Cargando…
Estimation of Sensory Pork Loin Tenderness Using Warner-Bratzler Shear Force and Texture Profile Analysis Measurements
This study investigated the degree to which instrumental measurements explain the variation in pork loin tenderness as assessed by the sensory evaluation of trained panelists. Warner-Bratzler shear force (WBS) had a significant relationship with the sensory tenderness variables, such as softness, in...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Asian-Australasian Association of Animal Production Societies (AAAP) and Korean Society of Animal Science and Technology (KSAST)
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4932580/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26954174 http://dx.doi.org/10.5713/ajas.15.0482 |
_version_ | 1782441084607004672 |
---|---|
author | Choe, Jee-Hwan Choi, Mi-Hee Rhee, Min-Suk Kim, Byoung-Chul |
author_facet | Choe, Jee-Hwan Choi, Mi-Hee Rhee, Min-Suk Kim, Byoung-Chul |
author_sort | Choe, Jee-Hwan |
collection | PubMed |
description | This study investigated the degree to which instrumental measurements explain the variation in pork loin tenderness as assessed by the sensory evaluation of trained panelists. Warner-Bratzler shear force (WBS) had a significant relationship with the sensory tenderness variables, such as softness, initial tenderness, chewiness, and rate of breakdown. In a regression analysis, WBS could account variations in these sensory variables, though only to a limited proportion of variation. On the other hand, three parameters from texture profile analysis (TPA)—hardness, gumminess, and chewiness—were significantly correlated with all sensory evaluation variables. In particular, from the result of stepwise regression analysis, TPA hardness alone explained over 15% of variation in all sensory evaluation variables, with the exception of perceptible residue. Based on these results, TPA analysis was found to be better than WBS measurement, with the TPA parameter hardness likely to prove particularly useful, in terms of predicting pork loin tenderness as rated by trained panelists. However, sensory evaluation should be conducted to investigate practical pork tenderness perceived by consumer, because both instrumental measurements could explain only a small portion (less than 20%) of the variability in sensory evaluation. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4932580 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Asian-Australasian Association of Animal Production Societies (AAAP) and Korean Society of Animal Science and Technology (KSAST) |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-49325802016-07-07 Estimation of Sensory Pork Loin Tenderness Using Warner-Bratzler Shear Force and Texture Profile Analysis Measurements Choe, Jee-Hwan Choi, Mi-Hee Rhee, Min-Suk Kim, Byoung-Chul Asian-Australas J Anim Sci Article This study investigated the degree to which instrumental measurements explain the variation in pork loin tenderness as assessed by the sensory evaluation of trained panelists. Warner-Bratzler shear force (WBS) had a significant relationship with the sensory tenderness variables, such as softness, initial tenderness, chewiness, and rate of breakdown. In a regression analysis, WBS could account variations in these sensory variables, though only to a limited proportion of variation. On the other hand, three parameters from texture profile analysis (TPA)—hardness, gumminess, and chewiness—were significantly correlated with all sensory evaluation variables. In particular, from the result of stepwise regression analysis, TPA hardness alone explained over 15% of variation in all sensory evaluation variables, with the exception of perceptible residue. Based on these results, TPA analysis was found to be better than WBS measurement, with the TPA parameter hardness likely to prove particularly useful, in terms of predicting pork loin tenderness as rated by trained panelists. However, sensory evaluation should be conducted to investigate practical pork tenderness perceived by consumer, because both instrumental measurements could explain only a small portion (less than 20%) of the variability in sensory evaluation. Asian-Australasian Association of Animal Production Societies (AAAP) and Korean Society of Animal Science and Technology (KSAST) 2016-07 2015-09-10 /pmc/articles/PMC4932580/ /pubmed/26954174 http://dx.doi.org/10.5713/ajas.15.0482 Text en Copyright © 2016 by Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/), which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Article Choe, Jee-Hwan Choi, Mi-Hee Rhee, Min-Suk Kim, Byoung-Chul Estimation of Sensory Pork Loin Tenderness Using Warner-Bratzler Shear Force and Texture Profile Analysis Measurements |
title | Estimation of Sensory Pork Loin Tenderness Using Warner-Bratzler Shear Force and Texture Profile Analysis Measurements |
title_full | Estimation of Sensory Pork Loin Tenderness Using Warner-Bratzler Shear Force and Texture Profile Analysis Measurements |
title_fullStr | Estimation of Sensory Pork Loin Tenderness Using Warner-Bratzler Shear Force and Texture Profile Analysis Measurements |
title_full_unstemmed | Estimation of Sensory Pork Loin Tenderness Using Warner-Bratzler Shear Force and Texture Profile Analysis Measurements |
title_short | Estimation of Sensory Pork Loin Tenderness Using Warner-Bratzler Shear Force and Texture Profile Analysis Measurements |
title_sort | estimation of sensory pork loin tenderness using warner-bratzler shear force and texture profile analysis measurements |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4932580/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26954174 http://dx.doi.org/10.5713/ajas.15.0482 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT choejeehwan estimationofsensoryporklointendernessusingwarnerbratzlershearforceandtextureprofileanalysismeasurements AT choimihee estimationofsensoryporklointendernessusingwarnerbratzlershearforceandtextureprofileanalysismeasurements AT rheeminsuk estimationofsensoryporklointendernessusingwarnerbratzlershearforceandtextureprofileanalysismeasurements AT kimbyoungchul estimationofsensoryporklointendernessusingwarnerbratzlershearforceandtextureprofileanalysismeasurements |