Cargando…

Comparative evaluation of endodontic pressure syringe, insulin syringe, jiffy tube, and local anesthetic syringe in obturation of primary teeth: An in vitro study

PURPOSE: The purpose of this in vitro study was to compare four methods of root canal obturation in primary teeth using conventional radiography. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 96 root canals of primary molars were prepared and obturated with zinc oxide eugenol. Obturation methods compared were e...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hiremath, Mallayya C., Srivastava, Pooja
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4934101/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27433062
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0976-9668.184698
_version_ 1782441278692130816
author Hiremath, Mallayya C.
Srivastava, Pooja
author_facet Hiremath, Mallayya C.
Srivastava, Pooja
author_sort Hiremath, Mallayya C.
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: The purpose of this in vitro study was to compare four methods of root canal obturation in primary teeth using conventional radiography. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 96 root canals of primary molars were prepared and obturated with zinc oxide eugenol. Obturation methods compared were endodontic pressure syringe, insulin syringe, jiffy tube, and local anesthetic syringe. The root canal obturations were evaluated by conventional radiography for the length of obturation and presence of voids. The obtained data were analyzed using Chi-square test. RESULTS: The results showed significant differences between the four groups for the length of obturation (P < 0.05). The endodontic pressure syringe showed the best results (98.5% optimal fillings) and jiffy tube showed the poor results (37.5% optimal fillings) for the length of obturation. The insulin syringe (79.2% optimal fillings) and local anesthetic syringe (66.7% optimal fillings) showed acceptable results for the length of root canal obturation. However, minor voids were present in all the four techniques used. CONCLUSIONS: Endodontic pressure syringe produced the best results in terms of length of obturation and controlling paste extrusion from the apical foramen. However, insulin syringe and local anesthetic syringe can be used as effective alternative methods.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4934101
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-49341012016-07-18 Comparative evaluation of endodontic pressure syringe, insulin syringe, jiffy tube, and local anesthetic syringe in obturation of primary teeth: An in vitro study Hiremath, Mallayya C. Srivastava, Pooja J Nat Sci Biol Med Original Article PURPOSE: The purpose of this in vitro study was to compare four methods of root canal obturation in primary teeth using conventional radiography. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 96 root canals of primary molars were prepared and obturated with zinc oxide eugenol. Obturation methods compared were endodontic pressure syringe, insulin syringe, jiffy tube, and local anesthetic syringe. The root canal obturations were evaluated by conventional radiography for the length of obturation and presence of voids. The obtained data were analyzed using Chi-square test. RESULTS: The results showed significant differences between the four groups for the length of obturation (P < 0.05). The endodontic pressure syringe showed the best results (98.5% optimal fillings) and jiffy tube showed the poor results (37.5% optimal fillings) for the length of obturation. The insulin syringe (79.2% optimal fillings) and local anesthetic syringe (66.7% optimal fillings) showed acceptable results for the length of root canal obturation. However, minor voids were present in all the four techniques used. CONCLUSIONS: Endodontic pressure syringe produced the best results in terms of length of obturation and controlling paste extrusion from the apical foramen. However, insulin syringe and local anesthetic syringe can be used as effective alternative methods. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2016 /pmc/articles/PMC4934101/ /pubmed/27433062 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0976-9668.184698 Text en Copyright: © Journal of Natural Science, Biology and Medicine http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Hiremath, Mallayya C.
Srivastava, Pooja
Comparative evaluation of endodontic pressure syringe, insulin syringe, jiffy tube, and local anesthetic syringe in obturation of primary teeth: An in vitro study
title Comparative evaluation of endodontic pressure syringe, insulin syringe, jiffy tube, and local anesthetic syringe in obturation of primary teeth: An in vitro study
title_full Comparative evaluation of endodontic pressure syringe, insulin syringe, jiffy tube, and local anesthetic syringe in obturation of primary teeth: An in vitro study
title_fullStr Comparative evaluation of endodontic pressure syringe, insulin syringe, jiffy tube, and local anesthetic syringe in obturation of primary teeth: An in vitro study
title_full_unstemmed Comparative evaluation of endodontic pressure syringe, insulin syringe, jiffy tube, and local anesthetic syringe in obturation of primary teeth: An in vitro study
title_short Comparative evaluation of endodontic pressure syringe, insulin syringe, jiffy tube, and local anesthetic syringe in obturation of primary teeth: An in vitro study
title_sort comparative evaluation of endodontic pressure syringe, insulin syringe, jiffy tube, and local anesthetic syringe in obturation of primary teeth: an in vitro study
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4934101/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27433062
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0976-9668.184698
work_keys_str_mv AT hiremathmallayyac comparativeevaluationofendodonticpressuresyringeinsulinsyringejiffytubeandlocalanestheticsyringeinobturationofprimaryteethaninvitrostudy
AT srivastavapooja comparativeevaluationofendodonticpressuresyringeinsulinsyringejiffytubeandlocalanestheticsyringeinobturationofprimaryteethaninvitrostudy