Cargando…
Comparison of AIMS65 Score and Other Scoring Systems for Predicting Clinical Outcomes in Koreans with Nonvariceal Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding
BACKGROUND/AIMS: The AIMS65 score has not been sufficiently validated in Korea. The objective of this study was to compare the AIMS65 and other scoring systems for the prediction of various clinical outcomes in Korean patients with acute nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding (NVUGIB). METHODS:...
Autores principales: | Park, Sung Min, Yeum, Seok Cheon, Kim, Byung-Wook, Kim, Joon Sung, Kim, Ji Hee, Sim, Eun Hui, Ji, Jeong-Seon, Choi, Hwang |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Editorial Office of Gut and Liver
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4933411/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27377742 http://dx.doi.org/10.5009/gnl15153 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Is the AIMS 65 Score Useful in Prepdicting Clinical Outcomes in Korean Patients with Variceal and Nonvariceal Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding?
por: Choe, Jung Wan, et al.
Publicado: (2017) -
The AIMS65 Score Is a Useful Predictor of Mortality in Patients with Nonvariceal Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding: Urgent Endoscopy in Patients with High AIMS65 Scores
por: Park, Sun Wook, et al.
Publicado: (2015) -
Comparison of the AIMS65 Score with Other Risk Stratification Scores in Upper Variceal and Nonvariceal Gastrointestinal Bleeding
por: Alexandrino, Gonçalo, et al.
Publicado: (2018) -
Blatchford Score Is Superior to AIMS65 Score in Predicting the Need for Clinical Interventions in Elderly Patients with Nonvariceal Upper Gastrointestinal Bleed
por: Abusaada, Khalid, et al.
Publicado: (2016) -
Guidelines for Nonvariceal Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding
por: Kim, Joon Sung, et al.
Publicado: (2020)