Cargando…

Quality attributes of sweet potato flour as influenced by variety, pretreatment and drying method

The effect of pretreatment methods (soaking in water, potassium metabisulphite solution, and blanching) and drying methods (sun and oven) on some quality attributes of flour from ten varieties of sweet potato roots were investigated. The quality attributes determined were chemical composition and fu...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Olatunde, Ganiyat O., Henshaw, Folake O., Idowu, Michael A., Tomlins, Keith
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4930505/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27386111
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/fsn3.325
_version_ 1782440752872161280
author Olatunde, Ganiyat O.
Henshaw, Folake O.
Idowu, Michael A.
Tomlins, Keith
author_facet Olatunde, Ganiyat O.
Henshaw, Folake O.
Idowu, Michael A.
Tomlins, Keith
author_sort Olatunde, Ganiyat O.
collection PubMed
description The effect of pretreatment methods (soaking in water, potassium metabisulphite solution, and blanching) and drying methods (sun and oven) on some quality attributes of flour from ten varieties of sweet potato roots were investigated. The quality attributes determined were chemical composition and functional properties. Data obtained were subjected to descriptive statistics, multivariate analysis of variance, and Pearson's correlation. The range of values for properties of sweet potato flour were: moisture (8.06–12.86 ± 1.13%), starch (55.76–83.65 ± 6.82%), amylose (10.06–21.26 ± 3.92%), total sugar (22.39–125.46 ± 24.68 μg/mg), water absorption capacity (140–280 ± 26), water solubility (6.89–26.18 ± 3.80), swelling power (1.66–5.00 ± 0.50), peak viscosity (24.50–260.92 ± 52.61 RVU), trough (7.08–145.83 ± 34.48 RVU), breakdown viscosity (11.00–125.33 RVU), final viscosity (10.21–225.50 ± 60.55 RVU), setback viscosity (3.04–92.21 RVU), peak time (6.07–9.06 min) and pasting temperature (69.8–81.3°C). Variety had a significant (P < 0.001) effect on all the attributes of sweet potato flour. Pretreatment did not significantly (P > 0.05) affect moisture, fat and lightness (L*). Drying method did not significantly (P > 0.05) affect fiber and L*. The interactive effect of variety, pretreatment and drying method had a significant (P < 0.001) effect on all the attributes except fat and fiber. Total sugar correlated significantly (P < 0.01) with water solubility (r = 0.88) of the flour samples. Variety was a dominant factor influencing attributes of sweet potato flour and so should be targeted at specific end uses.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4930505
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-49305052016-07-06 Quality attributes of sweet potato flour as influenced by variety, pretreatment and drying method Olatunde, Ganiyat O. Henshaw, Folake O. Idowu, Michael A. Tomlins, Keith Food Sci Nutr Original Research The effect of pretreatment methods (soaking in water, potassium metabisulphite solution, and blanching) and drying methods (sun and oven) on some quality attributes of flour from ten varieties of sweet potato roots were investigated. The quality attributes determined were chemical composition and functional properties. Data obtained were subjected to descriptive statistics, multivariate analysis of variance, and Pearson's correlation. The range of values for properties of sweet potato flour were: moisture (8.06–12.86 ± 1.13%), starch (55.76–83.65 ± 6.82%), amylose (10.06–21.26 ± 3.92%), total sugar (22.39–125.46 ± 24.68 μg/mg), water absorption capacity (140–280 ± 26), water solubility (6.89–26.18 ± 3.80), swelling power (1.66–5.00 ± 0.50), peak viscosity (24.50–260.92 ± 52.61 RVU), trough (7.08–145.83 ± 34.48 RVU), breakdown viscosity (11.00–125.33 RVU), final viscosity (10.21–225.50 ± 60.55 RVU), setback viscosity (3.04–92.21 RVU), peak time (6.07–9.06 min) and pasting temperature (69.8–81.3°C). Variety had a significant (P < 0.001) effect on all the attributes of sweet potato flour. Pretreatment did not significantly (P > 0.05) affect moisture, fat and lightness (L*). Drying method did not significantly (P > 0.05) affect fiber and L*. The interactive effect of variety, pretreatment and drying method had a significant (P < 0.001) effect on all the attributes except fat and fiber. Total sugar correlated significantly (P < 0.01) with water solubility (r = 0.88) of the flour samples. Variety was a dominant factor influencing attributes of sweet potato flour and so should be targeted at specific end uses. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2015-12-23 /pmc/articles/PMC4930505/ /pubmed/27386111 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/fsn3.325 Text en © 2015 The Authors. Food Science & Nutrition published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Research
Olatunde, Ganiyat O.
Henshaw, Folake O.
Idowu, Michael A.
Tomlins, Keith
Quality attributes of sweet potato flour as influenced by variety, pretreatment and drying method
title Quality attributes of sweet potato flour as influenced by variety, pretreatment and drying method
title_full Quality attributes of sweet potato flour as influenced by variety, pretreatment and drying method
title_fullStr Quality attributes of sweet potato flour as influenced by variety, pretreatment and drying method
title_full_unstemmed Quality attributes of sweet potato flour as influenced by variety, pretreatment and drying method
title_short Quality attributes of sweet potato flour as influenced by variety, pretreatment and drying method
title_sort quality attributes of sweet potato flour as influenced by variety, pretreatment and drying method
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4930505/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27386111
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/fsn3.325
work_keys_str_mv AT olatundeganiyato qualityattributesofsweetpotatoflourasinfluencedbyvarietypretreatmentanddryingmethod
AT henshawfolakeo qualityattributesofsweetpotatoflourasinfluencedbyvarietypretreatmentanddryingmethod
AT idowumichaela qualityattributesofsweetpotatoflourasinfluencedbyvarietypretreatmentanddryingmethod
AT tomlinskeith qualityattributesofsweetpotatoflourasinfluencedbyvarietypretreatmentanddryingmethod