Cargando…

Utility of models to predict 28-day or 30-day unplanned hospital readmissions: an updated systematic review

OBJECTIVE: To update previous systematic review of predictive models for 28-day or 30-day unplanned hospital readmissions. DESIGN: Systematic review. SETTING/DATA SOURCE: CINAHL, Embase, MEDLINE from 2011 to 2015. PARTICIPANTS: All studies of 28-day and 30-day readmission predictive model. OUTCOME M...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhou, Huaqiong, Della, Phillip R, Roberts, Pamela, Goh, Louise, Dhaliwal, Satvinder S
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4932323/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27354072
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011060
_version_ 1782441048957517824
author Zhou, Huaqiong
Della, Phillip R
Roberts, Pamela
Goh, Louise
Dhaliwal, Satvinder S
author_facet Zhou, Huaqiong
Della, Phillip R
Roberts, Pamela
Goh, Louise
Dhaliwal, Satvinder S
author_sort Zhou, Huaqiong
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To update previous systematic review of predictive models for 28-day or 30-day unplanned hospital readmissions. DESIGN: Systematic review. SETTING/DATA SOURCE: CINAHL, Embase, MEDLINE from 2011 to 2015. PARTICIPANTS: All studies of 28-day and 30-day readmission predictive model. OUTCOME MEASURES: Characteristics of the included studies, performance of the identified predictive models and key predictive variables included in the models. RESULTS: Of 7310 records, a total of 60 studies with 73 unique predictive models met the inclusion criteria. The utilisation outcome of the models included all-cause readmissions, cardiovascular disease including pneumonia, medical conditions, surgical conditions and mental health condition-related readmissions. Overall, a wide-range C-statistic was reported in 56/60 studies (0.21–0.88). 11 of 13 predictive models for medical condition-related readmissions were found to have consistent moderate discrimination ability (C-statistic ≥0.7). Only two models were designed for the potentially preventable/avoidable readmissions and had C-statistic >0.8. The variables ‘comorbidities’, ‘length of stay’ and ‘previous admissions’ were frequently cited across 73 models. The variables ‘laboratory tests’ and ‘medication’ had more weight in the models for cardiovascular disease and medical condition-related readmissions. CONCLUSIONS: The predictive models which focused on general medical condition-related unplanned hospital readmissions reported moderate discriminative ability. Two models for potentially preventable/avoidable readmissions showed high discriminative ability. This updated systematic review, however, found inconsistent performance across the included unique 73 risk predictive models. It is critical to define clearly the utilisation outcomes and the type of accessible data source before the selection of the predictive model. Rigorous validation of the predictive models with moderate-to-high discriminative ability is essential, especially for the two models for the potentially preventable/avoidable readmissions. Given the limited available evidence, the development of a predictive model specifically for paediatric 28-day all-cause, unplanned hospital readmissions is a high priority.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4932323
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-49323232016-07-12 Utility of models to predict 28-day or 30-day unplanned hospital readmissions: an updated systematic review Zhou, Huaqiong Della, Phillip R Roberts, Pamela Goh, Louise Dhaliwal, Satvinder S BMJ Open Health Services Research OBJECTIVE: To update previous systematic review of predictive models for 28-day or 30-day unplanned hospital readmissions. DESIGN: Systematic review. SETTING/DATA SOURCE: CINAHL, Embase, MEDLINE from 2011 to 2015. PARTICIPANTS: All studies of 28-day and 30-day readmission predictive model. OUTCOME MEASURES: Characteristics of the included studies, performance of the identified predictive models and key predictive variables included in the models. RESULTS: Of 7310 records, a total of 60 studies with 73 unique predictive models met the inclusion criteria. The utilisation outcome of the models included all-cause readmissions, cardiovascular disease including pneumonia, medical conditions, surgical conditions and mental health condition-related readmissions. Overall, a wide-range C-statistic was reported in 56/60 studies (0.21–0.88). 11 of 13 predictive models for medical condition-related readmissions were found to have consistent moderate discrimination ability (C-statistic ≥0.7). Only two models were designed for the potentially preventable/avoidable readmissions and had C-statistic >0.8. The variables ‘comorbidities’, ‘length of stay’ and ‘previous admissions’ were frequently cited across 73 models. The variables ‘laboratory tests’ and ‘medication’ had more weight in the models for cardiovascular disease and medical condition-related readmissions. CONCLUSIONS: The predictive models which focused on general medical condition-related unplanned hospital readmissions reported moderate discriminative ability. Two models for potentially preventable/avoidable readmissions showed high discriminative ability. This updated systematic review, however, found inconsistent performance across the included unique 73 risk predictive models. It is critical to define clearly the utilisation outcomes and the type of accessible data source before the selection of the predictive model. Rigorous validation of the predictive models with moderate-to-high discriminative ability is essential, especially for the two models for the potentially preventable/avoidable readmissions. Given the limited available evidence, the development of a predictive model specifically for paediatric 28-day all-cause, unplanned hospital readmissions is a high priority. BMJ Publishing Group 2016-06-27 /pmc/articles/PMC4932323/ /pubmed/27354072 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011060 Text en Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/ This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
spellingShingle Health Services Research
Zhou, Huaqiong
Della, Phillip R
Roberts, Pamela
Goh, Louise
Dhaliwal, Satvinder S
Utility of models to predict 28-day or 30-day unplanned hospital readmissions: an updated systematic review
title Utility of models to predict 28-day or 30-day unplanned hospital readmissions: an updated systematic review
title_full Utility of models to predict 28-day or 30-day unplanned hospital readmissions: an updated systematic review
title_fullStr Utility of models to predict 28-day or 30-day unplanned hospital readmissions: an updated systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Utility of models to predict 28-day or 30-day unplanned hospital readmissions: an updated systematic review
title_short Utility of models to predict 28-day or 30-day unplanned hospital readmissions: an updated systematic review
title_sort utility of models to predict 28-day or 30-day unplanned hospital readmissions: an updated systematic review
topic Health Services Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4932323/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27354072
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011060
work_keys_str_mv AT zhouhuaqiong utilityofmodelstopredict28dayor30dayunplannedhospitalreadmissionsanupdatedsystematicreview
AT dellaphillipr utilityofmodelstopredict28dayor30dayunplannedhospitalreadmissionsanupdatedsystematicreview
AT robertspamela utilityofmodelstopredict28dayor30dayunplannedhospitalreadmissionsanupdatedsystematicreview
AT gohlouise utilityofmodelstopredict28dayor30dayunplannedhospitalreadmissionsanupdatedsystematicreview
AT dhaliwalsatvinders utilityofmodelstopredict28dayor30dayunplannedhospitalreadmissionsanupdatedsystematicreview