Cargando…

Clinical and Laboratory Diagnosis of Buruli Ulcer Disease: A Systematic Review

Background. Buruli ulcer (BU) is a necrotizing cutaneous infection caused by Mycobacterium ulcerans. Early diagnosis is crucial to prevent morbid effects and misuse of drugs. We review developments in laboratory diagnosis of BU, discuss limitations of available diagnostic methods, and give a perspec...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sakyi, Samuel A., Aboagye, Samuel Y., Darko Otchere, Isaac, Yeboah-Manu, Dorothy
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4931084/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27413382
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/5310718
_version_ 1782440835325886464
author Sakyi, Samuel A.
Aboagye, Samuel Y.
Darko Otchere, Isaac
Yeboah-Manu, Dorothy
author_facet Sakyi, Samuel A.
Aboagye, Samuel Y.
Darko Otchere, Isaac
Yeboah-Manu, Dorothy
author_sort Sakyi, Samuel A.
collection PubMed
description Background. Buruli ulcer (BU) is a necrotizing cutaneous infection caused by Mycobacterium ulcerans. Early diagnosis is crucial to prevent morbid effects and misuse of drugs. We review developments in laboratory diagnosis of BU, discuss limitations of available diagnostic methods, and give a perspective on the potential of using aptamers as point-of-care. Methods. Information for this review was searched through PubMed, web of knowledge, and identified data up to December 2015. References from relevant articles and reports from WHO Annual Meeting of the Global Buruli Ulcer initiative were also used. Finally, 59 articles were used. Results. The main laboratory methods for BU diagnosis are microscopy, culture, PCR, and histopathology. Microscopy and PCR are used routinely for diagnosis. PCR targeting IS2404 is the gold standard for laboratory confirmation. Culture remains the only method that detects viable bacilli, used for diagnosing relapse and accrued isolates for epidemiological investigation as well as monitoring drug resistance. Laboratory confirmation is done at centers distant from endemic communities reducing confirmation to a quality assurance. Conclusions. Current efforts aimed at developing point-of-care diagnostics are saddled with major drawbacks; we, however, postulate that selection of aptamers against MU target can be used as point of care.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4931084
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Hindawi Publishing Corporation
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-49310842016-07-13 Clinical and Laboratory Diagnosis of Buruli Ulcer Disease: A Systematic Review Sakyi, Samuel A. Aboagye, Samuel Y. Darko Otchere, Isaac Yeboah-Manu, Dorothy Can J Infect Dis Med Microbiol Review Article Background. Buruli ulcer (BU) is a necrotizing cutaneous infection caused by Mycobacterium ulcerans. Early diagnosis is crucial to prevent morbid effects and misuse of drugs. We review developments in laboratory diagnosis of BU, discuss limitations of available diagnostic methods, and give a perspective on the potential of using aptamers as point-of-care. Methods. Information for this review was searched through PubMed, web of knowledge, and identified data up to December 2015. References from relevant articles and reports from WHO Annual Meeting of the Global Buruli Ulcer initiative were also used. Finally, 59 articles were used. Results. The main laboratory methods for BU diagnosis are microscopy, culture, PCR, and histopathology. Microscopy and PCR are used routinely for diagnosis. PCR targeting IS2404 is the gold standard for laboratory confirmation. Culture remains the only method that detects viable bacilli, used for diagnosing relapse and accrued isolates for epidemiological investigation as well as monitoring drug resistance. Laboratory confirmation is done at centers distant from endemic communities reducing confirmation to a quality assurance. Conclusions. Current efforts aimed at developing point-of-care diagnostics are saddled with major drawbacks; we, however, postulate that selection of aptamers against MU target can be used as point of care. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2016 2016-06-20 /pmc/articles/PMC4931084/ /pubmed/27413382 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/5310718 Text en Copyright © 2016 Samuel A. Sakyi et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Review Article
Sakyi, Samuel A.
Aboagye, Samuel Y.
Darko Otchere, Isaac
Yeboah-Manu, Dorothy
Clinical and Laboratory Diagnosis of Buruli Ulcer Disease: A Systematic Review
title Clinical and Laboratory Diagnosis of Buruli Ulcer Disease: A Systematic Review
title_full Clinical and Laboratory Diagnosis of Buruli Ulcer Disease: A Systematic Review
title_fullStr Clinical and Laboratory Diagnosis of Buruli Ulcer Disease: A Systematic Review
title_full_unstemmed Clinical and Laboratory Diagnosis of Buruli Ulcer Disease: A Systematic Review
title_short Clinical and Laboratory Diagnosis of Buruli Ulcer Disease: A Systematic Review
title_sort clinical and laboratory diagnosis of buruli ulcer disease: a systematic review
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4931084/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27413382
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/5310718
work_keys_str_mv AT sakyisamuela clinicalandlaboratorydiagnosisofburuliulcerdiseaseasystematicreview
AT aboagyesamuely clinicalandlaboratorydiagnosisofburuliulcerdiseaseasystematicreview
AT darkootchereisaac clinicalandlaboratorydiagnosisofburuliulcerdiseaseasystematicreview
AT yeboahmanudorothy clinicalandlaboratorydiagnosisofburuliulcerdiseaseasystematicreview