Cargando…

Pheromone Autodetection: Evidence and Implications

Olfactory communication research with insects utilizing sex pheromones has focused on the effects of pheromones on signal receivers. Early pheromone detection studies using the silkworm moth, Bombyx mori L., and Saturniids led to the assumption that emitters, especially females, are unable to detect...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Holdcraft, Robert, Rodriguez-Saona, Cesar, Stelinski, Lukasz L.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4931429/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27120623
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/insects7020017
_version_ 1782440892216377344
author Holdcraft, Robert
Rodriguez-Saona, Cesar
Stelinski, Lukasz L.
author_facet Holdcraft, Robert
Rodriguez-Saona, Cesar
Stelinski, Lukasz L.
author_sort Holdcraft, Robert
collection PubMed
description Olfactory communication research with insects utilizing sex pheromones has focused on the effects of pheromones on signal receivers. Early pheromone detection studies using the silkworm moth, Bombyx mori L., and Saturniids led to the assumption that emitters, especially females, are unable to detect their own pheromone. Pheromone anosmia, i.e., the inability of females to detect their conspecific sex pheromone, was often assumed, and initially little attention was paid to female behaviors that may result from autodetection, i.e., the ability of females to detect their sex pheromone. Detection of conspecific pheromone plumes from nearby females may provide information to improve chances of mating success and progeny survival. Since the first documented example in 1972, numerous occurrences of autodetection have been observed and verified in field and laboratory studies. We summarize here a significant portion of research relating to autodetection. Electrophysiological and behavioral investigations, as well as expression patterns of proteins involved in pheromone autodetection are included. We discuss problems inherent in defining a boundary between sex and aggregation pheromones considering the occurrence of autodetection, and summarize hypothesized selection pressures favoring autodetection. Importance of including autodetection studies in future work is emphasized by complications arising from a lack of knowledge combined with expanding the use of pheromones in agriculture.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4931429
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-49314292016-07-08 Pheromone Autodetection: Evidence and Implications Holdcraft, Robert Rodriguez-Saona, Cesar Stelinski, Lukasz L. Insects Review Olfactory communication research with insects utilizing sex pheromones has focused on the effects of pheromones on signal receivers. Early pheromone detection studies using the silkworm moth, Bombyx mori L., and Saturniids led to the assumption that emitters, especially females, are unable to detect their own pheromone. Pheromone anosmia, i.e., the inability of females to detect their conspecific sex pheromone, was often assumed, and initially little attention was paid to female behaviors that may result from autodetection, i.e., the ability of females to detect their sex pheromone. Detection of conspecific pheromone plumes from nearby females may provide information to improve chances of mating success and progeny survival. Since the first documented example in 1972, numerous occurrences of autodetection have been observed and verified in field and laboratory studies. We summarize here a significant portion of research relating to autodetection. Electrophysiological and behavioral investigations, as well as expression patterns of proteins involved in pheromone autodetection are included. We discuss problems inherent in defining a boundary between sex and aggregation pheromones considering the occurrence of autodetection, and summarize hypothesized selection pressures favoring autodetection. Importance of including autodetection studies in future work is emphasized by complications arising from a lack of knowledge combined with expanding the use of pheromones in agriculture. MDPI 2016-04-25 /pmc/articles/PMC4931429/ /pubmed/27120623 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/insects7020017 Text en © 2016 by the authors; licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review
Holdcraft, Robert
Rodriguez-Saona, Cesar
Stelinski, Lukasz L.
Pheromone Autodetection: Evidence and Implications
title Pheromone Autodetection: Evidence and Implications
title_full Pheromone Autodetection: Evidence and Implications
title_fullStr Pheromone Autodetection: Evidence and Implications
title_full_unstemmed Pheromone Autodetection: Evidence and Implications
title_short Pheromone Autodetection: Evidence and Implications
title_sort pheromone autodetection: evidence and implications
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4931429/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27120623
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/insects7020017
work_keys_str_mv AT holdcraftrobert pheromoneautodetectionevidenceandimplications
AT rodriguezsaonacesar pheromoneautodetectionevidenceandimplications
AT stelinskilukaszl pheromoneautodetectionevidenceandimplications