Cargando…
Age-Related Differences in Lexical Access Relate to Speech Recognition in Noise
Vocabulary size has been suggested as a useful measure of “verbal abilities” that correlates with speech recognition scores. Knowing more words is linked to better speech recognition. How vocabulary knowledge translates to general speech recognition mechanisms, how these mechanisms relate to offline...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4930932/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27458400 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00990 |
_version_ | 1782440803575005184 |
---|---|
author | Carroll, Rebecca Warzybok, Anna Kollmeier, Birger Ruigendijk, Esther |
author_facet | Carroll, Rebecca Warzybok, Anna Kollmeier, Birger Ruigendijk, Esther |
author_sort | Carroll, Rebecca |
collection | PubMed |
description | Vocabulary size has been suggested as a useful measure of “verbal abilities” that correlates with speech recognition scores. Knowing more words is linked to better speech recognition. How vocabulary knowledge translates to general speech recognition mechanisms, how these mechanisms relate to offline speech recognition scores, and how they may be modulated by acoustical distortion or age, is less clear. Age-related differences in linguistic measures may predict age-related differences in speech recognition in noise performance. We hypothesized that speech recognition performance can be predicted by the efficiency of lexical access, which refers to the speed with which a given word can be searched and accessed relative to the size of the mental lexicon. We tested speech recognition in a clinical German sentence-in-noise test at two signal-to-noise ratios (SNRs), in 22 younger (18–35 years) and 22 older (60–78 years) listeners with normal hearing. We also assessed receptive vocabulary, lexical access time, verbal working memory, and hearing thresholds as measures of individual differences. Age group, SNR level, vocabulary size, and lexical access time were significant predictors of individual speech recognition scores, but working memory and hearing threshold were not. Interestingly, longer accessing times were correlated with better speech recognition scores. Hierarchical regression models for each subset of age group and SNR showed very similar patterns: the combination of vocabulary size and lexical access time contributed most to speech recognition performance; only for the younger group at the better SNR (yielding about 85% correct speech recognition) did vocabulary size alone predict performance. Our data suggest that successful speech recognition in noise is mainly modulated by the efficiency of lexical access. This suggests that older adults’ poorer performance in the speech recognition task may have arisen from reduced efficiency in lexical access; with an average vocabulary size similar to that of younger adults, they were still slower in lexical access. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4930932 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-49309322016-07-25 Age-Related Differences in Lexical Access Relate to Speech Recognition in Noise Carroll, Rebecca Warzybok, Anna Kollmeier, Birger Ruigendijk, Esther Front Psychol Psychology Vocabulary size has been suggested as a useful measure of “verbal abilities” that correlates with speech recognition scores. Knowing more words is linked to better speech recognition. How vocabulary knowledge translates to general speech recognition mechanisms, how these mechanisms relate to offline speech recognition scores, and how they may be modulated by acoustical distortion or age, is less clear. Age-related differences in linguistic measures may predict age-related differences in speech recognition in noise performance. We hypothesized that speech recognition performance can be predicted by the efficiency of lexical access, which refers to the speed with which a given word can be searched and accessed relative to the size of the mental lexicon. We tested speech recognition in a clinical German sentence-in-noise test at two signal-to-noise ratios (SNRs), in 22 younger (18–35 years) and 22 older (60–78 years) listeners with normal hearing. We also assessed receptive vocabulary, lexical access time, verbal working memory, and hearing thresholds as measures of individual differences. Age group, SNR level, vocabulary size, and lexical access time were significant predictors of individual speech recognition scores, but working memory and hearing threshold were not. Interestingly, longer accessing times were correlated with better speech recognition scores. Hierarchical regression models for each subset of age group and SNR showed very similar patterns: the combination of vocabulary size and lexical access time contributed most to speech recognition performance; only for the younger group at the better SNR (yielding about 85% correct speech recognition) did vocabulary size alone predict performance. Our data suggest that successful speech recognition in noise is mainly modulated by the efficiency of lexical access. This suggests that older adults’ poorer performance in the speech recognition task may have arisen from reduced efficiency in lexical access; with an average vocabulary size similar to that of younger adults, they were still slower in lexical access. Frontiers Media S.A. 2016-07-04 /pmc/articles/PMC4930932/ /pubmed/27458400 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00990 Text en Copyright © 2016 Carroll, Warzybok, Kollmeier and Ruigendijk. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Psychology Carroll, Rebecca Warzybok, Anna Kollmeier, Birger Ruigendijk, Esther Age-Related Differences in Lexical Access Relate to Speech Recognition in Noise |
title | Age-Related Differences in Lexical Access Relate to Speech Recognition in Noise |
title_full | Age-Related Differences in Lexical Access Relate to Speech Recognition in Noise |
title_fullStr | Age-Related Differences in Lexical Access Relate to Speech Recognition in Noise |
title_full_unstemmed | Age-Related Differences in Lexical Access Relate to Speech Recognition in Noise |
title_short | Age-Related Differences in Lexical Access Relate to Speech Recognition in Noise |
title_sort | age-related differences in lexical access relate to speech recognition in noise |
topic | Psychology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4930932/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27458400 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00990 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT carrollrebecca agerelateddifferencesinlexicalaccessrelatetospeechrecognitioninnoise AT warzybokanna agerelateddifferencesinlexicalaccessrelatetospeechrecognitioninnoise AT kollmeierbirger agerelateddifferencesinlexicalaccessrelatetospeechrecognitioninnoise AT ruigendijkesther agerelateddifferencesinlexicalaccessrelatetospeechrecognitioninnoise |