Cargando…

In vitro and in vivo evaluation of protein quality of enzymatic treated feather meals

Feeding trials were designed to evaluate the nutritive value of feather meal treated by K6 and K82 keratinase. There were five treatments in feather meal preparation: CFM (non-enzymatically treated feather meal), K6FM (K6 keratinase treated feather meal), K82FM (K82 keratinase treated feather meal),...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Eaksuree, Warintorn, Prachayakitti, Akkharadet, Upathanpreecha, Tewa, Taharnklaew, Rutjawate, Nitisinprasert, Sunee, Keawsompong, Suttipun
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4932015/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27429881
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40064-016-2626-2
_version_ 1782440988527034368
author Eaksuree, Warintorn
Prachayakitti, Akkharadet
Upathanpreecha, Tewa
Taharnklaew, Rutjawate
Nitisinprasert, Sunee
Keawsompong, Suttipun
author_facet Eaksuree, Warintorn
Prachayakitti, Akkharadet
Upathanpreecha, Tewa
Taharnklaew, Rutjawate
Nitisinprasert, Sunee
Keawsompong, Suttipun
author_sort Eaksuree, Warintorn
collection PubMed
description Feeding trials were designed to evaluate the nutritive value of feather meal treated by K6 and K82 keratinase. There were five treatments in feather meal preparation: CFM (non-enzymatically treated feather meal), K6FM (K6 keratinase treated feather meal), K82FM (K82 keratinase treated feather meal), K6:K82FM [K6 and K82 keratinase (5:1) treated feather meal] and CMFM (commercial enzyme treated feather meal). The pepsin digestibility of CFM (70 %) and CMFM (68 %) was significantly higher than K6FM (60 %), K82FM (61 %) and K6:K82FM (63 %). Total amino acid content of K82FM (89.65/100 g) was the highest compared with the other treatments. The nutrient digestibility of the feather meals was determined for broiler chicks between 21 and 27 days old. The apparent nitrogen retention of K82FM (85.82 %) and K6FM (77.31 %) was significantly higher than K6:K82FM (55.42 %), CMFM (45.70 %) and CFM (48.16 %). The apparent metabolisable energy (AME(n)) was not significantly different between the feather meal treatments, although K82FM, K6FM and K6:K82FM showed AME(n) higher than CMFM and CFM. The results indicated that both K6 and K82 keratinase had a positive effect on the protein quality of the feather meal produced by the enzymatic–hydrothermal method.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4932015
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-49320152016-07-16 In vitro and in vivo evaluation of protein quality of enzymatic treated feather meals Eaksuree, Warintorn Prachayakitti, Akkharadet Upathanpreecha, Tewa Taharnklaew, Rutjawate Nitisinprasert, Sunee Keawsompong, Suttipun Springerplus Research Feeding trials were designed to evaluate the nutritive value of feather meal treated by K6 and K82 keratinase. There were five treatments in feather meal preparation: CFM (non-enzymatically treated feather meal), K6FM (K6 keratinase treated feather meal), K82FM (K82 keratinase treated feather meal), K6:K82FM [K6 and K82 keratinase (5:1) treated feather meal] and CMFM (commercial enzyme treated feather meal). The pepsin digestibility of CFM (70 %) and CMFM (68 %) was significantly higher than K6FM (60 %), K82FM (61 %) and K6:K82FM (63 %). Total amino acid content of K82FM (89.65/100 g) was the highest compared with the other treatments. The nutrient digestibility of the feather meals was determined for broiler chicks between 21 and 27 days old. The apparent nitrogen retention of K82FM (85.82 %) and K6FM (77.31 %) was significantly higher than K6:K82FM (55.42 %), CMFM (45.70 %) and CFM (48.16 %). The apparent metabolisable energy (AME(n)) was not significantly different between the feather meal treatments, although K82FM, K6FM and K6:K82FM showed AME(n) higher than CMFM and CFM. The results indicated that both K6 and K82 keratinase had a positive effect on the protein quality of the feather meal produced by the enzymatic–hydrothermal method. Springer International Publishing 2016-07-04 /pmc/articles/PMC4932015/ /pubmed/27429881 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40064-016-2626-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Research
Eaksuree, Warintorn
Prachayakitti, Akkharadet
Upathanpreecha, Tewa
Taharnklaew, Rutjawate
Nitisinprasert, Sunee
Keawsompong, Suttipun
In vitro and in vivo evaluation of protein quality of enzymatic treated feather meals
title In vitro and in vivo evaluation of protein quality of enzymatic treated feather meals
title_full In vitro and in vivo evaluation of protein quality of enzymatic treated feather meals
title_fullStr In vitro and in vivo evaluation of protein quality of enzymatic treated feather meals
title_full_unstemmed In vitro and in vivo evaluation of protein quality of enzymatic treated feather meals
title_short In vitro and in vivo evaluation of protein quality of enzymatic treated feather meals
title_sort in vitro and in vivo evaluation of protein quality of enzymatic treated feather meals
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4932015/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27429881
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40064-016-2626-2
work_keys_str_mv AT eaksureewarintorn invitroandinvivoevaluationofproteinqualityofenzymatictreatedfeathermeals
AT prachayakittiakkharadet invitroandinvivoevaluationofproteinqualityofenzymatictreatedfeathermeals
AT upathanpreechatewa invitroandinvivoevaluationofproteinqualityofenzymatictreatedfeathermeals
AT taharnklaewrutjawate invitroandinvivoevaluationofproteinqualityofenzymatictreatedfeathermeals
AT nitisinprasertsunee invitroandinvivoevaluationofproteinqualityofenzymatictreatedfeathermeals
AT keawsompongsuttipun invitroandinvivoevaluationofproteinqualityofenzymatictreatedfeathermeals