Cargando…

Adolescents’ ratings of features of parks that encourage park visitation and physical activity

BACKGROUND: The neighbourhood environment such as the availability of parks are a key, but under-researched, influence on adolescents’ physical activity. In addition to overall physical activity levels, park-based physical activity and park visitation is low in this age group. Thus, it is critical t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Veitch, Jenny, Salmon, Jo, Parker, Kate, Bangay, Shaun, Deforche, Benedicte, Timperio, Anna
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4932738/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27378077
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12966-016-0391-9
_version_ 1782441119421825024
author Veitch, Jenny
Salmon, Jo
Parker, Kate
Bangay, Shaun
Deforche, Benedicte
Timperio, Anna
author_facet Veitch, Jenny
Salmon, Jo
Parker, Kate
Bangay, Shaun
Deforche, Benedicte
Timperio, Anna
author_sort Veitch, Jenny
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The neighbourhood environment such as the availability of parks are a key, but under-researched, influence on adolescents’ physical activity. In addition to overall physical activity levels, park-based physical activity and park visitation is low in this age group. Thus, it is critical to identify park features that may encourage or discourage adolescents from visiting parks. This study used a novel methodology to identify key physical characteristics of parks that are perceived to be important for park visitation and park-based physical activity among adolescents. METHODS: Four secondary schools located in low, mid and high socio-economic status areas of Victoria, Australia were recruited. Using a purpose-built computer application, students in years 8–10 were presented with 44 original photographic images of park features. Participants rated each image (range 1–10) on how likely the feature would be to encourage them to visit a park and to engage in park-based physical activity, and placed symbols (‘thumbs up’/‘thumbs down’) on aspects of the image that had a positive or negative influence on their ratings. RESULTS: Participants (n = 99) had a mean age of 13.3 years (SD = 0.87) and 53 % were female. Overall, the top three rated images prompting park visitation by adolescents were: a long steep slide, a flying fox and a table tennis table. These first two features were also reported as being likely to promote physical activity in the park. Differences in ratings were observed for boys and girls. The images that received the greatest number of “thumbs-up” symbols included large swings and slides, table tennis tables, no-smoking signs, flying foxes and BMX tracks. The images that received the greatest number of “thumbs-down” symbols included signage about rules, graffiti, toilets, concrete steps, and skate bowls. CONCLUSION: Physically challenging play equipment is likely to encourage adolescents to visit and be active in parks. Rules, graffiti, toilets and skate bowls may discourage visitation. It is important for park designers, planners and policy makers to consider adolescents’ views of what park design features are important so that parks are created that support and encourage visitation and optimise levels of physical activity when in the park. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12966-016-0391-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4932738
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-49327382016-07-06 Adolescents’ ratings of features of parks that encourage park visitation and physical activity Veitch, Jenny Salmon, Jo Parker, Kate Bangay, Shaun Deforche, Benedicte Timperio, Anna Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act Research BACKGROUND: The neighbourhood environment such as the availability of parks are a key, but under-researched, influence on adolescents’ physical activity. In addition to overall physical activity levels, park-based physical activity and park visitation is low in this age group. Thus, it is critical to identify park features that may encourage or discourage adolescents from visiting parks. This study used a novel methodology to identify key physical characteristics of parks that are perceived to be important for park visitation and park-based physical activity among adolescents. METHODS: Four secondary schools located in low, mid and high socio-economic status areas of Victoria, Australia were recruited. Using a purpose-built computer application, students in years 8–10 were presented with 44 original photographic images of park features. Participants rated each image (range 1–10) on how likely the feature would be to encourage them to visit a park and to engage in park-based physical activity, and placed symbols (‘thumbs up’/‘thumbs down’) on aspects of the image that had a positive or negative influence on their ratings. RESULTS: Participants (n = 99) had a mean age of 13.3 years (SD = 0.87) and 53 % were female. Overall, the top three rated images prompting park visitation by adolescents were: a long steep slide, a flying fox and a table tennis table. These first two features were also reported as being likely to promote physical activity in the park. Differences in ratings were observed for boys and girls. The images that received the greatest number of “thumbs-up” symbols included large swings and slides, table tennis tables, no-smoking signs, flying foxes and BMX tracks. The images that received the greatest number of “thumbs-down” symbols included signage about rules, graffiti, toilets, concrete steps, and skate bowls. CONCLUSION: Physically challenging play equipment is likely to encourage adolescents to visit and be active in parks. Rules, graffiti, toilets and skate bowls may discourage visitation. It is important for park designers, planners and policy makers to consider adolescents’ views of what park design features are important so that parks are created that support and encourage visitation and optimise levels of physical activity when in the park. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12966-016-0391-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2016-07-04 /pmc/articles/PMC4932738/ /pubmed/27378077 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12966-016-0391-9 Text en © The Author(s). 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Veitch, Jenny
Salmon, Jo
Parker, Kate
Bangay, Shaun
Deforche, Benedicte
Timperio, Anna
Adolescents’ ratings of features of parks that encourage park visitation and physical activity
title Adolescents’ ratings of features of parks that encourage park visitation and physical activity
title_full Adolescents’ ratings of features of parks that encourage park visitation and physical activity
title_fullStr Adolescents’ ratings of features of parks that encourage park visitation and physical activity
title_full_unstemmed Adolescents’ ratings of features of parks that encourage park visitation and physical activity
title_short Adolescents’ ratings of features of parks that encourage park visitation and physical activity
title_sort adolescents’ ratings of features of parks that encourage park visitation and physical activity
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4932738/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27378077
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12966-016-0391-9
work_keys_str_mv AT veitchjenny adolescentsratingsoffeaturesofparksthatencourageparkvisitationandphysicalactivity
AT salmonjo adolescentsratingsoffeaturesofparksthatencourageparkvisitationandphysicalactivity
AT parkerkate adolescentsratingsoffeaturesofparksthatencourageparkvisitationandphysicalactivity
AT bangayshaun adolescentsratingsoffeaturesofparksthatencourageparkvisitationandphysicalactivity
AT deforchebenedicte adolescentsratingsoffeaturesofparksthatencourageparkvisitationandphysicalactivity
AT timperioanna adolescentsratingsoffeaturesofparksthatencourageparkvisitationandphysicalactivity