Cargando…

Comparative analyses across cattle genders and breeds reveal the pitfalls caused by false positive and lineage-differential copy number variations

We compared CNV region (CNVR) results derived from 1,682 Nellore cattle with equivalent results derived from our previous analysis of Bovine HapMap samples. By comparing CNV segment frequencies between different genders and groups, we identified 9 frequent, false positive CNVRs with a total length o...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhou, Yang, Utsunomiya, Yuri T., Xu, Lingyang, Hay, El Hamidi abdel, Bickhart, Derek M., Sonstegard, Tad S., Van Tassell, Curtis P., Garcia, Jose Fernando, Liu, George E.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4933914/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27381368
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep29219
_version_ 1782441247985631232
author Zhou, Yang
Utsunomiya, Yuri T.
Xu, Lingyang
Hay, El Hamidi abdel
Bickhart, Derek M.
Sonstegard, Tad S.
Van Tassell, Curtis P.
Garcia, Jose Fernando
Liu, George E.
author_facet Zhou, Yang
Utsunomiya, Yuri T.
Xu, Lingyang
Hay, El Hamidi abdel
Bickhart, Derek M.
Sonstegard, Tad S.
Van Tassell, Curtis P.
Garcia, Jose Fernando
Liu, George E.
author_sort Zhou, Yang
collection PubMed
description We compared CNV region (CNVR) results derived from 1,682 Nellore cattle with equivalent results derived from our previous analysis of Bovine HapMap samples. By comparing CNV segment frequencies between different genders and groups, we identified 9 frequent, false positive CNVRs with a total length of 0.8 Mbp that were likely caused by assembly errors. Although there was a paucity of lineage specific events, we did find one 54 kb deletion on chr5 significantly enriched in Nellore cattle. A few highly frequent CNVRs present in both datasets were detected within genomic regions containing olfactory receptor, ATP-binding cassette, and major histocompatibility complex genes. We further evaluated their impacts on downstream bioinformatics and CNV association analyses. Our results revealed pitfalls caused by false positive and lineage-differential copy number variations and will increase the accuracy of future CNV studies in both taurine and indicine cattle.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4933914
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Nature Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-49339142016-07-08 Comparative analyses across cattle genders and breeds reveal the pitfalls caused by false positive and lineage-differential copy number variations Zhou, Yang Utsunomiya, Yuri T. Xu, Lingyang Hay, El Hamidi abdel Bickhart, Derek M. Sonstegard, Tad S. Van Tassell, Curtis P. Garcia, Jose Fernando Liu, George E. Sci Rep Article We compared CNV region (CNVR) results derived from 1,682 Nellore cattle with equivalent results derived from our previous analysis of Bovine HapMap samples. By comparing CNV segment frequencies between different genders and groups, we identified 9 frequent, false positive CNVRs with a total length of 0.8 Mbp that were likely caused by assembly errors. Although there was a paucity of lineage specific events, we did find one 54 kb deletion on chr5 significantly enriched in Nellore cattle. A few highly frequent CNVRs present in both datasets were detected within genomic regions containing olfactory receptor, ATP-binding cassette, and major histocompatibility complex genes. We further evaluated their impacts on downstream bioinformatics and CNV association analyses. Our results revealed pitfalls caused by false positive and lineage-differential copy number variations and will increase the accuracy of future CNV studies in both taurine and indicine cattle. Nature Publishing Group 2016-07-06 /pmc/articles/PMC4933914/ /pubmed/27381368 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep29219 Text en Copyright © 2016, Macmillan Publishers Limited http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
spellingShingle Article
Zhou, Yang
Utsunomiya, Yuri T.
Xu, Lingyang
Hay, El Hamidi abdel
Bickhart, Derek M.
Sonstegard, Tad S.
Van Tassell, Curtis P.
Garcia, Jose Fernando
Liu, George E.
Comparative analyses across cattle genders and breeds reveal the pitfalls caused by false positive and lineage-differential copy number variations
title Comparative analyses across cattle genders and breeds reveal the pitfalls caused by false positive and lineage-differential copy number variations
title_full Comparative analyses across cattle genders and breeds reveal the pitfalls caused by false positive and lineage-differential copy number variations
title_fullStr Comparative analyses across cattle genders and breeds reveal the pitfalls caused by false positive and lineage-differential copy number variations
title_full_unstemmed Comparative analyses across cattle genders and breeds reveal the pitfalls caused by false positive and lineage-differential copy number variations
title_short Comparative analyses across cattle genders and breeds reveal the pitfalls caused by false positive and lineage-differential copy number variations
title_sort comparative analyses across cattle genders and breeds reveal the pitfalls caused by false positive and lineage-differential copy number variations
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4933914/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27381368
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep29219
work_keys_str_mv AT zhouyang comparativeanalysesacrosscattlegendersandbreedsrevealthepitfallscausedbyfalsepositiveandlineagedifferentialcopynumbervariations
AT utsunomiyayurit comparativeanalysesacrosscattlegendersandbreedsrevealthepitfallscausedbyfalsepositiveandlineagedifferentialcopynumbervariations
AT xulingyang comparativeanalysesacrosscattlegendersandbreedsrevealthepitfallscausedbyfalsepositiveandlineagedifferentialcopynumbervariations
AT hayelhamidiabdel comparativeanalysesacrosscattlegendersandbreedsrevealthepitfallscausedbyfalsepositiveandlineagedifferentialcopynumbervariations
AT bickhartderekm comparativeanalysesacrosscattlegendersandbreedsrevealthepitfallscausedbyfalsepositiveandlineagedifferentialcopynumbervariations
AT sonstegardtads comparativeanalysesacrosscattlegendersandbreedsrevealthepitfallscausedbyfalsepositiveandlineagedifferentialcopynumbervariations
AT vantassellcurtisp comparativeanalysesacrosscattlegendersandbreedsrevealthepitfallscausedbyfalsepositiveandlineagedifferentialcopynumbervariations
AT garciajosefernando comparativeanalysesacrosscattlegendersandbreedsrevealthepitfallscausedbyfalsepositiveandlineagedifferentialcopynumbervariations
AT liugeorgee comparativeanalysesacrosscattlegendersandbreedsrevealthepitfallscausedbyfalsepositiveandlineagedifferentialcopynumbervariations