Cargando…

Systematic review of the health and societal effects of medication organisation devices

BACKGROUND: Suboptimal medication adherence is a significant threat to public health and resources. Devices that organise weekly doses by time and day are commonly used to reduce unintentional non-adherence. However, there is limited evidence to support their use. This systematic review was conducte...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Watson, Steven James, Aldus, Clare Frances, Bond, Christine, Bhattacharya, Debi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4933998/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27381448
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-016-1446-y
_version_ 1782441264823664640
author Watson, Steven James
Aldus, Clare Frances
Bond, Christine
Bhattacharya, Debi
author_facet Watson, Steven James
Aldus, Clare Frances
Bond, Christine
Bhattacharya, Debi
author_sort Watson, Steven James
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Suboptimal medication adherence is a significant threat to public health and resources. Devices that organise weekly doses by time and day are commonly used to reduce unintentional non-adherence. However, there is limited evidence to support their use. This systematic review was conducted to evaluate current evidence for their efficacy, safety and costs. METHODS: A pre-defined search of electronic databases from inception to January 2013 augmented with hand-searching was conducted. No limits were placed on publication date. Studies that compared organisation devices used by patients administering their own medication with standard medication packaging regardless of study design were eligible for inclusion. Studies that solely explored dispensing aspects of organisation devices were included whether or not they compared this to standard care. Screening of articles for inclusion and data extraction were completed independently by two reviewers with disagreements resolved by discussion. Outcomes were categorised into impact on health, medication adherence, healthcare utilisation, dispensing errors, supply procedures and costs. Risk of bias was also assessed. RESULTS: Seventeen studies met the inclusion criteria. Health outcomes were investigated in seven studies of which three reported a positive effect associated with organisation devices. Medication adherence was reported in eight studies of which three reported a positive effect. Three studies reported health care utilisation data but overall results are inconclusive. No optimal dispensing or supply procedures were identified. Economic assessment of the impact of organisation devices is lacking. All studies were subject to a high risk of bias. CONCLUSIONS: Evidence regarding the effects of medication organisation devices was limited, and the available evidence was susceptible to a high risk of bias. Organisation devices may help unintentional medication non-adherence and could improve health outcomes. There is a strong need for more studies that explore the impact of such devices on patients, and an equally pressing need for studies that explore the impacts on healthcare services. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This systematic review is registered with PROSPERO (Registration number CRD42011001718).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4933998
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-49339982016-07-07 Systematic review of the health and societal effects of medication organisation devices Watson, Steven James Aldus, Clare Frances Bond, Christine Bhattacharya, Debi BMC Health Serv Res Research Article BACKGROUND: Suboptimal medication adherence is a significant threat to public health and resources. Devices that organise weekly doses by time and day are commonly used to reduce unintentional non-adherence. However, there is limited evidence to support their use. This systematic review was conducted to evaluate current evidence for their efficacy, safety and costs. METHODS: A pre-defined search of electronic databases from inception to January 2013 augmented with hand-searching was conducted. No limits were placed on publication date. Studies that compared organisation devices used by patients administering their own medication with standard medication packaging regardless of study design were eligible for inclusion. Studies that solely explored dispensing aspects of organisation devices were included whether or not they compared this to standard care. Screening of articles for inclusion and data extraction were completed independently by two reviewers with disagreements resolved by discussion. Outcomes were categorised into impact on health, medication adherence, healthcare utilisation, dispensing errors, supply procedures and costs. Risk of bias was also assessed. RESULTS: Seventeen studies met the inclusion criteria. Health outcomes were investigated in seven studies of which three reported a positive effect associated with organisation devices. Medication adherence was reported in eight studies of which three reported a positive effect. Three studies reported health care utilisation data but overall results are inconclusive. No optimal dispensing or supply procedures were identified. Economic assessment of the impact of organisation devices is lacking. All studies were subject to a high risk of bias. CONCLUSIONS: Evidence regarding the effects of medication organisation devices was limited, and the available evidence was susceptible to a high risk of bias. Organisation devices may help unintentional medication non-adherence and could improve health outcomes. There is a strong need for more studies that explore the impact of such devices on patients, and an equally pressing need for studies that explore the impacts on healthcare services. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This systematic review is registered with PROSPERO (Registration number CRD42011001718). BioMed Central 2016-07-06 /pmc/articles/PMC4933998/ /pubmed/27381448 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-016-1446-y Text en © Watson et al. 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Watson, Steven James
Aldus, Clare Frances
Bond, Christine
Bhattacharya, Debi
Systematic review of the health and societal effects of medication organisation devices
title Systematic review of the health and societal effects of medication organisation devices
title_full Systematic review of the health and societal effects of medication organisation devices
title_fullStr Systematic review of the health and societal effects of medication organisation devices
title_full_unstemmed Systematic review of the health and societal effects of medication organisation devices
title_short Systematic review of the health and societal effects of medication organisation devices
title_sort systematic review of the health and societal effects of medication organisation devices
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4933998/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27381448
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-016-1446-y
work_keys_str_mv AT watsonstevenjames systematicreviewofthehealthandsocietaleffectsofmedicationorganisationdevices
AT aldusclarefrances systematicreviewofthehealthandsocietaleffectsofmedicationorganisationdevices
AT bondchristine systematicreviewofthehealthandsocietaleffectsofmedicationorganisationdevices
AT bhattacharyadebi systematicreviewofthehealthandsocietaleffectsofmedicationorganisationdevices