Cargando…

A simple classification of cranial–nasal–orbital communicating tumors that facilitate choice of surgical approaches: analysis of a series of 32 cases

Cranial–nasal–orbital communicating tumors involving the anterior and middle skull base are among the most challenging to treat surgically, with high rates of incomplete resection and surgical complications. Currently, there is no recognized classification of tumors with regard to the choice of surg...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Deng, Yue-fei, Lei, Bing-xi, Zheng, Mei-guang, Zheng, Yi-qing, Chen, Wei-liang, Lan, Yu-qing
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4930795/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27016919
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00405-016-4003-8
_version_ 1782440785322442752
author Deng, Yue-fei
Lei, Bing-xi
Zheng, Mei-guang
Zheng, Yi-qing
Chen, Wei-liang
Lan, Yu-qing
author_facet Deng, Yue-fei
Lei, Bing-xi
Zheng, Mei-guang
Zheng, Yi-qing
Chen, Wei-liang
Lan, Yu-qing
author_sort Deng, Yue-fei
collection PubMed
description Cranial–nasal–orbital communicating tumors involving the anterior and middle skull base are among the most challenging to treat surgically, with high rates of incomplete resection and surgical complications. Currently, there is no recognized classification of tumors with regard to the choice of surgical approaches. From January 2004 to January 2014, we classified 32 cranial–nasal–orbital communicating tumors treated in our center into three types according to the tumor body location, scope of extension and direction of invasion: lateral (type I), central (type II) and extensive (type III). This classification considerably facilitated the choice of surgical routes and significantly influenced the surgical time and amount of hemorrhage during operation. In addition, we emphasized the use of transnasal endoscopy for large and extensive tumors, individualized treatment strategies drafted by a group of multidisciplinary collaborators, and careful reconstruction of the skull base defects. Our treatment strategies achieved good surgical outcomes, with a high ratio of total resection (87.5 %, 28/32, including 16 cases of benign tumors and 12 cases of malignant tumors) and a low percentage of surgical complications (18.8 %, 6/32). Original symptoms were alleviated in 29 patients. The average KPS score improved from 81.25 % preoperatively to 91.25 % at 3 months after surgery. No serious perioperative complications occurred. During the follow-up of 3 years on average, four patients with malignant tumors died, including three who had subtotal resections. The 3-year survival rate of patients with malignant tumors was 78.6 %, and the overall 3-year survival rate was 87.5 %. Our data indicate that the simple classification method has practical significance in guiding the choice of surgical approaches for cranial–nasal–orbital communicating tumors and may be extended to other types of skull base tumors. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s00405-016-4003-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4930795
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-49307952016-07-16 A simple classification of cranial–nasal–orbital communicating tumors that facilitate choice of surgical approaches: analysis of a series of 32 cases Deng, Yue-fei Lei, Bing-xi Zheng, Mei-guang Zheng, Yi-qing Chen, Wei-liang Lan, Yu-qing Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol Miscellaneous Cranial–nasal–orbital communicating tumors involving the anterior and middle skull base are among the most challenging to treat surgically, with high rates of incomplete resection and surgical complications. Currently, there is no recognized classification of tumors with regard to the choice of surgical approaches. From January 2004 to January 2014, we classified 32 cranial–nasal–orbital communicating tumors treated in our center into three types according to the tumor body location, scope of extension and direction of invasion: lateral (type I), central (type II) and extensive (type III). This classification considerably facilitated the choice of surgical routes and significantly influenced the surgical time and amount of hemorrhage during operation. In addition, we emphasized the use of transnasal endoscopy for large and extensive tumors, individualized treatment strategies drafted by a group of multidisciplinary collaborators, and careful reconstruction of the skull base defects. Our treatment strategies achieved good surgical outcomes, with a high ratio of total resection (87.5 %, 28/32, including 16 cases of benign tumors and 12 cases of malignant tumors) and a low percentage of surgical complications (18.8 %, 6/32). Original symptoms were alleviated in 29 patients. The average KPS score improved from 81.25 % preoperatively to 91.25 % at 3 months after surgery. No serious perioperative complications occurred. During the follow-up of 3 years on average, four patients with malignant tumors died, including three who had subtotal resections. The 3-year survival rate of patients with malignant tumors was 78.6 %, and the overall 3-year survival rate was 87.5 %. Our data indicate that the simple classification method has practical significance in guiding the choice of surgical approaches for cranial–nasal–orbital communicating tumors and may be extended to other types of skull base tumors. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s00405-016-4003-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2016-03-26 2016 /pmc/articles/PMC4930795/ /pubmed/27016919 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00405-016-4003-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Miscellaneous
Deng, Yue-fei
Lei, Bing-xi
Zheng, Mei-guang
Zheng, Yi-qing
Chen, Wei-liang
Lan, Yu-qing
A simple classification of cranial–nasal–orbital communicating tumors that facilitate choice of surgical approaches: analysis of a series of 32 cases
title A simple classification of cranial–nasal–orbital communicating tumors that facilitate choice of surgical approaches: analysis of a series of 32 cases
title_full A simple classification of cranial–nasal–orbital communicating tumors that facilitate choice of surgical approaches: analysis of a series of 32 cases
title_fullStr A simple classification of cranial–nasal–orbital communicating tumors that facilitate choice of surgical approaches: analysis of a series of 32 cases
title_full_unstemmed A simple classification of cranial–nasal–orbital communicating tumors that facilitate choice of surgical approaches: analysis of a series of 32 cases
title_short A simple classification of cranial–nasal–orbital communicating tumors that facilitate choice of surgical approaches: analysis of a series of 32 cases
title_sort simple classification of cranial–nasal–orbital communicating tumors that facilitate choice of surgical approaches: analysis of a series of 32 cases
topic Miscellaneous
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4930795/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27016919
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00405-016-4003-8
work_keys_str_mv AT dengyuefei asimpleclassificationofcranialnasalorbitalcommunicatingtumorsthatfacilitatechoiceofsurgicalapproachesanalysisofaseriesof32cases
AT leibingxi asimpleclassificationofcranialnasalorbitalcommunicatingtumorsthatfacilitatechoiceofsurgicalapproachesanalysisofaseriesof32cases
AT zhengmeiguang asimpleclassificationofcranialnasalorbitalcommunicatingtumorsthatfacilitatechoiceofsurgicalapproachesanalysisofaseriesof32cases
AT zhengyiqing asimpleclassificationofcranialnasalorbitalcommunicatingtumorsthatfacilitatechoiceofsurgicalapproachesanalysisofaseriesof32cases
AT chenweiliang asimpleclassificationofcranialnasalorbitalcommunicatingtumorsthatfacilitatechoiceofsurgicalapproachesanalysisofaseriesof32cases
AT lanyuqing asimpleclassificationofcranialnasalorbitalcommunicatingtumorsthatfacilitatechoiceofsurgicalapproachesanalysisofaseriesof32cases
AT dengyuefei simpleclassificationofcranialnasalorbitalcommunicatingtumorsthatfacilitatechoiceofsurgicalapproachesanalysisofaseriesof32cases
AT leibingxi simpleclassificationofcranialnasalorbitalcommunicatingtumorsthatfacilitatechoiceofsurgicalapproachesanalysisofaseriesof32cases
AT zhengmeiguang simpleclassificationofcranialnasalorbitalcommunicatingtumorsthatfacilitatechoiceofsurgicalapproachesanalysisofaseriesof32cases
AT zhengyiqing simpleclassificationofcranialnasalorbitalcommunicatingtumorsthatfacilitatechoiceofsurgicalapproachesanalysisofaseriesof32cases
AT chenweiliang simpleclassificationofcranialnasalorbitalcommunicatingtumorsthatfacilitatechoiceofsurgicalapproachesanalysisofaseriesof32cases
AT lanyuqing simpleclassificationofcranialnasalorbitalcommunicatingtumorsthatfacilitatechoiceofsurgicalapproachesanalysisofaseriesof32cases