Cargando…

Consumer access to clozapine in Australia: how does this compare to New Zealand and the United Kingdom?

BACKGROUND: Clozapine is an antipsychotic medication used in treatment resistant schizophrenia. However, clozapine is associated with a significant adverse effect profile and extensive monitoring is required to optimise consumer safety. Traditionally, clozapine can only be prescribed by a psychiatri...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Knowles, Sally-Anne, Mcmillan, Sara S., Wheeler, Amanda J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Centro de Investigaciones y Publicaciones Farmaceuticas 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4930860/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27382426
http://dx.doi.org/10.18549/PharmPract.2016.02.722
_version_ 1782440798560714752
author Knowles, Sally-Anne
Mcmillan, Sara S.
Wheeler, Amanda J.
author_facet Knowles, Sally-Anne
Mcmillan, Sara S.
Wheeler, Amanda J.
author_sort Knowles, Sally-Anne
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Clozapine is an antipsychotic medication used in treatment resistant schizophrenia. However, clozapine is associated with a significant adverse effect profile and extensive monitoring is required to optimise consumer safety. Traditionally, clozapine can only be prescribed by a psychiatrist and dispensed at a hospital or hospital affiliated pharmacy in Australia. These restrictions could result in significant treatment burden for consumers taking clozapine. OBJECTIVE: To identify (1) the different models of supply that exist for people living in the community taking clozapine in Australia and compare to those in New Zealand and the United Kingdom, and (2) explore how these supply models may impact on consumer burden from the perspective of professionals involved in the supply of clozapine. METHOD: Key informants were interviewed (n=8) from Australia, New Zealand and the United Kingdom regarding how consumers, who lived in the community, accessed clozapine. Data were analysed and led to the development of four clozapine supply models. These four models were further validated by an online survey of a wider sample (n=30). Data were analysed thematically and via simple descriptive statistics. RESULTS: Clozapine supply varied depending on location. A secondary care model was utilised in the United Kingdom compared to a community based (primary care) model in New Zealand; Australia utilised a mixture of both secondary and primary care. A key theme from all study participants was that community pharmacy should be utilised to dispense clozapine to consumers living in the community, provided adequate training and safeguards are in place. It was noted that the utilisation of community pharmacies could improve access and flexibility, thereby reducing treatment burden for these consumers. CONCLUSION: There are predominately two models for supply of clozapine to consumers living in the community in Australia, New Zealand and the United Kingdom. One model utilises secondary care facilities and the other community services. Community pharmacy is ideally placed to increase access to clozapine for consumers living in the community, provided appropriate training and support is given to pharmacists providing this professional service.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4930860
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Centro de Investigaciones y Publicaciones Farmaceuticas
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-49308602016-07-05 Consumer access to clozapine in Australia: how does this compare to New Zealand and the United Kingdom? Knowles, Sally-Anne Mcmillan, Sara S. Wheeler, Amanda J. Pharm Pract (Granada) Original Research BACKGROUND: Clozapine is an antipsychotic medication used in treatment resistant schizophrenia. However, clozapine is associated with a significant adverse effect profile and extensive monitoring is required to optimise consumer safety. Traditionally, clozapine can only be prescribed by a psychiatrist and dispensed at a hospital or hospital affiliated pharmacy in Australia. These restrictions could result in significant treatment burden for consumers taking clozapine. OBJECTIVE: To identify (1) the different models of supply that exist for people living in the community taking clozapine in Australia and compare to those in New Zealand and the United Kingdom, and (2) explore how these supply models may impact on consumer burden from the perspective of professionals involved in the supply of clozapine. METHOD: Key informants were interviewed (n=8) from Australia, New Zealand and the United Kingdom regarding how consumers, who lived in the community, accessed clozapine. Data were analysed and led to the development of four clozapine supply models. These four models were further validated by an online survey of a wider sample (n=30). Data were analysed thematically and via simple descriptive statistics. RESULTS: Clozapine supply varied depending on location. A secondary care model was utilised in the United Kingdom compared to a community based (primary care) model in New Zealand; Australia utilised a mixture of both secondary and primary care. A key theme from all study participants was that community pharmacy should be utilised to dispense clozapine to consumers living in the community, provided adequate training and safeguards are in place. It was noted that the utilisation of community pharmacies could improve access and flexibility, thereby reducing treatment burden for these consumers. CONCLUSION: There are predominately two models for supply of clozapine to consumers living in the community in Australia, New Zealand and the United Kingdom. One model utilises secondary care facilities and the other community services. Community pharmacy is ideally placed to increase access to clozapine for consumers living in the community, provided appropriate training and support is given to pharmacists providing this professional service. Centro de Investigaciones y Publicaciones Farmaceuticas 2016 2016-06-15 /pmc/articles/PMC4930860/ /pubmed/27382426 http://dx.doi.org/10.18549/PharmPract.2016.02.722 Text en Copyright: © Pharmacy Practice http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Research
Knowles, Sally-Anne
Mcmillan, Sara S.
Wheeler, Amanda J.
Consumer access to clozapine in Australia: how does this compare to New Zealand and the United Kingdom?
title Consumer access to clozapine in Australia: how does this compare to New Zealand and the United Kingdom?
title_full Consumer access to clozapine in Australia: how does this compare to New Zealand and the United Kingdom?
title_fullStr Consumer access to clozapine in Australia: how does this compare to New Zealand and the United Kingdom?
title_full_unstemmed Consumer access to clozapine in Australia: how does this compare to New Zealand and the United Kingdom?
title_short Consumer access to clozapine in Australia: how does this compare to New Zealand and the United Kingdom?
title_sort consumer access to clozapine in australia: how does this compare to new zealand and the united kingdom?
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4930860/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27382426
http://dx.doi.org/10.18549/PharmPract.2016.02.722
work_keys_str_mv AT knowlessallyanne consumeraccesstoclozapineinaustraliahowdoesthiscomparetonewzealandandtheunitedkingdom
AT mcmillansaras consumeraccesstoclozapineinaustraliahowdoesthiscomparetonewzealandandtheunitedkingdom
AT wheeleramandaj consumeraccesstoclozapineinaustraliahowdoesthiscomparetonewzealandandtheunitedkingdom