Cargando…
Evaluation of Cueing Innovation for Pressure Ulcer Prevention Using Staff Focus Groups
The purpose of the manuscript is to describe long-term care (LTC) staff perceptions of a music cueing intervention designed to improve staff integration of pressure ulcer (PrU) prevention guidelines regarding consistent and regular movement of LTC residents a minimum of every two hours. The Diffusio...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4934592/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27429278 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/healthcare2030299 |
_version_ | 1782441365020344320 |
---|---|
author | Yap, Tracey L. Kennerly, Susan Corazzini, Kirsten Porter, Kristie Toles, Mark Anderson, Ruth A. |
author_facet | Yap, Tracey L. Kennerly, Susan Corazzini, Kirsten Porter, Kristie Toles, Mark Anderson, Ruth A. |
author_sort | Yap, Tracey L. |
collection | PubMed |
description | The purpose of the manuscript is to describe long-term care (LTC) staff perceptions of a music cueing intervention designed to improve staff integration of pressure ulcer (PrU) prevention guidelines regarding consistent and regular movement of LTC residents a minimum of every two hours. The Diffusion of Innovation (DOI) model guided staff interviews about their perceptions of the intervention’s characteristics, outcomes, and sustainability. Methods: This was a qualitative, observational study of staff perceptions of the PrU prevention intervention conducted in Midwestern U.S. LTC facilities (N = 45 staff members). One focus group was held in each of eight intervention facilities using a semi-structured interview protocol. Transcripts were analyzed using thematic content analysis, and summaries for each category were compared across groups. Results: The a priori codes (observability, trialability, compatibility, relative advantage and complexity) described the innovation characteristics, and the sixth code, sustainability, was identified in the data. Within each code, two themes emerged as a positive or negative response regarding characteristics of the innovation. Moreover, within the sustainability code, a third theme emerged that was labeled “brainstormed ideas”, focusing on strategies for improving the innovation. Implications: Cueing LTC staff using music offers a sustainable potential to improve PrU prevention practices, to increase resident movement, which can subsequently lead to a reduction in PrUs. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4934592 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-49345922016-07-12 Evaluation of Cueing Innovation for Pressure Ulcer Prevention Using Staff Focus Groups Yap, Tracey L. Kennerly, Susan Corazzini, Kirsten Porter, Kristie Toles, Mark Anderson, Ruth A. Healthcare (Basel) Review The purpose of the manuscript is to describe long-term care (LTC) staff perceptions of a music cueing intervention designed to improve staff integration of pressure ulcer (PrU) prevention guidelines regarding consistent and regular movement of LTC residents a minimum of every two hours. The Diffusion of Innovation (DOI) model guided staff interviews about their perceptions of the intervention’s characteristics, outcomes, and sustainability. Methods: This was a qualitative, observational study of staff perceptions of the PrU prevention intervention conducted in Midwestern U.S. LTC facilities (N = 45 staff members). One focus group was held in each of eight intervention facilities using a semi-structured interview protocol. Transcripts were analyzed using thematic content analysis, and summaries for each category were compared across groups. Results: The a priori codes (observability, trialability, compatibility, relative advantage and complexity) described the innovation characteristics, and the sixth code, sustainability, was identified in the data. Within each code, two themes emerged as a positive or negative response regarding characteristics of the innovation. Moreover, within the sustainability code, a third theme emerged that was labeled “brainstormed ideas”, focusing on strategies for improving the innovation. Implications: Cueing LTC staff using music offers a sustainable potential to improve PrU prevention practices, to increase resident movement, which can subsequently lead to a reduction in PrUs. MDPI 2014-07-25 /pmc/articles/PMC4934592/ /pubmed/27429278 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/healthcare2030299 Text en © 2014 by the authors; licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/). |
spellingShingle | Review Yap, Tracey L. Kennerly, Susan Corazzini, Kirsten Porter, Kristie Toles, Mark Anderson, Ruth A. Evaluation of Cueing Innovation for Pressure Ulcer Prevention Using Staff Focus Groups |
title | Evaluation of Cueing Innovation for Pressure Ulcer Prevention Using Staff Focus Groups |
title_full | Evaluation of Cueing Innovation for Pressure Ulcer Prevention Using Staff Focus Groups |
title_fullStr | Evaluation of Cueing Innovation for Pressure Ulcer Prevention Using Staff Focus Groups |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluation of Cueing Innovation for Pressure Ulcer Prevention Using Staff Focus Groups |
title_short | Evaluation of Cueing Innovation for Pressure Ulcer Prevention Using Staff Focus Groups |
title_sort | evaluation of cueing innovation for pressure ulcer prevention using staff focus groups |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4934592/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27429278 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/healthcare2030299 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT yaptraceyl evaluationofcueinginnovationforpressureulcerpreventionusingstafffocusgroups AT kennerlysusan evaluationofcueinginnovationforpressureulcerpreventionusingstafffocusgroups AT corazzinikirsten evaluationofcueinginnovationforpressureulcerpreventionusingstafffocusgroups AT porterkristie evaluationofcueinginnovationforpressureulcerpreventionusingstafffocusgroups AT tolesmark evaluationofcueinginnovationforpressureulcerpreventionusingstafffocusgroups AT andersonrutha evaluationofcueinginnovationforpressureulcerpreventionusingstafffocusgroups |