Cargando…
Adolescents’ ratings of features of parks that encourage park visitation and physical activity
BACKGROUND: The neighbourhood environment such as the availability of parks are a key, but under-researched, influence on adolescents’ physical activity. In addition to overall physical activity levels, park-based physical activity and park visitation is low in this age group. Thus, it is critical t...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4932738/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27378077 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12966-016-0391-9 |
_version_ | 1782441119421825024 |
---|---|
author | Veitch, Jenny Salmon, Jo Parker, Kate Bangay, Shaun Deforche, Benedicte Timperio, Anna |
author_facet | Veitch, Jenny Salmon, Jo Parker, Kate Bangay, Shaun Deforche, Benedicte Timperio, Anna |
author_sort | Veitch, Jenny |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The neighbourhood environment such as the availability of parks are a key, but under-researched, influence on adolescents’ physical activity. In addition to overall physical activity levels, park-based physical activity and park visitation is low in this age group. Thus, it is critical to identify park features that may encourage or discourage adolescents from visiting parks. This study used a novel methodology to identify key physical characteristics of parks that are perceived to be important for park visitation and park-based physical activity among adolescents. METHODS: Four secondary schools located in low, mid and high socio-economic status areas of Victoria, Australia were recruited. Using a purpose-built computer application, students in years 8–10 were presented with 44 original photographic images of park features. Participants rated each image (range 1–10) on how likely the feature would be to encourage them to visit a park and to engage in park-based physical activity, and placed symbols (‘thumbs up’/‘thumbs down’) on aspects of the image that had a positive or negative influence on their ratings. RESULTS: Participants (n = 99) had a mean age of 13.3 years (SD = 0.87) and 53 % were female. Overall, the top three rated images prompting park visitation by adolescents were: a long steep slide, a flying fox and a table tennis table. These first two features were also reported as being likely to promote physical activity in the park. Differences in ratings were observed for boys and girls. The images that received the greatest number of “thumbs-up” symbols included large swings and slides, table tennis tables, no-smoking signs, flying foxes and BMX tracks. The images that received the greatest number of “thumbs-down” symbols included signage about rules, graffiti, toilets, concrete steps, and skate bowls. CONCLUSION: Physically challenging play equipment is likely to encourage adolescents to visit and be active in parks. Rules, graffiti, toilets and skate bowls may discourage visitation. It is important for park designers, planners and policy makers to consider adolescents’ views of what park design features are important so that parks are created that support and encourage visitation and optimise levels of physical activity when in the park. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12966-016-0391-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4932738 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-49327382016-07-06 Adolescents’ ratings of features of parks that encourage park visitation and physical activity Veitch, Jenny Salmon, Jo Parker, Kate Bangay, Shaun Deforche, Benedicte Timperio, Anna Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act Research BACKGROUND: The neighbourhood environment such as the availability of parks are a key, but under-researched, influence on adolescents’ physical activity. In addition to overall physical activity levels, park-based physical activity and park visitation is low in this age group. Thus, it is critical to identify park features that may encourage or discourage adolescents from visiting parks. This study used a novel methodology to identify key physical characteristics of parks that are perceived to be important for park visitation and park-based physical activity among adolescents. METHODS: Four secondary schools located in low, mid and high socio-economic status areas of Victoria, Australia were recruited. Using a purpose-built computer application, students in years 8–10 were presented with 44 original photographic images of park features. Participants rated each image (range 1–10) on how likely the feature would be to encourage them to visit a park and to engage in park-based physical activity, and placed symbols (‘thumbs up’/‘thumbs down’) on aspects of the image that had a positive or negative influence on their ratings. RESULTS: Participants (n = 99) had a mean age of 13.3 years (SD = 0.87) and 53 % were female. Overall, the top three rated images prompting park visitation by adolescents were: a long steep slide, a flying fox and a table tennis table. These first two features were also reported as being likely to promote physical activity in the park. Differences in ratings were observed for boys and girls. The images that received the greatest number of “thumbs-up” symbols included large swings and slides, table tennis tables, no-smoking signs, flying foxes and BMX tracks. The images that received the greatest number of “thumbs-down” symbols included signage about rules, graffiti, toilets, concrete steps, and skate bowls. CONCLUSION: Physically challenging play equipment is likely to encourage adolescents to visit and be active in parks. Rules, graffiti, toilets and skate bowls may discourage visitation. It is important for park designers, planners and policy makers to consider adolescents’ views of what park design features are important so that parks are created that support and encourage visitation and optimise levels of physical activity when in the park. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12966-016-0391-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2016-07-04 /pmc/articles/PMC4932738/ /pubmed/27378077 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12966-016-0391-9 Text en © The Author(s). 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Veitch, Jenny Salmon, Jo Parker, Kate Bangay, Shaun Deforche, Benedicte Timperio, Anna Adolescents’ ratings of features of parks that encourage park visitation and physical activity |
title | Adolescents’ ratings of features of parks that encourage park visitation and physical activity |
title_full | Adolescents’ ratings of features of parks that encourage park visitation and physical activity |
title_fullStr | Adolescents’ ratings of features of parks that encourage park visitation and physical activity |
title_full_unstemmed | Adolescents’ ratings of features of parks that encourage park visitation and physical activity |
title_short | Adolescents’ ratings of features of parks that encourage park visitation and physical activity |
title_sort | adolescents’ ratings of features of parks that encourage park visitation and physical activity |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4932738/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27378077 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12966-016-0391-9 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT veitchjenny adolescentsratingsoffeaturesofparksthatencourageparkvisitationandphysicalactivity AT salmonjo adolescentsratingsoffeaturesofparksthatencourageparkvisitationandphysicalactivity AT parkerkate adolescentsratingsoffeaturesofparksthatencourageparkvisitationandphysicalactivity AT bangayshaun adolescentsratingsoffeaturesofparksthatencourageparkvisitationandphysicalactivity AT deforchebenedicte adolescentsratingsoffeaturesofparksthatencourageparkvisitationandphysicalactivity AT timperioanna adolescentsratingsoffeaturesofparksthatencourageparkvisitationandphysicalactivity |