Cargando…

Evaluation of Cueing Innovation for Pressure Ulcer Prevention Using Staff Focus Groups

The purpose of the manuscript is to describe long-term care (LTC) staff perceptions of a music cueing intervention designed to improve staff integration of pressure ulcer (PrU) prevention guidelines regarding consistent and regular movement of LTC residents a minimum of every two hours. The Diffusio...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yap, Tracey L., Kennerly, Susan, Corazzini, Kirsten, Porter, Kristie, Toles, Mark, Anderson, Ruth A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4934592/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27429278
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/healthcare2030299
_version_ 1782441365020344320
author Yap, Tracey L.
Kennerly, Susan
Corazzini, Kirsten
Porter, Kristie
Toles, Mark
Anderson, Ruth A.
author_facet Yap, Tracey L.
Kennerly, Susan
Corazzini, Kirsten
Porter, Kristie
Toles, Mark
Anderson, Ruth A.
author_sort Yap, Tracey L.
collection PubMed
description The purpose of the manuscript is to describe long-term care (LTC) staff perceptions of a music cueing intervention designed to improve staff integration of pressure ulcer (PrU) prevention guidelines regarding consistent and regular movement of LTC residents a minimum of every two hours. The Diffusion of Innovation (DOI) model guided staff interviews about their perceptions of the intervention’s characteristics, outcomes, and sustainability. Methods: This was a qualitative, observational study of staff perceptions of the PrU prevention intervention conducted in Midwestern U.S. LTC facilities (N = 45 staff members). One focus group was held in each of eight intervention facilities using a semi-structured interview protocol. Transcripts were analyzed using thematic content analysis, and summaries for each category were compared across groups. Results: The a priori codes (observability, trialability, compatibility, relative advantage and complexity) described the innovation characteristics, and the sixth code, sustainability, was identified in the data. Within each code, two themes emerged as a positive or negative response regarding characteristics of the innovation. Moreover, within the sustainability code, a third theme emerged that was labeled “brainstormed ideas”, focusing on strategies for improving the innovation. Implications: Cueing LTC staff using music offers a sustainable potential to improve PrU prevention practices, to increase resident movement, which can subsequently lead to a reduction in PrUs.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4934592
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-49345922016-07-12 Evaluation of Cueing Innovation for Pressure Ulcer Prevention Using Staff Focus Groups Yap, Tracey L. Kennerly, Susan Corazzini, Kirsten Porter, Kristie Toles, Mark Anderson, Ruth A. Healthcare (Basel) Review The purpose of the manuscript is to describe long-term care (LTC) staff perceptions of a music cueing intervention designed to improve staff integration of pressure ulcer (PrU) prevention guidelines regarding consistent and regular movement of LTC residents a minimum of every two hours. The Diffusion of Innovation (DOI) model guided staff interviews about their perceptions of the intervention’s characteristics, outcomes, and sustainability. Methods: This was a qualitative, observational study of staff perceptions of the PrU prevention intervention conducted in Midwestern U.S. LTC facilities (N = 45 staff members). One focus group was held in each of eight intervention facilities using a semi-structured interview protocol. Transcripts were analyzed using thematic content analysis, and summaries for each category were compared across groups. Results: The a priori codes (observability, trialability, compatibility, relative advantage and complexity) described the innovation characteristics, and the sixth code, sustainability, was identified in the data. Within each code, two themes emerged as a positive or negative response regarding characteristics of the innovation. Moreover, within the sustainability code, a third theme emerged that was labeled “brainstormed ideas”, focusing on strategies for improving the innovation. Implications: Cueing LTC staff using music offers a sustainable potential to improve PrU prevention practices, to increase resident movement, which can subsequently lead to a reduction in PrUs. MDPI 2014-07-25 /pmc/articles/PMC4934592/ /pubmed/27429278 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/healthcare2030299 Text en © 2014 by the authors; licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/).
spellingShingle Review
Yap, Tracey L.
Kennerly, Susan
Corazzini, Kirsten
Porter, Kristie
Toles, Mark
Anderson, Ruth A.
Evaluation of Cueing Innovation for Pressure Ulcer Prevention Using Staff Focus Groups
title Evaluation of Cueing Innovation for Pressure Ulcer Prevention Using Staff Focus Groups
title_full Evaluation of Cueing Innovation for Pressure Ulcer Prevention Using Staff Focus Groups
title_fullStr Evaluation of Cueing Innovation for Pressure Ulcer Prevention Using Staff Focus Groups
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of Cueing Innovation for Pressure Ulcer Prevention Using Staff Focus Groups
title_short Evaluation of Cueing Innovation for Pressure Ulcer Prevention Using Staff Focus Groups
title_sort evaluation of cueing innovation for pressure ulcer prevention using staff focus groups
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4934592/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27429278
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/healthcare2030299
work_keys_str_mv AT yaptraceyl evaluationofcueinginnovationforpressureulcerpreventionusingstafffocusgroups
AT kennerlysusan evaluationofcueinginnovationforpressureulcerpreventionusingstafffocusgroups
AT corazzinikirsten evaluationofcueinginnovationforpressureulcerpreventionusingstafffocusgroups
AT porterkristie evaluationofcueinginnovationforpressureulcerpreventionusingstafffocusgroups
AT tolesmark evaluationofcueinginnovationforpressureulcerpreventionusingstafffocusgroups
AT andersonrutha evaluationofcueinginnovationforpressureulcerpreventionusingstafffocusgroups