Cargando…

The use of EMDR in positive verbal material: results from a patient study

BACKGROUND: According to the working memory (WM) theory of eye movement desensitisation and reprocessing (EMDR), dual tasks that tax WM during memory recall reduce image vividness and emotionality of memory during future recalls when no dual task is carried out. There is some evidence that WM taxing...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Matthijssen, Suzy Johanna Martina Adriana, van den Hout, Marcel
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Co-Action Publishing 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4933784/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27387844
http://dx.doi.org/10.3402/ejpt.v7.30119
_version_ 1782441222459097088
author Matthijssen, Suzy Johanna Martina Adriana
van den Hout, Marcel
author_facet Matthijssen, Suzy Johanna Martina Adriana
van den Hout, Marcel
author_sort Matthijssen, Suzy Johanna Martina Adriana
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: According to the working memory (WM) theory of eye movement desensitisation and reprocessing (EMDR), dual tasks that tax WM during memory recall reduce image vividness and emotionality of memory during future recalls when no dual task is carried out. There is some evidence that WM taxing also reduces vividness and emotionality of auditory or verbal imagery. OBJECTIVE: The present study tests the effect of eye movements (EM) on positive verbal material (verbal imagery), which is used in different parts of the EMDR protocol. In the Dutch version of the standard EMDR protocol, a procedure “Positive Closure” (PC) is performed, which uses verbal imagery under dual task condition (EM). The value of EM in this procedure has not been established and according to the WM account would be counterproductive. Two earlier studies with undergraduates, with a set-up comparable to the present one, showed no additive value of the EM in the procedure, but no counterproductive effect either. METHOD: Thirty-six patients rated the belief in possessing two positive personality traits and emotionality of the traits. They then had an EMDR session targeting a negative memory and recalled and re-rated the belief and emotionality of the traits afterward. Subsequently, they recalled one trait while dual tasking (EM) and the other trait without dual tasking. Afterward, they re-rated the belief and emotionality. RESULTS: EM did not affect the belief in possessing the trait or the emotionality. Secondary analysis shows an effective EMDR session itself enhances the belief in the traits, compared to a less or non-effective EMDR session. CONCLUSIONS: EM are not effective in enhancing the belief in possessing a personality trait or the emotionality. If replicated by other patient studies, this suggests elimination of the PC procedure. HIGHLIGHTS OF THE ARTICLE: In this study the additive value of EM on verbal material (in the procedure Positive Closure) is not found. No effect of the procedure Positive Closure on the Belief in a personality trait nor the emotional intensity of the trait was found. An effective EMDR session (large reduction of the SUD during the session) was effective in changing the Belief in personality traits.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4933784
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Co-Action Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-49337842016-07-27 The use of EMDR in positive verbal material: results from a patient study Matthijssen, Suzy Johanna Martina Adriana van den Hout, Marcel Eur J Psychotraumatol Clinical Research Article BACKGROUND: According to the working memory (WM) theory of eye movement desensitisation and reprocessing (EMDR), dual tasks that tax WM during memory recall reduce image vividness and emotionality of memory during future recalls when no dual task is carried out. There is some evidence that WM taxing also reduces vividness and emotionality of auditory or verbal imagery. OBJECTIVE: The present study tests the effect of eye movements (EM) on positive verbal material (verbal imagery), which is used in different parts of the EMDR protocol. In the Dutch version of the standard EMDR protocol, a procedure “Positive Closure” (PC) is performed, which uses verbal imagery under dual task condition (EM). The value of EM in this procedure has not been established and according to the WM account would be counterproductive. Two earlier studies with undergraduates, with a set-up comparable to the present one, showed no additive value of the EM in the procedure, but no counterproductive effect either. METHOD: Thirty-six patients rated the belief in possessing two positive personality traits and emotionality of the traits. They then had an EMDR session targeting a negative memory and recalled and re-rated the belief and emotionality of the traits afterward. Subsequently, they recalled one trait while dual tasking (EM) and the other trait without dual tasking. Afterward, they re-rated the belief and emotionality. RESULTS: EM did not affect the belief in possessing the trait or the emotionality. Secondary analysis shows an effective EMDR session itself enhances the belief in the traits, compared to a less or non-effective EMDR session. CONCLUSIONS: EM are not effective in enhancing the belief in possessing a personality trait or the emotionality. If replicated by other patient studies, this suggests elimination of the PC procedure. HIGHLIGHTS OF THE ARTICLE: In this study the additive value of EM on verbal material (in the procedure Positive Closure) is not found. No effect of the procedure Positive Closure on the Belief in a personality trait nor the emotional intensity of the trait was found. An effective EMDR session (large reduction of the SUD during the session) was effective in changing the Belief in personality traits. Co-Action Publishing 2016-07-04 /pmc/articles/PMC4933784/ /pubmed/27387844 http://dx.doi.org/10.3402/ejpt.v7.30119 Text en © 2016 Suzy Johanna Martina Adriana Matthijssen and Marcel van den Hout http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, allowing third parties to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format, and to remix, transform, and build upon the material, for any purpose, even commercially, under the condition that appropriate credit is given, that a link to the license is provided, and that you indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
spellingShingle Clinical Research Article
Matthijssen, Suzy Johanna Martina Adriana
van den Hout, Marcel
The use of EMDR in positive verbal material: results from a patient study
title The use of EMDR in positive verbal material: results from a patient study
title_full The use of EMDR in positive verbal material: results from a patient study
title_fullStr The use of EMDR in positive verbal material: results from a patient study
title_full_unstemmed The use of EMDR in positive verbal material: results from a patient study
title_short The use of EMDR in positive verbal material: results from a patient study
title_sort use of emdr in positive verbal material: results from a patient study
topic Clinical Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4933784/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27387844
http://dx.doi.org/10.3402/ejpt.v7.30119
work_keys_str_mv AT matthijssensuzyjohannamartinaadriana theuseofemdrinpositiveverbalmaterialresultsfromapatientstudy
AT vandenhoutmarcel theuseofemdrinpositiveverbalmaterialresultsfromapatientstudy
AT matthijssensuzyjohannamartinaadriana useofemdrinpositiveverbalmaterialresultsfromapatientstudy
AT vandenhoutmarcel useofemdrinpositiveverbalmaterialresultsfromapatientstudy