Cargando…

What evidence is there for a delay in diagnostic coding of RA in UK general practice records? An observational study of free text

OBJECTIVES: Much research with electronic health records (EHRs) uses coded or structured data only; important information captured in the free text remains unused. One dimension of EHR data quality assessment is ‘currency’ or timeliness, that is, data are representative of the patient state at the t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ford, Elizabeth, Carroll, John, Smith, Helen, Davies, Kevin, Koeling, Rob, Petersen, Irene, Rait, Greta, Cassell, Jackie
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4932264/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27354069
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2015-010393
_version_ 1782441036380897280
author Ford, Elizabeth
Carroll, John
Smith, Helen
Davies, Kevin
Koeling, Rob
Petersen, Irene
Rait, Greta
Cassell, Jackie
author_facet Ford, Elizabeth
Carroll, John
Smith, Helen
Davies, Kevin
Koeling, Rob
Petersen, Irene
Rait, Greta
Cassell, Jackie
author_sort Ford, Elizabeth
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: Much research with electronic health records (EHRs) uses coded or structured data only; important information captured in the free text remains unused. One dimension of EHR data quality assessment is ‘currency’ or timeliness, that is, data are representative of the patient state at the time of measurement. We explored the use of free text in UK general practice patient records to evaluate delays in recording of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) diagnosis. We also aimed to locate and quantify disease and diagnostic information recorded only in text. SETTING: UK general practice patient records from the Clinical Practice Research Datalink. PARTICIPANTS: 294 individuals with incident diagnosis of RA between 2005 and 2008; 204 women and 85 men, median age 63 years. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Assessment of (1) quantity and timing of text entries for disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) as a proxy for the RA disease code, and (2) quantity, location and timing of free text information relating to RA onset and diagnosis. RESULTS: Inflammatory markers, pain and DMARDs were the most common categories of disease information in text prior to RA diagnostic code; 10–37% of patients had such information only in text. Read codes associated with RA-related text included correspondence, general consultation and arthritis codes. 64 patients (22%) had DMARD text entries >14 days prior to RA code; these patients had more and earlier referrals to rheumatology, tests, swelling, pain and DMARD prescriptions, suggestive of an earlier implicit diagnosis than was recorded by the diagnostic code. CONCLUSIONS: RA-related symptoms, tests, referrals and prescriptions were recorded in free text with 22% of patients showing strong evidence of delay in coding of diagnosis. Researchers using EHRs may need to mitigate for delayed codes by incorporating text into their case-ascertainment strategies. Natural language processing techniques have the capability to do this at scale.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4932264
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-49322642016-07-12 What evidence is there for a delay in diagnostic coding of RA in UK general practice records? An observational study of free text Ford, Elizabeth Carroll, John Smith, Helen Davies, Kevin Koeling, Rob Petersen, Irene Rait, Greta Cassell, Jackie BMJ Open General practice / Family practice OBJECTIVES: Much research with electronic health records (EHRs) uses coded or structured data only; important information captured in the free text remains unused. One dimension of EHR data quality assessment is ‘currency’ or timeliness, that is, data are representative of the patient state at the time of measurement. We explored the use of free text in UK general practice patient records to evaluate delays in recording of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) diagnosis. We also aimed to locate and quantify disease and diagnostic information recorded only in text. SETTING: UK general practice patient records from the Clinical Practice Research Datalink. PARTICIPANTS: 294 individuals with incident diagnosis of RA between 2005 and 2008; 204 women and 85 men, median age 63 years. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Assessment of (1) quantity and timing of text entries for disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) as a proxy for the RA disease code, and (2) quantity, location and timing of free text information relating to RA onset and diagnosis. RESULTS: Inflammatory markers, pain and DMARDs were the most common categories of disease information in text prior to RA diagnostic code; 10–37% of patients had such information only in text. Read codes associated with RA-related text included correspondence, general consultation and arthritis codes. 64 patients (22%) had DMARD text entries >14 days prior to RA code; these patients had more and earlier referrals to rheumatology, tests, swelling, pain and DMARD prescriptions, suggestive of an earlier implicit diagnosis than was recorded by the diagnostic code. CONCLUSIONS: RA-related symptoms, tests, referrals and prescriptions were recorded in free text with 22% of patients showing strong evidence of delay in coding of diagnosis. Researchers using EHRs may need to mitigate for delayed codes by incorporating text into their case-ascertainment strategies. Natural language processing techniques have the capability to do this at scale. BMJ Publishing Group 2016-06-28 /pmc/articles/PMC4932264/ /pubmed/27354069 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2015-010393 Text en Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/ This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt and build upon this work, for commercial use, provided the original work is properly cited. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
spellingShingle General practice / Family practice
Ford, Elizabeth
Carroll, John
Smith, Helen
Davies, Kevin
Koeling, Rob
Petersen, Irene
Rait, Greta
Cassell, Jackie
What evidence is there for a delay in diagnostic coding of RA in UK general practice records? An observational study of free text
title What evidence is there for a delay in diagnostic coding of RA in UK general practice records? An observational study of free text
title_full What evidence is there for a delay in diagnostic coding of RA in UK general practice records? An observational study of free text
title_fullStr What evidence is there for a delay in diagnostic coding of RA in UK general practice records? An observational study of free text
title_full_unstemmed What evidence is there for a delay in diagnostic coding of RA in UK general practice records? An observational study of free text
title_short What evidence is there for a delay in diagnostic coding of RA in UK general practice records? An observational study of free text
title_sort what evidence is there for a delay in diagnostic coding of ra in uk general practice records? an observational study of free text
topic General practice / Family practice
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4932264/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27354069
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2015-010393
work_keys_str_mv AT fordelizabeth whatevidenceisthereforadelayindiagnosticcodingofrainukgeneralpracticerecordsanobservationalstudyoffreetext
AT carrolljohn whatevidenceisthereforadelayindiagnosticcodingofrainukgeneralpracticerecordsanobservationalstudyoffreetext
AT smithhelen whatevidenceisthereforadelayindiagnosticcodingofrainukgeneralpracticerecordsanobservationalstudyoffreetext
AT davieskevin whatevidenceisthereforadelayindiagnosticcodingofrainukgeneralpracticerecordsanobservationalstudyoffreetext
AT koelingrob whatevidenceisthereforadelayindiagnosticcodingofrainukgeneralpracticerecordsanobservationalstudyoffreetext
AT petersenirene whatevidenceisthereforadelayindiagnosticcodingofrainukgeneralpracticerecordsanobservationalstudyoffreetext
AT raitgreta whatevidenceisthereforadelayindiagnosticcodingofrainukgeneralpracticerecordsanobservationalstudyoffreetext
AT casselljackie whatevidenceisthereforadelayindiagnosticcodingofrainukgeneralpracticerecordsanobservationalstudyoffreetext