Cargando…

How vision and self-motion combine or compete during path reproduction changes with age

Human adults can optimally integrate visual and non-visual self-motion cues when navigating, while children up to 8 years old cannot. Whether older children can is unknown, limiting our understanding of how our internal multisensory representation of space develops. Eighteen adults and fifteen 10- t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Petrini, Karin, Caradonna, Andrea, Foster, Celia, Burgess, Neil, Nardini, Marko
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4933893/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27381183
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep29163
_version_ 1782441243184201728
author Petrini, Karin
Caradonna, Andrea
Foster, Celia
Burgess, Neil
Nardini, Marko
author_facet Petrini, Karin
Caradonna, Andrea
Foster, Celia
Burgess, Neil
Nardini, Marko
author_sort Petrini, Karin
collection PubMed
description Human adults can optimally integrate visual and non-visual self-motion cues when navigating, while children up to 8 years old cannot. Whether older children can is unknown, limiting our understanding of how our internal multisensory representation of space develops. Eighteen adults and fifteen 10- to 11-year-old children were guided along a two-legged path in darkness (self-motion only), in a virtual room (visual + self-motion), or were shown a pre-recorded walk in the virtual room while standing still (visual only). Participants then reproduced the path in darkness. We obtained a measure of the dispersion of the end-points (variable error) and of their distances from the correct end point (constant error). Only children reduced their variable error when recalling the path in the visual + self-motion condition, indicating combination of these cues. Adults showed a constant error for the combined condition intermediate to those for single cues, indicative of cue competition, which may explain the lack of near-optimal integration in this group. This suggests that later in childhood humans can gain from optimally integrating spatial cues even when in the same situation these are kept separate in adulthood.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4933893
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Nature Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-49338932016-07-08 How vision and self-motion combine or compete during path reproduction changes with age Petrini, Karin Caradonna, Andrea Foster, Celia Burgess, Neil Nardini, Marko Sci Rep Article Human adults can optimally integrate visual and non-visual self-motion cues when navigating, while children up to 8 years old cannot. Whether older children can is unknown, limiting our understanding of how our internal multisensory representation of space develops. Eighteen adults and fifteen 10- to 11-year-old children were guided along a two-legged path in darkness (self-motion only), in a virtual room (visual + self-motion), or were shown a pre-recorded walk in the virtual room while standing still (visual only). Participants then reproduced the path in darkness. We obtained a measure of the dispersion of the end-points (variable error) and of their distances from the correct end point (constant error). Only children reduced their variable error when recalling the path in the visual + self-motion condition, indicating combination of these cues. Adults showed a constant error for the combined condition intermediate to those for single cues, indicative of cue competition, which may explain the lack of near-optimal integration in this group. This suggests that later in childhood humans can gain from optimally integrating spatial cues even when in the same situation these are kept separate in adulthood. Nature Publishing Group 2016-07-06 /pmc/articles/PMC4933893/ /pubmed/27381183 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep29163 Text en Copyright © 2016, Macmillan Publishers Limited http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
spellingShingle Article
Petrini, Karin
Caradonna, Andrea
Foster, Celia
Burgess, Neil
Nardini, Marko
How vision and self-motion combine or compete during path reproduction changes with age
title How vision and self-motion combine or compete during path reproduction changes with age
title_full How vision and self-motion combine or compete during path reproduction changes with age
title_fullStr How vision and self-motion combine or compete during path reproduction changes with age
title_full_unstemmed How vision and self-motion combine or compete during path reproduction changes with age
title_short How vision and self-motion combine or compete during path reproduction changes with age
title_sort how vision and self-motion combine or compete during path reproduction changes with age
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4933893/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27381183
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep29163
work_keys_str_mv AT petrinikarin howvisionandselfmotioncombineorcompeteduringpathreproductionchangeswithage
AT caradonnaandrea howvisionandselfmotioncombineorcompeteduringpathreproductionchangeswithage
AT fostercelia howvisionandselfmotioncombineorcompeteduringpathreproductionchangeswithage
AT burgessneil howvisionandselfmotioncombineorcompeteduringpathreproductionchangeswithage
AT nardinimarko howvisionandselfmotioncombineorcompeteduringpathreproductionchangeswithage