Cargando…

Customizable orthopaedic oncology implants: one institution’s experience with meeting current IRB and FDA requirements

BACKGROUND: Customizable orthopaedic implants are often needed for patients with primary malignant bone tumors due to unique anatomy or complex mechanical problems. Currently, obtaining customizable orthopaedic implants for orthopaedic oncology patients can be an arduous task involving submitting ap...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Willis, Alexander R., Ippolito, Joseph A., Patterson, Francis R., Benevenia, Joseph, Beebe, Kathleen S.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4932010/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27429877
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40064-016-2696-1
_version_ 1782440987311734784
author Willis, Alexander R.
Ippolito, Joseph A.
Patterson, Francis R.
Benevenia, Joseph
Beebe, Kathleen S.
author_facet Willis, Alexander R.
Ippolito, Joseph A.
Patterson, Francis R.
Benevenia, Joseph
Beebe, Kathleen S.
author_sort Willis, Alexander R.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Customizable orthopaedic implants are often needed for patients with primary malignant bone tumors due to unique anatomy or complex mechanical problems. Currently, obtaining customizable orthopaedic implants for orthopaedic oncology patients can be an arduous task involving submitting approval requests to the Institutional Review Board (IRB) and the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). There is great potential for the delay of a patient’s surgery and unnecessary paperwork if the submission pathways are misunderstood or a streamlined protocol is not in place. PURPOSE: The objective of this study was to review the existing FDA custom implant approval pathways and to determine whether this process was improved with an institutional protocol. METHODS: An institutional protocol for obtaining IRB and FDA approval for customizable orthopaedic implants was established with the IRB at our institution in 2013. This protocol was approved by the IRB, such that new patients only require submission of a modification to the existing protocol with individualized patient information. During the two-year period of 2013–2014, eight patients were retrospectively identified as having required customizable implants for various orthopaedic oncology surgeries. The dates of request for IRB approval, request for FDA approval, and total time to surgery were recorded, along with the specific pathway utilized for FDA approval. RESULTS: The average patient age was 12 years old (7–21 years old). The average time to IRB approval of a modification to the pre-approved protocol was 14 days (7–21 days). Average time to FDA approval after submission of the IRB approval to the manufacturer was 12.5 days (7–19 days). FDA approval was obtained for all implants as compassionate use requests in accordance with Section 561 of the Federal Food Drug and Cosmetic Act’s expanded access provisions. CONCLUSIONS: Establishment of an institutional protocol with pre-approval by the IRB can expedite the otherwise time-consuming and complicated process of obtaining customizable orthopaedic implants for orthopaedic oncology patients. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Retrospective case series, Level IV. See the Guidelines for authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4932010
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-49320102016-07-16 Customizable orthopaedic oncology implants: one institution’s experience with meeting current IRB and FDA requirements Willis, Alexander R. Ippolito, Joseph A. Patterson, Francis R. Benevenia, Joseph Beebe, Kathleen S. Springerplus Research BACKGROUND: Customizable orthopaedic implants are often needed for patients with primary malignant bone tumors due to unique anatomy or complex mechanical problems. Currently, obtaining customizable orthopaedic implants for orthopaedic oncology patients can be an arduous task involving submitting approval requests to the Institutional Review Board (IRB) and the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). There is great potential for the delay of a patient’s surgery and unnecessary paperwork if the submission pathways are misunderstood or a streamlined protocol is not in place. PURPOSE: The objective of this study was to review the existing FDA custom implant approval pathways and to determine whether this process was improved with an institutional protocol. METHODS: An institutional protocol for obtaining IRB and FDA approval for customizable orthopaedic implants was established with the IRB at our institution in 2013. This protocol was approved by the IRB, such that new patients only require submission of a modification to the existing protocol with individualized patient information. During the two-year period of 2013–2014, eight patients were retrospectively identified as having required customizable implants for various orthopaedic oncology surgeries. The dates of request for IRB approval, request for FDA approval, and total time to surgery were recorded, along with the specific pathway utilized for FDA approval. RESULTS: The average patient age was 12 years old (7–21 years old). The average time to IRB approval of a modification to the pre-approved protocol was 14 days (7–21 days). Average time to FDA approval after submission of the IRB approval to the manufacturer was 12.5 days (7–19 days). FDA approval was obtained for all implants as compassionate use requests in accordance with Section 561 of the Federal Food Drug and Cosmetic Act’s expanded access provisions. CONCLUSIONS: Establishment of an institutional protocol with pre-approval by the IRB can expedite the otherwise time-consuming and complicated process of obtaining customizable orthopaedic implants for orthopaedic oncology patients. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Retrospective case series, Level IV. See the Guidelines for authors for a complete description of levels of evidence. Springer International Publishing 2016-07-04 /pmc/articles/PMC4932010/ /pubmed/27429877 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40064-016-2696-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Research
Willis, Alexander R.
Ippolito, Joseph A.
Patterson, Francis R.
Benevenia, Joseph
Beebe, Kathleen S.
Customizable orthopaedic oncology implants: one institution’s experience with meeting current IRB and FDA requirements
title Customizable orthopaedic oncology implants: one institution’s experience with meeting current IRB and FDA requirements
title_full Customizable orthopaedic oncology implants: one institution’s experience with meeting current IRB and FDA requirements
title_fullStr Customizable orthopaedic oncology implants: one institution’s experience with meeting current IRB and FDA requirements
title_full_unstemmed Customizable orthopaedic oncology implants: one institution’s experience with meeting current IRB and FDA requirements
title_short Customizable orthopaedic oncology implants: one institution’s experience with meeting current IRB and FDA requirements
title_sort customizable orthopaedic oncology implants: one institution’s experience with meeting current irb and fda requirements
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4932010/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27429877
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40064-016-2696-1
work_keys_str_mv AT willisalexanderr customizableorthopaediconcologyimplantsoneinstitutionsexperiencewithmeetingcurrentirbandfdarequirements
AT ippolitojosepha customizableorthopaediconcologyimplantsoneinstitutionsexperiencewithmeetingcurrentirbandfdarequirements
AT pattersonfrancisr customizableorthopaediconcologyimplantsoneinstitutionsexperiencewithmeetingcurrentirbandfdarequirements
AT beneveniajoseph customizableorthopaediconcologyimplantsoneinstitutionsexperiencewithmeetingcurrentirbandfdarequirements
AT beebekathleens customizableorthopaediconcologyimplantsoneinstitutionsexperiencewithmeetingcurrentirbandfdarequirements