Cargando…

Reliability of Various Measurement Stations for Determining Plantar Fascia Thickness and Echogenicity

This study aimed to determine the relative and absolute reliability of ultrasound (US) measurements of the thickness and echogenicity of the plantar fascia (PF) at different measurement stations along its length using a standardized protocol. Twelve healthy subjects (24 feet) were enrolled. The PF w...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bisi-Balogun, Adebisi, Cassel, Michael, Mayer, Frank
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4931410/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27089369
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics6020015
_version_ 1782440887893098496
author Bisi-Balogun, Adebisi
Cassel, Michael
Mayer, Frank
author_facet Bisi-Balogun, Adebisi
Cassel, Michael
Mayer, Frank
author_sort Bisi-Balogun, Adebisi
collection PubMed
description This study aimed to determine the relative and absolute reliability of ultrasound (US) measurements of the thickness and echogenicity of the plantar fascia (PF) at different measurement stations along its length using a standardized protocol. Twelve healthy subjects (24 feet) were enrolled. The PF was imaged in the longitudinal plane. Subjects were assessed twice to evaluate the intra-rater reliability. A quantitative evaluation of the thickness and echogenicity of the plantar fascia was performed using Image J, a digital image analysis and viewer software. A sonography evaluation of the thickness and echogenicity of the PF showed a high relative reliability with an Intra class correlation coefficient of ≥0.88 at all measurement stations. However, the measurement stations for both the PF thickness and echogenicity which showed the highest intraclass correlation coefficient (ICCs) did not have the highest absolute reliability. Compared to other measurement stations, measuring the PF thickness at 3 cm distal and the echogenicity at a region of interest 1 cm to 2 cm distal from its insertion at the medial calcaneal tubercle showed the highest absolute reliability with the least systematic bias and random error. Also, the reliability was higher using a mean of three measurements compared to one measurement. To reduce discrepancies in the interpretation of the thickness and echogenicity measurements of the PF, the absolute reliability of the different measurement stations should be considered in clinical practice and research rather than the relative reliability with the ICC.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4931410
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-49314102016-07-08 Reliability of Various Measurement Stations for Determining Plantar Fascia Thickness and Echogenicity Bisi-Balogun, Adebisi Cassel, Michael Mayer, Frank Diagnostics (Basel) Article This study aimed to determine the relative and absolute reliability of ultrasound (US) measurements of the thickness and echogenicity of the plantar fascia (PF) at different measurement stations along its length using a standardized protocol. Twelve healthy subjects (24 feet) were enrolled. The PF was imaged in the longitudinal plane. Subjects were assessed twice to evaluate the intra-rater reliability. A quantitative evaluation of the thickness and echogenicity of the plantar fascia was performed using Image J, a digital image analysis and viewer software. A sonography evaluation of the thickness and echogenicity of the PF showed a high relative reliability with an Intra class correlation coefficient of ≥0.88 at all measurement stations. However, the measurement stations for both the PF thickness and echogenicity which showed the highest intraclass correlation coefficient (ICCs) did not have the highest absolute reliability. Compared to other measurement stations, measuring the PF thickness at 3 cm distal and the echogenicity at a region of interest 1 cm to 2 cm distal from its insertion at the medial calcaneal tubercle showed the highest absolute reliability with the least systematic bias and random error. Also, the reliability was higher using a mean of three measurements compared to one measurement. To reduce discrepancies in the interpretation of the thickness and echogenicity measurements of the PF, the absolute reliability of the different measurement stations should be considered in clinical practice and research rather than the relative reliability with the ICC. MDPI 2016-04-13 /pmc/articles/PMC4931410/ /pubmed/27089369 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics6020015 Text en © 2016 by the authors; licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons by Attribution (CC-BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Bisi-Balogun, Adebisi
Cassel, Michael
Mayer, Frank
Reliability of Various Measurement Stations for Determining Plantar Fascia Thickness and Echogenicity
title Reliability of Various Measurement Stations for Determining Plantar Fascia Thickness and Echogenicity
title_full Reliability of Various Measurement Stations for Determining Plantar Fascia Thickness and Echogenicity
title_fullStr Reliability of Various Measurement Stations for Determining Plantar Fascia Thickness and Echogenicity
title_full_unstemmed Reliability of Various Measurement Stations for Determining Plantar Fascia Thickness and Echogenicity
title_short Reliability of Various Measurement Stations for Determining Plantar Fascia Thickness and Echogenicity
title_sort reliability of various measurement stations for determining plantar fascia thickness and echogenicity
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4931410/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27089369
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics6020015
work_keys_str_mv AT bisibalogunadebisi reliabilityofvariousmeasurementstationsfordeterminingplantarfasciathicknessandechogenicity
AT casselmichael reliabilityofvariousmeasurementstationsfordeterminingplantarfasciathicknessandechogenicity
AT mayerfrank reliabilityofvariousmeasurementstationsfordeterminingplantarfasciathicknessandechogenicity