Cargando…
In vitro and in vivo evaluation of protein quality of enzymatic treated feather meals
Feeding trials were designed to evaluate the nutritive value of feather meal treated by K6 and K82 keratinase. There were five treatments in feather meal preparation: CFM (non-enzymatically treated feather meal), K6FM (K6 keratinase treated feather meal), K82FM (K82 keratinase treated feather meal),...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer International Publishing
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4932015/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27429881 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40064-016-2626-2 |
_version_ | 1782440988527034368 |
---|---|
author | Eaksuree, Warintorn Prachayakitti, Akkharadet Upathanpreecha, Tewa Taharnklaew, Rutjawate Nitisinprasert, Sunee Keawsompong, Suttipun |
author_facet | Eaksuree, Warintorn Prachayakitti, Akkharadet Upathanpreecha, Tewa Taharnklaew, Rutjawate Nitisinprasert, Sunee Keawsompong, Suttipun |
author_sort | Eaksuree, Warintorn |
collection | PubMed |
description | Feeding trials were designed to evaluate the nutritive value of feather meal treated by K6 and K82 keratinase. There were five treatments in feather meal preparation: CFM (non-enzymatically treated feather meal), K6FM (K6 keratinase treated feather meal), K82FM (K82 keratinase treated feather meal), K6:K82FM [K6 and K82 keratinase (5:1) treated feather meal] and CMFM (commercial enzyme treated feather meal). The pepsin digestibility of CFM (70 %) and CMFM (68 %) was significantly higher than K6FM (60 %), K82FM (61 %) and K6:K82FM (63 %). Total amino acid content of K82FM (89.65/100 g) was the highest compared with the other treatments. The nutrient digestibility of the feather meals was determined for broiler chicks between 21 and 27 days old. The apparent nitrogen retention of K82FM (85.82 %) and K6FM (77.31 %) was significantly higher than K6:K82FM (55.42 %), CMFM (45.70 %) and CFM (48.16 %). The apparent metabolisable energy (AME(n)) was not significantly different between the feather meal treatments, although K82FM, K6FM and K6:K82FM showed AME(n) higher than CMFM and CFM. The results indicated that both K6 and K82 keratinase had a positive effect on the protein quality of the feather meal produced by the enzymatic–hydrothermal method. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4932015 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Springer International Publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-49320152016-07-16 In vitro and in vivo evaluation of protein quality of enzymatic treated feather meals Eaksuree, Warintorn Prachayakitti, Akkharadet Upathanpreecha, Tewa Taharnklaew, Rutjawate Nitisinprasert, Sunee Keawsompong, Suttipun Springerplus Research Feeding trials were designed to evaluate the nutritive value of feather meal treated by K6 and K82 keratinase. There were five treatments in feather meal preparation: CFM (non-enzymatically treated feather meal), K6FM (K6 keratinase treated feather meal), K82FM (K82 keratinase treated feather meal), K6:K82FM [K6 and K82 keratinase (5:1) treated feather meal] and CMFM (commercial enzyme treated feather meal). The pepsin digestibility of CFM (70 %) and CMFM (68 %) was significantly higher than K6FM (60 %), K82FM (61 %) and K6:K82FM (63 %). Total amino acid content of K82FM (89.65/100 g) was the highest compared with the other treatments. The nutrient digestibility of the feather meals was determined for broiler chicks between 21 and 27 days old. The apparent nitrogen retention of K82FM (85.82 %) and K6FM (77.31 %) was significantly higher than K6:K82FM (55.42 %), CMFM (45.70 %) and CFM (48.16 %). The apparent metabolisable energy (AME(n)) was not significantly different between the feather meal treatments, although K82FM, K6FM and K6:K82FM showed AME(n) higher than CMFM and CFM. The results indicated that both K6 and K82 keratinase had a positive effect on the protein quality of the feather meal produced by the enzymatic–hydrothermal method. Springer International Publishing 2016-07-04 /pmc/articles/PMC4932015/ /pubmed/27429881 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40064-016-2626-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. |
spellingShingle | Research Eaksuree, Warintorn Prachayakitti, Akkharadet Upathanpreecha, Tewa Taharnklaew, Rutjawate Nitisinprasert, Sunee Keawsompong, Suttipun In vitro and in vivo evaluation of protein quality of enzymatic treated feather meals |
title | In vitro and in vivo evaluation of protein quality of enzymatic treated feather meals |
title_full | In vitro and in vivo evaluation of protein quality of enzymatic treated feather meals |
title_fullStr | In vitro and in vivo evaluation of protein quality of enzymatic treated feather meals |
title_full_unstemmed | In vitro and in vivo evaluation of protein quality of enzymatic treated feather meals |
title_short | In vitro and in vivo evaluation of protein quality of enzymatic treated feather meals |
title_sort | in vitro and in vivo evaluation of protein quality of enzymatic treated feather meals |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4932015/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27429881 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40064-016-2626-2 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT eaksureewarintorn invitroandinvivoevaluationofproteinqualityofenzymatictreatedfeathermeals AT prachayakittiakkharadet invitroandinvivoevaluationofproteinqualityofenzymatictreatedfeathermeals AT upathanpreechatewa invitroandinvivoevaluationofproteinqualityofenzymatictreatedfeathermeals AT taharnklaewrutjawate invitroandinvivoevaluationofproteinqualityofenzymatictreatedfeathermeals AT nitisinprasertsunee invitroandinvivoevaluationofproteinqualityofenzymatictreatedfeathermeals AT keawsompongsuttipun invitroandinvivoevaluationofproteinqualityofenzymatictreatedfeathermeals |