD) and NICO RFM were tested on accuracy with volumes of 10 and 20 mL...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Verbeek, Charlotte, van Zanten, Henriëtte A., van Vonderen, Jeroen J., Kitchen, Marcus J, Hooper, Stuart B., te Pas, Arjan B.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4930469/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27279013
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00431-016-2739-1
_version_ 1782440745958899712
author Verbeek, Charlotte
van Zanten, Henriëtte A.
van Vonderen, Jeroen J.
Kitchen, Marcus J
Hooper, Stuart B.
te Pas, Arjan B.
author_facet Verbeek, Charlotte
van Zanten, Henriëtte A.
van Vonderen, Jeroen J.
Kitchen, Marcus J
Hooper, Stuart B.
te Pas, Arjan B.
author_sort Verbeek, Charlotte
collection PubMed
description This study aimed to test the accuracy in volume measurements of three available respiratory function monitors (RFMs) for neonatal resuscitation and the effect of changing gas conditions. The Florian, New Life Box Neo-RSD (NLB Neo-RSD) and NICO RFM were tested on accuracy with volumes of 10 and 20 mL and on changes in volume measurements under changing gas conditions (oxygen level 21–100 % and from cold dry air (24 ± 2 °C) to heated humidified air (37 °C). Volume differences >10 % were considered clinically relevant. We found that the mean (SD) volume difference was clinically acceptable for all devices (10, 20 mL): Florian (+8.4 (1.2)%, +8.4 (0.5)%); NLB Neo-RSD (+5.8 (1.1)%, +4.3 (1.4)%); and NICO (−8.2 (0.9)%, −8.7 (0.8)%). Changing from cold dry to heated humidified air increased the volume difference using the Florian (cold dry air, heated humidified air (+5.2 (1.2)%, +12.2 (0.9)%) but not NLB Neo-RSD (+2.0(1.6)%, +3.4(2.8)%) and NICO (−2.3 % (0.8), +0.1 (0.6)%). Similarly, when using heated humidified air, increasing oxygen enlarged increased the volume difference using the Florian (oxygen 21 %, 100 %: +12.2(1.0)%, +19.8(1.1)%), but not NLB Neo-RSD (+0.2(1.9)%, +1.1(2.8)%) and NICO (−5.6(0.9)%, −3.7(0.9)%). Clinically relevant changes occurred when changing both gas conditions (Florian +25.7(1.7)%; NLB Neo-RSD +3.8(2.4)%; NICO −5.7(1.4)%). Conclusion: The available RFMs demonstrated clinically acceptable deviations in volume measurements, except for the Florian when changing gas conditions.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4930469
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-49304692016-07-13 Accuracy of currently available neonatal respiratory function monitors for neonatal resuscitation Verbeek, Charlotte van Zanten, Henriëtte A. van Vonderen, Jeroen J. Kitchen, Marcus J Hooper, Stuart B. te Pas, Arjan B. Eur J Pediatr Original Article This study aimed to test the accuracy in volume measurements of three available respiratory function monitors (RFMs) for neonatal resuscitation and the effect of changing gas conditions. The Florian, New Life Box Neo-RSD (NLB Neo-RSD) and NICO RFM were tested on accuracy with volumes of 10 and 20 mL and on changes in volume measurements under changing gas conditions (oxygen level 21–100 % and from cold dry air (24 ± 2 °C) to heated humidified air (37 °C). Volume differences >10 % were considered clinically relevant. We found that the mean (SD) volume difference was clinically acceptable for all devices (10, 20 mL): Florian (+8.4 (1.2)%, +8.4 (0.5)%); NLB Neo-RSD (+5.8 (1.1)%, +4.3 (1.4)%); and NICO (−8.2 (0.9)%, −8.7 (0.8)%). Changing from cold dry to heated humidified air increased the volume difference using the Florian (cold dry air, heated humidified air (+5.2 (1.2)%, +12.2 (0.9)%) but not NLB Neo-RSD (+2.0(1.6)%, +3.4(2.8)%) and NICO (−2.3 % (0.8), +0.1 (0.6)%). Similarly, when using heated humidified air, increasing oxygen enlarged increased the volume difference using the Florian (oxygen 21 %, 100 %: +12.2(1.0)%, +19.8(1.1)%), but not NLB Neo-RSD (+0.2(1.9)%, +1.1(2.8)%) and NICO (−5.6(0.9)%, −3.7(0.9)%). Clinically relevant changes occurred when changing both gas conditions (Florian +25.7(1.7)%; NLB Neo-RSD +3.8(2.4)%; NICO −5.7(1.4)%). Conclusion: The available RFMs demonstrated clinically acceptable deviations in volume measurements, except for the Florian when changing gas conditions. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2016-06-08 2016 /pmc/articles/PMC4930469/ /pubmed/27279013 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00431-016-2739-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2016 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Original Article
Verbeek, Charlotte
van Zanten, Henriëtte A.
van Vonderen, Jeroen J.
Kitchen, Marcus J
Hooper, Stuart B.
te Pas, Arjan B.
Accuracy of currently available neonatal respiratory function monitors for neonatal resuscitation
title Accuracy of currently available neonatal respiratory function monitors for neonatal resuscitation
title_full Accuracy of currently available neonatal respiratory function monitors for neonatal resuscitation
title_fullStr Accuracy of currently available neonatal respiratory function monitors for neonatal resuscitation
title_full_unstemmed Accuracy of currently available neonatal respiratory function monitors for neonatal resuscitation
title_short Accuracy of currently available neonatal respiratory function monitors for neonatal resuscitation
title_sort accuracy of currently available neonatal respiratory function monitors for neonatal resuscitation
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4930469/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27279013
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00431-016-2739-1
work_keys_str_mv AT verbeekcharlotte accuracyofcurrentlyavailableneonatalrespiratoryfunctionmonitorsforneonatalresuscitation
AT vanzantenhenriettea accuracyofcurrentlyavailableneonatalrespiratoryfunctionmonitorsforneonatalresuscitation
AT vanvonderenjeroenj accuracyofcurrentlyavailableneonatalrespiratoryfunctionmonitorsforneonatalresuscitation
AT kitchenmarcusj accuracyofcurrentlyavailableneonatalrespiratoryfunctionmonitorsforneonatalresuscitation
AT hooperstuartb accuracyofcurrentlyavailableneonatalrespiratoryfunctionmonitorsforneonatalresuscitation
AT tepasarjanb accuracyofcurrentlyavailableneonatalrespiratoryfunctionmonitorsforneonatalresuscitation