Cargando…

Estimation of Sensory Pork Loin Tenderness Using Warner-Bratzler Shear Force and Texture Profile Analysis Measurements

This study investigated the degree to which instrumental measurements explain the variation in pork loin tenderness as assessed by the sensory evaluation of trained panelists. Warner-Bratzler shear force (WBS) had a significant relationship with the sensory tenderness variables, such as softness, in...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Choe, Jee-Hwan, Choi, Mi-Hee, Rhee, Min-Suk, Kim, Byoung-Chul
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Asian-Australasian Association of Animal Production Societies (AAAP) and Korean Society of Animal Science and Technology (KSAST) 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4932580/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26954174
http://dx.doi.org/10.5713/ajas.15.0482
_version_ 1782441084607004672
author Choe, Jee-Hwan
Choi, Mi-Hee
Rhee, Min-Suk
Kim, Byoung-Chul
author_facet Choe, Jee-Hwan
Choi, Mi-Hee
Rhee, Min-Suk
Kim, Byoung-Chul
author_sort Choe, Jee-Hwan
collection PubMed
description This study investigated the degree to which instrumental measurements explain the variation in pork loin tenderness as assessed by the sensory evaluation of trained panelists. Warner-Bratzler shear force (WBS) had a significant relationship with the sensory tenderness variables, such as softness, initial tenderness, chewiness, and rate of breakdown. In a regression analysis, WBS could account variations in these sensory variables, though only to a limited proportion of variation. On the other hand, three parameters from texture profile analysis (TPA)—hardness, gumminess, and chewiness—were significantly correlated with all sensory evaluation variables. In particular, from the result of stepwise regression analysis, TPA hardness alone explained over 15% of variation in all sensory evaluation variables, with the exception of perceptible residue. Based on these results, TPA analysis was found to be better than WBS measurement, with the TPA parameter hardness likely to prove particularly useful, in terms of predicting pork loin tenderness as rated by trained panelists. However, sensory evaluation should be conducted to investigate practical pork tenderness perceived by consumer, because both instrumental measurements could explain only a small portion (less than 20%) of the variability in sensory evaluation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4932580
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Asian-Australasian Association of Animal Production Societies (AAAP) and Korean Society of Animal Science and Technology (KSAST)
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-49325802016-07-07 Estimation of Sensory Pork Loin Tenderness Using Warner-Bratzler Shear Force and Texture Profile Analysis Measurements Choe, Jee-Hwan Choi, Mi-Hee Rhee, Min-Suk Kim, Byoung-Chul Asian-Australas J Anim Sci Article This study investigated the degree to which instrumental measurements explain the variation in pork loin tenderness as assessed by the sensory evaluation of trained panelists. Warner-Bratzler shear force (WBS) had a significant relationship with the sensory tenderness variables, such as softness, initial tenderness, chewiness, and rate of breakdown. In a regression analysis, WBS could account variations in these sensory variables, though only to a limited proportion of variation. On the other hand, three parameters from texture profile analysis (TPA)—hardness, gumminess, and chewiness—were significantly correlated with all sensory evaluation variables. In particular, from the result of stepwise regression analysis, TPA hardness alone explained over 15% of variation in all sensory evaluation variables, with the exception of perceptible residue. Based on these results, TPA analysis was found to be better than WBS measurement, with the TPA parameter hardness likely to prove particularly useful, in terms of predicting pork loin tenderness as rated by trained panelists. However, sensory evaluation should be conducted to investigate practical pork tenderness perceived by consumer, because both instrumental measurements could explain only a small portion (less than 20%) of the variability in sensory evaluation. Asian-Australasian Association of Animal Production Societies (AAAP) and Korean Society of Animal Science and Technology (KSAST) 2016-07 2015-09-10 /pmc/articles/PMC4932580/ /pubmed/26954174 http://dx.doi.org/10.5713/ajas.15.0482 Text en Copyright © 2016 by Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/), which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Article
Choe, Jee-Hwan
Choi, Mi-Hee
Rhee, Min-Suk
Kim, Byoung-Chul
Estimation of Sensory Pork Loin Tenderness Using Warner-Bratzler Shear Force and Texture Profile Analysis Measurements
title Estimation of Sensory Pork Loin Tenderness Using Warner-Bratzler Shear Force and Texture Profile Analysis Measurements
title_full Estimation of Sensory Pork Loin Tenderness Using Warner-Bratzler Shear Force and Texture Profile Analysis Measurements
title_fullStr Estimation of Sensory Pork Loin Tenderness Using Warner-Bratzler Shear Force and Texture Profile Analysis Measurements
title_full_unstemmed Estimation of Sensory Pork Loin Tenderness Using Warner-Bratzler Shear Force and Texture Profile Analysis Measurements
title_short Estimation of Sensory Pork Loin Tenderness Using Warner-Bratzler Shear Force and Texture Profile Analysis Measurements
title_sort estimation of sensory pork loin tenderness using warner-bratzler shear force and texture profile analysis measurements
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4932580/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26954174
http://dx.doi.org/10.5713/ajas.15.0482
work_keys_str_mv AT choejeehwan estimationofsensoryporklointendernessusingwarnerbratzlershearforceandtextureprofileanalysismeasurements
AT choimihee estimationofsensoryporklointendernessusingwarnerbratzlershearforceandtextureprofileanalysismeasurements
AT rheeminsuk estimationofsensoryporklointendernessusingwarnerbratzlershearforceandtextureprofileanalysismeasurements
AT kimbyoungchul estimationofsensoryporklointendernessusingwarnerbratzlershearforceandtextureprofileanalysismeasurements