Cargando…

No attentional capture from invisible flicker

We tested whether fast flicker can capture attention using eight flicker frequencies from 20–96 Hz, including several too high to be perceived (>50 Hz). Using a 480 Hz visual display rate, we presented smoothly sampled sinusoidal temporal modulations at: 20, 30, 40, 48, 60, 69, 80, and 96 Hz. We...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Alais, David, Locke, Shannon M., Leung, Johahn, Van der Burg, Erik
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4932510/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27377759
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep29296
_version_ 1782441069091225600
author Alais, David
Locke, Shannon M.
Leung, Johahn
Van der Burg, Erik
author_facet Alais, David
Locke, Shannon M.
Leung, Johahn
Van der Burg, Erik
author_sort Alais, David
collection PubMed
description We tested whether fast flicker can capture attention using eight flicker frequencies from 20–96 Hz, including several too high to be perceived (>50 Hz). Using a 480 Hz visual display rate, we presented smoothly sampled sinusoidal temporal modulations at: 20, 30, 40, 48, 60, 69, 80, and 96 Hz. We first established flicker detection rates for each frequency. Performance was at or near ceiling until 48 Hz and dropped sharply to chance level at 60 Hz and above. We then presented the same flickering stimuli as pre-cues in a visual search task containing five elements. Flicker location varied randomly and was therefore congruent with target location on 20% of trials. Comparing congruent and incongruent trials revealed a very strong congruency effect (faster search for cued targets) for all detectable frequencies (20–48 Hz) but no effect for faster flicker rates that were detected at chance. This pattern of results (obtained with brief flicker cues: 58 ms) was replicated for long flicker cues (1000 ms) intended to allow for entrainment to the flicker frequency. These results indicate that only visible flicker serves as an exogenous attentional cue and that flicker rates too high to be perceived are completely ineffective.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4932510
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Nature Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-49325102016-07-06 No attentional capture from invisible flicker Alais, David Locke, Shannon M. Leung, Johahn Van der Burg, Erik Sci Rep Article We tested whether fast flicker can capture attention using eight flicker frequencies from 20–96 Hz, including several too high to be perceived (>50 Hz). Using a 480 Hz visual display rate, we presented smoothly sampled sinusoidal temporal modulations at: 20, 30, 40, 48, 60, 69, 80, and 96 Hz. We first established flicker detection rates for each frequency. Performance was at or near ceiling until 48 Hz and dropped sharply to chance level at 60 Hz and above. We then presented the same flickering stimuli as pre-cues in a visual search task containing five elements. Flicker location varied randomly and was therefore congruent with target location on 20% of trials. Comparing congruent and incongruent trials revealed a very strong congruency effect (faster search for cued targets) for all detectable frequencies (20–48 Hz) but no effect for faster flicker rates that were detected at chance. This pattern of results (obtained with brief flicker cues: 58 ms) was replicated for long flicker cues (1000 ms) intended to allow for entrainment to the flicker frequency. These results indicate that only visible flicker serves as an exogenous attentional cue and that flicker rates too high to be perceived are completely ineffective. Nature Publishing Group 2016-07-05 /pmc/articles/PMC4932510/ /pubmed/27377759 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep29296 Text en Copyright © 2016, Macmillan Publishers Limited http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
spellingShingle Article
Alais, David
Locke, Shannon M.
Leung, Johahn
Van der Burg, Erik
No attentional capture from invisible flicker
title No attentional capture from invisible flicker
title_full No attentional capture from invisible flicker
title_fullStr No attentional capture from invisible flicker
title_full_unstemmed No attentional capture from invisible flicker
title_short No attentional capture from invisible flicker
title_sort no attentional capture from invisible flicker
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4932510/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27377759
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep29296
work_keys_str_mv AT alaisdavid noattentionalcapturefrominvisibleflicker
AT lockeshannonm noattentionalcapturefrominvisibleflicker
AT leungjohahn noattentionalcapturefrominvisibleflicker
AT vanderburgerik noattentionalcapturefrominvisibleflicker