Cargando…
A simple classification of cranial–nasal–orbital communicating tumors that facilitate choice of surgical approaches: analysis of a series of 32 cases
Cranial–nasal–orbital communicating tumors involving the anterior and middle skull base are among the most challenging to treat surgically, with high rates of incomplete resection and surgical complications. Currently, there is no recognized classification of tumors with regard to the choice of surg...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4930795/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27016919 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00405-016-4003-8 |
_version_ | 1782440785322442752 |
---|---|
author | Deng, Yue-fei Lei, Bing-xi Zheng, Mei-guang Zheng, Yi-qing Chen, Wei-liang Lan, Yu-qing |
author_facet | Deng, Yue-fei Lei, Bing-xi Zheng, Mei-guang Zheng, Yi-qing Chen, Wei-liang Lan, Yu-qing |
author_sort | Deng, Yue-fei |
collection | PubMed |
description | Cranial–nasal–orbital communicating tumors involving the anterior and middle skull base are among the most challenging to treat surgically, with high rates of incomplete resection and surgical complications. Currently, there is no recognized classification of tumors with regard to the choice of surgical approaches. From January 2004 to January 2014, we classified 32 cranial–nasal–orbital communicating tumors treated in our center into three types according to the tumor body location, scope of extension and direction of invasion: lateral (type I), central (type II) and extensive (type III). This classification considerably facilitated the choice of surgical routes and significantly influenced the surgical time and amount of hemorrhage during operation. In addition, we emphasized the use of transnasal endoscopy for large and extensive tumors, individualized treatment strategies drafted by a group of multidisciplinary collaborators, and careful reconstruction of the skull base defects. Our treatment strategies achieved good surgical outcomes, with a high ratio of total resection (87.5 %, 28/32, including 16 cases of benign tumors and 12 cases of malignant tumors) and a low percentage of surgical complications (18.8 %, 6/32). Original symptoms were alleviated in 29 patients. The average KPS score improved from 81.25 % preoperatively to 91.25 % at 3 months after surgery. No serious perioperative complications occurred. During the follow-up of 3 years on average, four patients with malignant tumors died, including three who had subtotal resections. The 3-year survival rate of patients with malignant tumors was 78.6 %, and the overall 3-year survival rate was 87.5 %. Our data indicate that the simple classification method has practical significance in guiding the choice of surgical approaches for cranial–nasal–orbital communicating tumors and may be extended to other types of skull base tumors. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s00405-016-4003-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4930795 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-49307952016-07-16 A simple classification of cranial–nasal–orbital communicating tumors that facilitate choice of surgical approaches: analysis of a series of 32 cases Deng, Yue-fei Lei, Bing-xi Zheng, Mei-guang Zheng, Yi-qing Chen, Wei-liang Lan, Yu-qing Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol Miscellaneous Cranial–nasal–orbital communicating tumors involving the anterior and middle skull base are among the most challenging to treat surgically, with high rates of incomplete resection and surgical complications. Currently, there is no recognized classification of tumors with regard to the choice of surgical approaches. From January 2004 to January 2014, we classified 32 cranial–nasal–orbital communicating tumors treated in our center into three types according to the tumor body location, scope of extension and direction of invasion: lateral (type I), central (type II) and extensive (type III). This classification considerably facilitated the choice of surgical routes and significantly influenced the surgical time and amount of hemorrhage during operation. In addition, we emphasized the use of transnasal endoscopy for large and extensive tumors, individualized treatment strategies drafted by a group of multidisciplinary collaborators, and careful reconstruction of the skull base defects. Our treatment strategies achieved good surgical outcomes, with a high ratio of total resection (87.5 %, 28/32, including 16 cases of benign tumors and 12 cases of malignant tumors) and a low percentage of surgical complications (18.8 %, 6/32). Original symptoms were alleviated in 29 patients. The average KPS score improved from 81.25 % preoperatively to 91.25 % at 3 months after surgery. No serious perioperative complications occurred. During the follow-up of 3 years on average, four patients with malignant tumors died, including three who had subtotal resections. The 3-year survival rate of patients with malignant tumors was 78.6 %, and the overall 3-year survival rate was 87.5 %. Our data indicate that the simple classification method has practical significance in guiding the choice of surgical approaches for cranial–nasal–orbital communicating tumors and may be extended to other types of skull base tumors. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s00405-016-4003-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2016-03-26 2016 /pmc/articles/PMC4930795/ /pubmed/27016919 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00405-016-4003-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. |
spellingShingle | Miscellaneous Deng, Yue-fei Lei, Bing-xi Zheng, Mei-guang Zheng, Yi-qing Chen, Wei-liang Lan, Yu-qing A simple classification of cranial–nasal–orbital communicating tumors that facilitate choice of surgical approaches: analysis of a series of 32 cases |
title | A simple classification of cranial–nasal–orbital communicating tumors that facilitate choice of surgical approaches: analysis of a series of 32 cases |
title_full | A simple classification of cranial–nasal–orbital communicating tumors that facilitate choice of surgical approaches: analysis of a series of 32 cases |
title_fullStr | A simple classification of cranial–nasal–orbital communicating tumors that facilitate choice of surgical approaches: analysis of a series of 32 cases |
title_full_unstemmed | A simple classification of cranial–nasal–orbital communicating tumors that facilitate choice of surgical approaches: analysis of a series of 32 cases |
title_short | A simple classification of cranial–nasal–orbital communicating tumors that facilitate choice of surgical approaches: analysis of a series of 32 cases |
title_sort | simple classification of cranial–nasal–orbital communicating tumors that facilitate choice of surgical approaches: analysis of a series of 32 cases |
topic | Miscellaneous |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4930795/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27016919 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00405-016-4003-8 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT dengyuefei asimpleclassificationofcranialnasalorbitalcommunicatingtumorsthatfacilitatechoiceofsurgicalapproachesanalysisofaseriesof32cases AT leibingxi asimpleclassificationofcranialnasalorbitalcommunicatingtumorsthatfacilitatechoiceofsurgicalapproachesanalysisofaseriesof32cases AT zhengmeiguang asimpleclassificationofcranialnasalorbitalcommunicatingtumorsthatfacilitatechoiceofsurgicalapproachesanalysisofaseriesof32cases AT zhengyiqing asimpleclassificationofcranialnasalorbitalcommunicatingtumorsthatfacilitatechoiceofsurgicalapproachesanalysisofaseriesof32cases AT chenweiliang asimpleclassificationofcranialnasalorbitalcommunicatingtumorsthatfacilitatechoiceofsurgicalapproachesanalysisofaseriesof32cases AT lanyuqing asimpleclassificationofcranialnasalorbitalcommunicatingtumorsthatfacilitatechoiceofsurgicalapproachesanalysisofaseriesof32cases AT dengyuefei simpleclassificationofcranialnasalorbitalcommunicatingtumorsthatfacilitatechoiceofsurgicalapproachesanalysisofaseriesof32cases AT leibingxi simpleclassificationofcranialnasalorbitalcommunicatingtumorsthatfacilitatechoiceofsurgicalapproachesanalysisofaseriesof32cases AT zhengmeiguang simpleclassificationofcranialnasalorbitalcommunicatingtumorsthatfacilitatechoiceofsurgicalapproachesanalysisofaseriesof32cases AT zhengyiqing simpleclassificationofcranialnasalorbitalcommunicatingtumorsthatfacilitatechoiceofsurgicalapproachesanalysisofaseriesof32cases AT chenweiliang simpleclassificationofcranialnasalorbitalcommunicatingtumorsthatfacilitatechoiceofsurgicalapproachesanalysisofaseriesof32cases AT lanyuqing simpleclassificationofcranialnasalorbitalcommunicatingtumorsthatfacilitatechoiceofsurgicalapproachesanalysisofaseriesof32cases |