Cargando…

Fecal Immunochemical Tests Combined With Other Stool Tests for Colorectal Cancer and Advanced Adenoma Detection: A Systematic Review

OBJECTIVES: Despite moderate to high detection rates of fecal immunochemical tests (FITs) of colorectal cancer (CRC), detection of adenomas remains limited. Further stool tests exist, which are not used in routine practice, such as DNA or RNA markers and protein markers. We aimed at systematically i...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Niedermaier, Tobias, Weigl, Korbinian, Hoffmeister, Michael, Brenner, Hermann
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4931594/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27253514
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ctg.2016.29
_version_ 1782440925161586688
author Niedermaier, Tobias
Weigl, Korbinian
Hoffmeister, Michael
Brenner, Hermann
author_facet Niedermaier, Tobias
Weigl, Korbinian
Hoffmeister, Michael
Brenner, Hermann
author_sort Niedermaier, Tobias
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: Despite moderate to high detection rates of fecal immunochemical tests (FITs) of colorectal cancer (CRC), detection of adenomas remains limited. Further stool tests exist, which are not used in routine practice, such as DNA or RNA markers and protein markers. We aimed at systematically investigating and summarizing evidence for diagnostic performance of combinations of FIT with other stool tests compared with FIT alone in early detection of CRC and its precursors. METHODS: We systematically reviewed studies that evaluated FITs in combination with other stool tests and compared measures of diagnostic accuracy with and without additional stool tests. PubMed and Web of Science were searched from inception to May 2015. Reference lists of eligible studies were also screened. Two reviewers extracted data independently. RESULTS: Some of the reports on DNA, RNA, or tissue tests, including tests based on DNA mutations, methylation, and integrity in selected genes as well as microRNA expression, showed some improvements of diagnostic test accuracy. In contrast, so far assessed stool protein markers did generally not lead to substantial improvements in performance of FIT when added to the latter. Many marker combinations were reported only in one study each, and few studies were conducted in a true screening setting. CONCLUSIONS: Several stool markers show potential to improve performance of FITs. However, the results require confirmation in further studies, which should also evaluate the costs and cost-effectiveness of combined screening strategies.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4931594
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Nature Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-49315942016-07-14 Fecal Immunochemical Tests Combined With Other Stool Tests for Colorectal Cancer and Advanced Adenoma Detection: A Systematic Review Niedermaier, Tobias Weigl, Korbinian Hoffmeister, Michael Brenner, Hermann Clin Transl Gastroenterol Clinical and Systematic Reviews OBJECTIVES: Despite moderate to high detection rates of fecal immunochemical tests (FITs) of colorectal cancer (CRC), detection of adenomas remains limited. Further stool tests exist, which are not used in routine practice, such as DNA or RNA markers and protein markers. We aimed at systematically investigating and summarizing evidence for diagnostic performance of combinations of FIT with other stool tests compared with FIT alone in early detection of CRC and its precursors. METHODS: We systematically reviewed studies that evaluated FITs in combination with other stool tests and compared measures of diagnostic accuracy with and without additional stool tests. PubMed and Web of Science were searched from inception to May 2015. Reference lists of eligible studies were also screened. Two reviewers extracted data independently. RESULTS: Some of the reports on DNA, RNA, or tissue tests, including tests based on DNA mutations, methylation, and integrity in selected genes as well as microRNA expression, showed some improvements of diagnostic test accuracy. In contrast, so far assessed stool protein markers did generally not lead to substantial improvements in performance of FIT when added to the latter. Many marker combinations were reported only in one study each, and few studies were conducted in a true screening setting. CONCLUSIONS: Several stool markers show potential to improve performance of FITs. However, the results require confirmation in further studies, which should also evaluate the costs and cost-effectiveness of combined screening strategies. Nature Publishing Group 2016-06 2016-06-02 /pmc/articles/PMC4931594/ /pubmed/27253514 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ctg.2016.29 Text en Copyright © 2016 American College of Gastroenterology http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ Clinical and Translational Gastroenterology is an open-access journal published by Nature Publishing Group. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
spellingShingle Clinical and Systematic Reviews
Niedermaier, Tobias
Weigl, Korbinian
Hoffmeister, Michael
Brenner, Hermann
Fecal Immunochemical Tests Combined With Other Stool Tests for Colorectal Cancer and Advanced Adenoma Detection: A Systematic Review
title Fecal Immunochemical Tests Combined With Other Stool Tests for Colorectal Cancer and Advanced Adenoma Detection: A Systematic Review
title_full Fecal Immunochemical Tests Combined With Other Stool Tests for Colorectal Cancer and Advanced Adenoma Detection: A Systematic Review
title_fullStr Fecal Immunochemical Tests Combined With Other Stool Tests for Colorectal Cancer and Advanced Adenoma Detection: A Systematic Review
title_full_unstemmed Fecal Immunochemical Tests Combined With Other Stool Tests for Colorectal Cancer and Advanced Adenoma Detection: A Systematic Review
title_short Fecal Immunochemical Tests Combined With Other Stool Tests for Colorectal Cancer and Advanced Adenoma Detection: A Systematic Review
title_sort fecal immunochemical tests combined with other stool tests for colorectal cancer and advanced adenoma detection: a systematic review
topic Clinical and Systematic Reviews
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4931594/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27253514
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ctg.2016.29
work_keys_str_mv AT niedermaiertobias fecalimmunochemicaltestscombinedwithotherstooltestsforcolorectalcancerandadvancedadenomadetectionasystematicreview
AT weiglkorbinian fecalimmunochemicaltestscombinedwithotherstooltestsforcolorectalcancerandadvancedadenomadetectionasystematicreview
AT hoffmeistermichael fecalimmunochemicaltestscombinedwithotherstooltestsforcolorectalcancerandadvancedadenomadetectionasystematicreview
AT brennerhermann fecalimmunochemicaltestscombinedwithotherstooltestsforcolorectalcancerandadvancedadenomadetectionasystematicreview