Cargando…

Canadian Association of Gastroenterology Indicators of Safety Compromise following Colonoscopy in Clinical Practice

In 2012 the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology published 19 indicators of safety compromise. We studied the incidence of these indicators by reviewing all colonoscopies performed in St. John's, NL, between January 1, 2012, and June 30, 2012. Results. A total of 3235 colonoscopies were inc...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Borgaonkar, Mark R., Pace, David, Lougheed, Muna, Marcoux, Curtis, Evans, Bradley, Hickey, Nikita, O'Leary, Meghan, McGrath, Jerry
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4932159/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27446832
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/2729871
_version_ 1782441020618702848
author Borgaonkar, Mark R.
Pace, David
Lougheed, Muna
Marcoux, Curtis
Evans, Bradley
Hickey, Nikita
O'Leary, Meghan
McGrath, Jerry
author_facet Borgaonkar, Mark R.
Pace, David
Lougheed, Muna
Marcoux, Curtis
Evans, Bradley
Hickey, Nikita
O'Leary, Meghan
McGrath, Jerry
author_sort Borgaonkar, Mark R.
collection PubMed
description In 2012 the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology published 19 indicators of safety compromise. We studied the incidence of these indicators by reviewing all colonoscopies performed in St. John's, NL, between January 1, 2012, and June 30, 2012. Results. A total of 3235 colonoscopies were included. Adverse events are as follows. Medication-related includes use of reversal agents 0.1%, hypoxia 9.9%, hypotension 15.4%, and hypertension 0.9%. No patients required CPR or experienced allergic reactions or laryngospasm/bronchospasm. The indicator, “sedation dosages in patients older than 70,” showed lower usage of fentanyl and midazolam in elderly patients. Procedure-related immediate includes perforation 0.2%, immediate postpolypectomy bleeding 0.3%, need for hospital admission or transfer to the emergency department 0.1%, and severe persistent abdominal pain proven not to be perforation 0.4%. Instrument impaction was not seen. Procedure-related delayed includes death within 14 days 0.1%, unplanned health care visit within 14 days of the colonoscopy 1.8%, unplanned hospitalization within 14 days of the colonoscopy 0.6%, bleeding within 14 days of colonoscopy 0.2%, infection 0.03%, and metabolic complication 0.03%. Conclusions. The most common adverse events were mild and sedation related. Rates of serious adverse events were in keeping with published reports.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4932159
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Hindawi Publishing Corporation
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-49321592016-07-14 Canadian Association of Gastroenterology Indicators of Safety Compromise following Colonoscopy in Clinical Practice Borgaonkar, Mark R. Pace, David Lougheed, Muna Marcoux, Curtis Evans, Bradley Hickey, Nikita O'Leary, Meghan McGrath, Jerry Can J Gastroenterol Hepatol Research Article In 2012 the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology published 19 indicators of safety compromise. We studied the incidence of these indicators by reviewing all colonoscopies performed in St. John's, NL, between January 1, 2012, and June 30, 2012. Results. A total of 3235 colonoscopies were included. Adverse events are as follows. Medication-related includes use of reversal agents 0.1%, hypoxia 9.9%, hypotension 15.4%, and hypertension 0.9%. No patients required CPR or experienced allergic reactions or laryngospasm/bronchospasm. The indicator, “sedation dosages in patients older than 70,” showed lower usage of fentanyl and midazolam in elderly patients. Procedure-related immediate includes perforation 0.2%, immediate postpolypectomy bleeding 0.3%, need for hospital admission or transfer to the emergency department 0.1%, and severe persistent abdominal pain proven not to be perforation 0.4%. Instrument impaction was not seen. Procedure-related delayed includes death within 14 days 0.1%, unplanned health care visit within 14 days of the colonoscopy 1.8%, unplanned hospitalization within 14 days of the colonoscopy 0.6%, bleeding within 14 days of colonoscopy 0.2%, infection 0.03%, and metabolic complication 0.03%. Conclusions. The most common adverse events were mild and sedation related. Rates of serious adverse events were in keeping with published reports. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2016 2016-06-21 /pmc/articles/PMC4932159/ /pubmed/27446832 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/2729871 Text en Copyright © 2016 Mark R. Borgaonkar et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Borgaonkar, Mark R.
Pace, David
Lougheed, Muna
Marcoux, Curtis
Evans, Bradley
Hickey, Nikita
O'Leary, Meghan
McGrath, Jerry
Canadian Association of Gastroenterology Indicators of Safety Compromise following Colonoscopy in Clinical Practice
title Canadian Association of Gastroenterology Indicators of Safety Compromise following Colonoscopy in Clinical Practice
title_full Canadian Association of Gastroenterology Indicators of Safety Compromise following Colonoscopy in Clinical Practice
title_fullStr Canadian Association of Gastroenterology Indicators of Safety Compromise following Colonoscopy in Clinical Practice
title_full_unstemmed Canadian Association of Gastroenterology Indicators of Safety Compromise following Colonoscopy in Clinical Practice
title_short Canadian Association of Gastroenterology Indicators of Safety Compromise following Colonoscopy in Clinical Practice
title_sort canadian association of gastroenterology indicators of safety compromise following colonoscopy in clinical practice
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4932159/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27446832
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/2729871
work_keys_str_mv AT borgaonkarmarkr canadianassociationofgastroenterologyindicatorsofsafetycompromisefollowingcolonoscopyinclinicalpractice
AT pacedavid canadianassociationofgastroenterologyindicatorsofsafetycompromisefollowingcolonoscopyinclinicalpractice
AT lougheedmuna canadianassociationofgastroenterologyindicatorsofsafetycompromisefollowingcolonoscopyinclinicalpractice
AT marcouxcurtis canadianassociationofgastroenterologyindicatorsofsafetycompromisefollowingcolonoscopyinclinicalpractice
AT evansbradley canadianassociationofgastroenterologyindicatorsofsafetycompromisefollowingcolonoscopyinclinicalpractice
AT hickeynikita canadianassociationofgastroenterologyindicatorsofsafetycompromisefollowingcolonoscopyinclinicalpractice
AT olearymeghan canadianassociationofgastroenterologyindicatorsofsafetycompromisefollowingcolonoscopyinclinicalpractice
AT mcgrathjerry canadianassociationofgastroenterologyindicatorsofsafetycompromisefollowingcolonoscopyinclinicalpractice